PDA

View Full Version : EGM October review scores


Scorch
08-27-2007, 03:09 PM
sorry if they're posted. saw these on neogaf



bioshock 10, 10, 10 gotm
heavenly sword 8, 8, 9
warhawk 8.5, 7, 8.5
MySims - 6, 5.5, 6.0
Sonic Rush Adventure - 7.5, 7.0, 7.0
Wild Arms 5 - 8, 6.5, 5
Eternal Sonata - 6, 8, 7
Madden 2008- 9, 9, 8.5
NHL 2008 (EA) - 9.5, 9, 9
Medal of Honor Airborne - 6.5, 8, 5.5

Heavenly Sword is now a must rent, NHL 08 is a must buy for me. I was going to hold off, but.. yeah.

Bummed about the MySims score though. I wonder what their gripes were.

yummytyson
08-27-2007, 03:12 PM
sorry, im a noob but what categories are the 3 numbers in? graphics, gameplay etc;?

Scorch
08-27-2007, 03:15 PM
sorry, im a noob but what categories are the 3 numbers in? graphics, gameplay etc;?

they get three people's opinions on the game and the three scores listed are what the three people gave it as an overall score

InuFaye
08-27-2007, 03:31 PM
Who gave heavenly sword a 9? I bet it was shane. And also any rumors this month?

jaso
08-27-2007, 03:38 PM
Bummer about Eternal Sonata. I played the demo and thought it had loads of potential. MOH seemed alright, but you can get COD 2 and COD 3 for less, and they're better games.

And for what it's worth, Bioshock really is that good.

InuFaye
08-27-2007, 03:50 PM
Bummer about Eternal Sonata. I played the demo and thought it had loads of potential. MOH seemed alright, but you can get COD 2 and COD 3 for less, and they're better games.

And for what it's worth, Bioshock really is that good.

Alot of people at EGM dont like JRPGS. Persona and Jeanne D'arc are the only ones to get good reviews lately. I wouldnt listen to what they have to say to much about eternal sonata.

If you liked the demo just pick up the game it got as high as an 8, and people have to remeber that a 5 in egm is average. Most other sources have 7's been an average. So take that with a grain of salt. I am gonna get the game day 1 since there are like 2 JPGS on the damn system and i am hungering for some more.

jkam
08-27-2007, 03:53 PM
I'm wondering what they scored the first Sonic Rush because that game was great and I am looking forward to Adventure. I thought it would score a little higher.

Vinny
08-27-2007, 03:56 PM
Some disappointing scores but EGM's reviews are hard to trust these days...

PyroGamer
08-27-2007, 04:03 PM
Nothing here suprises me in the slightest.

Can't wait for this to come in the mail so I can read that Warhawk review, see what they took off 3 points for.

Rozz
08-27-2007, 04:06 PM
I never even got my fucking September issue in the mail.

Redeema
08-27-2007, 04:15 PM
It is good to see that finally they're bringing the Madden games scores back down to earth. No Metroid Prime 3 review, though. Nintendo is the hardest nut to crack in the business if even EGM can't snag a copy. Makes me feel better that I don't get Nintendo stuff either.

I'll have to give Heavenly Sword a run through for sure.

Richlough
08-27-2007, 04:16 PM
I never even got my fucking September issue in the mail.
I did it was my last free one . I'm thinking of calling and switching my frree GFW over to EGM . If anyone cares , I'll let them know if they let me .

fyffem
08-27-2007, 04:33 PM
Disappointing numbers for MySims... I'm hoping it's a solid game. I'd hate to see all of EAs attempts at creativity on the Wii fail.

Eternal Sonata's a bummer as well.

Plinko
08-27-2007, 04:36 PM
Yay for NHL 08--I had a feeling that game was going to rock.

SL4IN
08-27-2007, 04:38 PM
I want to know why madden 08 got such high review scores. It's not that great.

JohnStar
08-27-2007, 04:57 PM
Thx for the info, I was looking for that :)

tangytangerine
08-27-2007, 05:05 PM
I never even got my fucking September issue in the mail.

Same goes for me, except it was Game Informer. It's the only fucking magazine I did not receive and wondering if the retard at Gamestop fucked up my address since I signed up at the beginning of June.

Richlough- yes, you can swap the remaining GFW issues to EGM issues. Just say you want to cancel your GFW subscription and move them over to EGM. I did it last year with 2 year's worth of CGW moving to OPM. Then ZD moved over that to EGM for 4 years after OPM was canceled since they doubled the year's worth.

As for the scores, Mysims was one that seemed kinda iffy. Haven't read the review, but I'm guessing it's something like "The Sims Lite".

Figured MOH would get mixed reviews. Ever since absorbing Dreamworks Interactive in their fold, EA really doesn't know what to do right in the franchise and getting their asses handed to them by Call of Duty & Activision.

Maynard
08-27-2007, 05:11 PM
It might be some hand work but can someone post there GOOD BAD and other for the reviews?

That would be awesome :)

shieryda
08-27-2007, 05:16 PM
Sometimes these reviews are pretty amusing. Like when one guys gives the game an 8, and another one gives it a 5.

I, too, was a little surprised by Eternal Sonata's scores, and that Heavenly Sword scored so high.

I didn't want to buy NHL 08 so soon, but those scores are great!

rodeojones903
08-27-2007, 05:21 PM
EGM was going to dock Warhawk a point if it was over $30 correct? So are those scores really a 9.5, 8, 9.5?

King
08-27-2007, 05:31 PM
Who reviewed Eternal Sonata?

P.I.Staker
08-27-2007, 05:36 PM
Bioshock deserves its 10. It is fuck ing awesome.

Kendro
08-27-2007, 05:47 PM
I never even got my fucking September issue in the mail.
Same goes for me, except it was Game Informer.
The fuck? Same goes for me. I have subscriptions to both EGM and Game Informer and got neither this month.

As for Eternal Sonata, I'm kinda bummed. I was looking forward to Blue Dragon and Eternal Sonata but both seemed to get panned. At least I won't have to drop $120 so quickly and can grab them when their prices drop.

rendil
08-27-2007, 06:20 PM
EGM was going to dock Warhawk a point if it was over $30 correct? So are those scores really a 9.5, 8, 9.5?

My understanding was that it went to print before they knew the price. So the scores would be 7.5, 6, 7.5 after the deduction.

fyffem
08-27-2007, 06:57 PM
Wild Arms was all over the place. I'm guessing it's just "if you like the series, you like the game"

SpreadTheWord
08-27-2007, 07:12 PM
Figured MOH would get mixed reviews. Ever since absorbing Dreamworks Interactive in their fold, EA really doesn't know what to do right in the franchise and getting their asses handed to them by Call of Duty & Activision.

It doesn't have anthing to do with Dreamworks. The dev studio that made the first few MOH games (2015 I think) left EA and started a new studio called Infinity Ward and created the Call of Duty games.

jer7583
08-27-2007, 07:41 PM
It was one reviewer who said that, and it was for the online 1up review. EGM as a whole did not take a stance of "if the game is more than $30, subtract a point."

And I think EGM is the best place for reviews. Parish and a few others in particular know what makes an RPG in particular worthwhile and are much more capable of seeing that a good 3/4ths of the RPG/Strategy games released are garbage and not worth your time. Deserving ones like Persona and Jeanne D'arc get good reviews.. because they're actually good. Crap like Luminous Arc and Heroes of Mana get what they deserve.

Rei no Otaku
08-27-2007, 07:51 PM
Luminous Arc is far from crap... When it comes to RPGs reviewers don't know shit. My favorite RPG this year after Persona 3 is Ar Tonelico. I think we all know how well that did with reviewers. Eternal Sonata and Wild Arms 5=Day 1 purchases. And I know I'll enjoy almost every minute of both.

I don't understand this "I really wanted to get this game, and I enjoyed the demo. But some random person I don't know from Adam said he didn't like it. Guess I won't get it!" mentality. If you think a game looks good then give it a try. You'll be surprised how many times you end up loving something the press tries to tell you to hate.

rodeojones903
08-27-2007, 07:56 PM
Luminous Arc is far from crap...


But its no Jeanne D'Arc either. Luminous Arc is not horrible, but it is easy and cookie cutter. Jeanne D'Arc blows it out of the water.

Rei no Otaku
08-27-2007, 08:06 PM
But its no Jeanne D'Arc either. Luminous Arc is not horrible, but it is easy and cookie cutter. Jeanne D'Arc blows it out of the water.
Won't argue that. I'm playing both right now, and Jeanne is definitely getting the majority of my time. It's an excellent game all around.

RAMSTORIA
08-27-2007, 08:33 PM
ill have to wait for the nhl 2k8 scores, but with scores like that i might make the switch to nhl 08

SL4IN
08-27-2007, 09:15 PM
Won't argue that. I'm playing both right now, and Jeanne is definitely getting the majority of my time. It's an excellent game all around.

I wish my store got jeanne d' arc in. I want that game so bad.

RelentlessRolento
08-27-2007, 09:48 PM
I still prefer written overviews of what was good and bad instead of point systems.

jer7583
08-27-2007, 09:49 PM
I think it's pretty fair to be tough on RPGs, for one reason because they are a huge time investment. If you're going to spend 60-80 hours with a game, it better be pretty rock solid with those fundamentals you'll be repeating throughout those hours. Also considering limited time available, who wants to waste their time with second tier RPGs?

Rolento: I can agree with you there, but point systems will never go away simply because the masses demand them. CGW took a ton of flak for removing their scores. It's basically not a factor worth losing readership over.

Rei no Otaku
08-27-2007, 09:51 PM
I still prefer written overviews of what was good and bad instead of point systems.
I agree with this. I said it in the Bioshock thread, but I don't think reviews should have scores.

Flyersfan
08-27-2007, 10:01 PM
Wow at NHL 08.



Day 1 purchase for me.

SpreadTheWord
08-27-2007, 10:46 PM
I don't understand this "I really wanted to get this game, and I enjoyed the demo. But some random person I don't know from Adam said he didn't like it. Guess I won't get it!" mentality. If you think a game looks good then give it a try. You'll be surprised how many times you end up loving something the press tries to tell you to hate.
This game in particular (Eternal Sonata) has been getting some good hype at IGN Xbox.

And while a six may be a low score. there is nothing wrong with a 7 and an 8.

I agree with this. I said it in the Bioshock thread, but I don't think reviews should have scores.

I don't want to turn this into a review score discussion but I think reviews should have many levels of depth. Score, strengths and weaknesses, an accompanying mini review or second opinion and the full written review. This gives the reader a choice of how much time he will invest in the review. If the score is a 6.5 he may just look at that and say "I'll skip it" or he can read the full review to see if it might be something worth picking up.

whoknows
08-27-2007, 10:59 PM
The scores for the games I'm interested in are good.

Warhawk
Heavenly Sword
Sonic

The Bioshock scores make me want to get a new video card, but I cant bring myself to do it :-P

Rei no Otaku
08-27-2007, 11:35 PM
If the score is a 6.5 he may just look at that and say "I'll skip it"
Hence why there shouldn't be scores. I don't give a rat's ass what anyone thinks about a game. I want to know how it plays, if it's buggy, what the plot is about, etc. Whether or not the reviewer likes the game is completely irrelevant.

whoknows
08-28-2007, 01:56 AM
Wonder why no Stranglehold review

whoknows
08-28-2007, 01:57 AM
Hence why there shouldn't be scores. I don't give a rat's ass what anyone thinks about a game. I want to know how it plays, if it's buggy, what the plot is about, etc. Whether or not the reviewer likes the game is completely irrelevant.
And a lot of EGM reviews don't include most of that which is why I dislike their reviews.

SpreadTheWord
08-28-2007, 11:46 AM
Hence why there shouldn't be scores. I don't give a rat's ass what anyone thinks about a game. I want to know how it plays, if it's buggy, what the plot is about, etc. Whether or not the reviewer likes the game is completely irrelevant.

But you don't have to pay attention to the score. It sounds like the only thing you are interested in is the written review. So why would you care if there is a score or not?

I don't play many RPGs but I like to play FPSs. If I see an RPG get a 7.5 I won't even read the review but if I see an FPS get the same score I'm more inclined to read it. There are countless examples of gamers making a big deal out of scores but if they are used as only a first look indicator of quality than there is no need to do away with them.

Rei no Otaku
08-28-2007, 12:02 PM
I completely agree. But sadly many gamers, as seen in this thread, refuse to even bother with the written review. My hope, and a silly one I know, is that if there were no scores people would be more inclined to try new games.

trq
08-28-2007, 12:34 PM
I completely agree. But sadly many gamers, as seen in this thread, refuse to even bother with the written review. My hope, and a silly one I know, is that if there were no scores people would be more inclined to try new games.

I hear that. People should be more willing to try new kinds of games, movies, books, food, music, and so on, across the board.

That said, though, I think you're wrong about reviewers trying to get you to "hate" games. It's their job to call out developers when they're lazy, and it's in all our best interests that they do so. But here's a little secret: you're allowed to like crap. There's nothing wrong with that. I like plenty of crap music, food, and movies, and I have a weird affection for all kinds of mediocre-at-best games: XIII, Spartan: Total War, the first Def Jam game, Path of Neo, and so on. But thinking that they deserve high scores just because I like them misses the point entirely. Hell, there are a million people who liked 50 Cent: Bulletproof enough to buy it. Think about that.

Anyway, this comes up every time there's a review thread. The sooner people get over the whole "I like it = it's good" fallacy, the better.

elwood731
08-28-2007, 12:39 PM
I completely agree. But sadly many gamers, as seen in this thread, refuse to even bother with the written review. My hope, and a silly one I know, is that if there were no scores people would be more inclined to try new games.
I don't think scores alone keep gamers from trying new games. People are the same way with movies, books, CDs, etc. Why do you think John Grisham is so successful? It surely isn't because of his great writing ability. There's far better writers. At the same time, scores do help people avoid complete disasters. I actually enjoyed Turok 2 at the time, but the scores have warned me away from the sequels. If a game is getting 5s and 4s everywhere that's pretty good indicator to me.

Actually, the best thing to ever happen to the game market (in some ways, and not in some ways) is the downloadable demo. I can still remember trying and then buying Virtua Tennis on the DC simply because of the demo. I can't imagine ever being interested in a tennis game until I played that. Same now with many game demos on 360. I know Crackdown got some mixed reviews, but I loved the demo and am loving the full game now.

Getting rid of scores wouldn't change much, except make reviews even more cryptic (considering they too are usually poorly written).

Rei no Otaku
08-28-2007, 12:52 PM
It's just that I really don't see the need for reviews. I use previews and watch gameplay videos to learn about games. I don't use a single review to determine what I buy. And I buy a lot of games too. I post here, but I'm very far from cheap. I'll buy on average, 5 new games a month. Out of all those games I buy I might play 1-3 horrible games a year. Also out of all those games I can't even imagine how many I wouldn't have enjoyed if I had listened to reviews, and not purcased them.

A good example is Project Sylpheed. I loved that game. It didn't get get good scores, and I'm not saying it deserved them. But it just makes me sad because there might be other people out there who would have loved it as well if the score were just removed from the reviews, and they read the text.

I understand what you're saying, but for someone like me who doesn't use them at all, it's hard to understand how they can sway people's decisions so much. Anyway, I'm sorry for derailing the thread.

elwood731
08-28-2007, 01:08 PM
It's just that I really don't see the need for reviews. I use previews and watch gameplay videos to learn about games. I don't use a single review to determine what I buy. And I buy a lot of games too. I post here, but I'm very far from cheap. I'll buy on average, 5 new games a month. Out of all those games I buy I might play 1-3 horrible games a year. Also out of all those games I can't even imagine how many I wouldn't have enjoyed if I had listened to reviews, and not purcased them.

A good example is Project Sylpheed. I loved that game. It didn't get get good scores, and I'm not saying it deserved them. But it just makes me sad because there might be other people out there who would have loved it as well if the score were just removed from the reviews, and they read the text.

I understand what you're saying, but for someone like me who doesn't use them at all, it's hard to understand how they can sway people's decisions so much. Anyway, I'm sorry for derailing the thread.
That's cool that reviews aren't useful for you, but they are for many people who buy a game a month, or even less. If you're only buying a new game every 2-3 months, then reviews are certainly a huge help in knowing if something is worth it. I think they also sometimes tip you off to a game you would never have tried. In my case, that was the original Warhawk at the PS1's launch. It got such great reviews I had to try it.

It's certainly a mixed bag, but like I said, I think demos are making it easier for people to go out on a limb against review scores because they actually get to try the game. I know Bioshock's demo sold a lot of people on the game moreso than any review's score or text.

shieryda
08-28-2007, 02:49 PM
Guys, the new Game Informer just arrived at EB/Gamestop, so subscribers should be getting theirs soon.

tangytangerine
08-28-2007, 03:18 PM
Guys, the new Game Informer just arrived at EB/Gamestop, so subscribers should be getting theirs soon.

Yeah, just read their forum and there's people bitching that it's nearly the end of the month and still have not received the september issue. Utter BS that it takes them this long to send them out.

Especially since their site said people should've been receiving them around the 15th. If it wasn't for the fact that I paid for that subscription, I wouldn't give a damn. But since I paid $15 for a year, I expect every damn issue to be delivered.

For those wondering about the September scores, someone posted them already on their site. Here's what the scores are:
Game of the Month
Bioshock (360) 10/10
Note: PC version was not reviewed

Handheld Game of the Month
Picross DS (DS) 9.5/9

PC Game of the Month
Sid Meier's Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword (PC) 9.5/9.5

Reviews
Bioshock (360) 10/10
Madden NFL 08 (PS3, 360) 8/8 Note: Wii version unavailable to review
Nascar 08 (PS3, 360) 7.75/8
Tiger Woods PGA Tour 08 (PS3, 360) 9/9 Note: Wii version unavailable to review
Transformers (PS3, 360, Wii) 7.25/7
Ratatouille (Wii, PS2, Gamecube) 5.5/5.5
Ratatouille (360) 6.75/7
Blue Dragon (360) 9/8.75
Project Sylpheed (360) 7.75/7.5
Wartech: Senko No Ronde (360) 3.75
Hour of Victory (360) 2.5
Vampire Rain (360) 3/2.75
Eternal Sonata (360) 8.25/8
Lair (PS3) 7.25/8
Mario Strikers Charged (Wii) 7.25/7
Pokemon Battle Revolution (Wii) 5.75/6
Sid Meier's Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword (PC) 9.5/9.5
Dead Head Fred (PSP) 6/6
Picross DS (DS) 9.5/9
Brain Age 2: More Training in Minutes a Day (DS) 8.25/8.25
Jeanne d'Arc (PSP) 8.5/8
Heroes of Mana (DS) 5/5
Brave Story: New Traveler (PSP) 7.25
Brothers in Arms DS (DS) 6.75
Luminous Arc (DS) 6
Monster Hunter Freedom 2 (PSP) 7
Smash Court Tennis 3 (PSP) 8.5

whoknows
08-28-2007, 04:04 PM
Yeah, just read their forum and there's people bitching that it's nearly the end of the month and still have not received the september issue. Utter BS that it takes them this long to send them out.

Especially since their site said people should've been receiving them around the 15th. If it wasn't for the fact that I paid for that subscription, I wouldn't give a damn. But since I paid $15 for a year, I expect every damn issue to be delivered.

For those wondering about the September scores, someone posted them already on their site. Here's what the scores are:
Game of the Month
Bioshock (360) 10/10
Note: PC version was not reviewed

Handheld Game of the Month
Picross DS (DS) 9.5/9

PC Game of the Month
Sid Meier's Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword (PC) 9.5/9.5

Reviews
Bioshock (360) 10/10
Madden NFL 08 (PS3, 360) 8/8 Note: Wii version unavailable to review
Nascar 08 (PS3, 360) 7.75/8
Tiger Woods PGA Tour 08 (PS3, 360) 9/9 Note: Wii version unavailable to review
Transformers (PS3, 360, Wii) 7.25/7
Ratatouille (Wii, PS2, Gamecube) 5.5/5.5
Ratatouille (360) 6.75/7
Blue Dragon (360) 9/8.75
Project Sylpheed (360) 7.75/7.5
Wartech: Senko No Ronde (360) 3.75
Hour of Victory (360) 2.5
Vampire Rain (360) 3/2.75
Eternal Sonata (360) 8.25/8
Lair (PS3) 7.25/8
Mario Strikers Charged (Wii) 7.25/7
Pokemon Battle Revolution (Wii) 5.75/6
Sid Meier's Civilization IV: Beyond the Sword (PC) 9.5/9.5
Dead Head Fred (PSP) 6/6
Picross DS (DS) 9.5/9
Brain Age 2: More Training in Minutes a Day (DS) 8.25/8.25
Jeanne d'Arc (PSP) 8.5/8
Heroes of Mana (DS) 5/5
Brave Story: New Traveler (PSP) 7.25
Brothers in Arms DS (DS) 6.75
Luminous Arc (DS) 6
Monster Hunter Freedom 2 (PSP) 7
Smash Court Tennis 3 (PSP) 8.5
Vampire Rain score :lol:

I remember thinking it looked cool a long time ago.

LAIR score seems ok. Can't wait to get it this Friday.

Rozz
08-28-2007, 04:11 PM
Back around 2002-early 2003 (before the redesign) EGM had nice big reviews. Smaller font, most space, less huge pictures for the ADD crowd. They used to have a ton of text to describe most of the games and then they had all 3 reviewiers give their thoughts, in addition to rating graphics, sound, game play, replay, etc.

The magazine now is small, POS that has more pictures and ads than actual text. If it wasn't for free then I wouldn't bother with it.

And no, I didn't receive my fucking Game Informer or EGM's for September either. What's going on here?

eswat
08-28-2007, 04:12 PM
Vampire Rain score :lol:

I remember thinking it looked cool a long time ago.
The title alone alarmed me of its possible suspect quality :P I also found it funny that a couple retailers got the title confused and would call it Rain Vampire.

whoknows
08-28-2007, 04:14 PM
The title alone alarmed me of its possible suspect quality :P I also found it funny that a couple retailers got the title confused and would call it Rain Vampire.
Rain Vampire would have been better.

Just imagine, you are walking through the streets then suddenly "Oh shit! Its raining vampires! Get to cover!!"

That would have been Badass

Ikohn4ever
08-28-2007, 04:18 PM
cant confirm them 100%, but here are the rumors

Rumors:
Castlevania coming to ps3/360.
Kingdom Hearts compilations across many platforms (all prequels)
Open World Batman game that won't suck is coming
Wii ware games will be tiny, like 16 bit tiny due to storage.

elwood731
08-28-2007, 04:37 PM
cant confirm them 100%, but here are the rumors

Rumors:
Castlevania coming to ps3/360.
I hope this is 2D. Please let it be 2D with a budget and entirely newly drawn sprites, or even 3D models on a 2D plane.

Kingdom Hearts compilations across many platforms (all prequels)
This...would be interesting. They'd be able to print money with this series on all platforms. Really, Square is losing out by not doing it. Still, I can't imagine this is true. It would be more likely, I think, if they did this for the Wii since the next game makes sense for that system.

Open World Batman game that won't suck is coming
They say that about EVERY Batman game, and yet everyone does. Let the Crackdown developers have a crack at it.

Wii ware games will be tiny, like 16 bit tiny due to storage.
This makes sense.

-Never4ever-
08-28-2007, 08:01 PM
Luminous Arc is far from crap... When it comes to RPGs reviewers don't know shit. My favorite RPG this year after Persona 3 is Ar Tonelico. I think we all know how well that did with reviewers. Eternal Sonata and Wild Arms 5=Day 1 purchases. And I know I'll enjoy almost every minute of both.

I don't understand this "I really wanted to get this game, and I enjoyed the demo. But some random person I don't know from Adam said he didn't like it. Guess I won't get it!" mentality. If you think a game looks good then give it a try. You'll be surprised how many times you end up loving something the press tries to tell you to hate.

As an RPG fanatic, I've learned that a game I liked and a game that's actually good is two separate thing. If you're an RPG fanboy such as myself, you pretty much add 2-5 points to every RPG EGM reviews.

RelentlessRolento
08-28-2007, 09:33 PM
With all that's been said, I'm in the same boat as Rei... 90% of my stuff I pick up get poor reviews, but I have enjoyed them alot more than most high scoring games. Most of this is due to research I do before getting any of my games.

R1V3R5
08-28-2007, 09:48 PM
Any details on why they rated Eternal Sonata the way they did? That "Tales" style gameplay is exactly what I think the 360 is missing right now and I had all intention of getting it.

PyroGamer
08-28-2007, 09:54 PM
EGM was going to dock Warhawk a point if it was over $30 correct? So are those scores really a 9.5, 8, 9.5?
That was IGN, I believe. But even if it was EGM, it would be only ONE reviewer's score going up.

SpreadTheWord
08-29-2007, 12:59 AM
I hope this is 2D. Please let it be 2D with a budget and entirely newly drawn sprites, or even 3D models on a 2D plane.
I hope the game is an XBLA/download service game. That way it can have a lower budget and be the same style as the new PSP game. The last thing a Castlevania fan would want is a big next-gen Castlevania game that sells like crap and makes Konami never try again.

Apossum
08-29-2007, 01:51 AM
Wartech: Senko No Ronde (360) 3.75


man, all critics went way too harsh on this game. easily one of the most unique and fun 360 games out now.

dschroll
08-29-2007, 01:59 AM
Careful on Heavenly Sword. I've heard its a 6 hour game. $60 for a 6 hour game just is too much IMO.

Maynard
08-29-2007, 02:20 AM
Careful on Heavenly Sword. I've heard its a 6 hour game. $60 for a 6 hour game just is too much IMO.

Depends. Not trying to defend Heavenly Sword, but if there is a game out there that is amazing and 6 hours long it is worth $60. Too many people require games to be SUPER long, I'd rather play an amazing 6 - 10 hour game that is amazing top to bottom I would take it. It isn't always about the quanity it is moreso about the quality.

dallow
08-29-2007, 02:49 AM
Careful on Heavenly Sword. I've heard its a 6 hour game. $60 for a 6 hour game just is too much IMO.I think Gears is worth $60 even without multiplayer.

ICO was worth $50 to me too.

Richlough
08-29-2007, 02:10 PM
I think Gears is worth $60 even without multiplayer.

ICO was worth $50 to me too.

Careful there , it almost sounds like an Xbox 360 compliment . ;)

dallow
08-29-2007, 02:19 PM
Careful there , it almost sounds like an Xbox 360 compliment . ;)Hehe, I have a 360. I've sold it to my cousin to get a premium with HDMI however.

Want to settle this in SFII? ;)

Dark Slayer120
08-29-2007, 02:21 PM
Depends. Not trying to defend Heavenly Sword, but if there is a game out there that is amazing and 6 hours long it is worth $60. Too many people require games to be SUPER long, I'd rather play an amazing 6 - 10 hour game that is amazing top to bottom I would take it. It isn't always about the quanity it is moreso about the quality.

Totally agreed. I plan on getting Heavenly Sword regardless of the scores. I have been anxious to play this game since I played the demo. Also dallow makes a good point I thought both of those games were worth $50-$60 and there were around 6-7 hrs. IMO if you're interested in something then give it a shot, don't just avoid it because it gets low scores. Maybe rent it or buy it cheap if it gets low scores everywhere, but not to try a game you were wanting to because someone else didn't like it is dumb.

Richlough
08-29-2007, 02:59 PM
Hehe, I have a 360. I've sold it to my cousin to get a premium with HDMI however.

Want to settle this in SFII? ;)

No , I suck at fighting games . :lol:

PyroGamer
08-29-2007, 03:40 PM
Careful on Heavenly Sword. I've heard its a 6 hour game. $60 for a 6 hour game just is too much IMO.
This is why there are videogame rental stores.

Hell, BioShock was 20+ hours and I'm still glad I only rented it.

Rozz
08-29-2007, 05:34 PM
This is why there are videogame rental stores.

Hell, BioShock was 20+ hours and I'm still glad I only rented it.

I don't mind short games (in fact, I actually prefer them to super long ones), but I'll wait for the price on them to come down first because $60 doesen't justify a 6 hour experience imo.

SpecTrE3353
08-30-2007, 01:44 PM
This is why there are videogame rental stores.

Hell, BioShock was 20+ hours and I'm still glad I only rented it.

Some of us busier folks can't finish a 20+ hour game in a single rental :P

Hell, it took me at least a month just to get through RE4... getting older sucks.

zewone
08-30-2007, 05:09 PM
Who gave heavenly sword a 9? I bet it was shane.
Good call.

Just got my EGM today.

FriskyTanuki
09-02-2007, 07:02 PM
That was IGN, I believe. But even if it was EGM, it would be only ONE reviewer's score going up.
It was only one of the reviewers at 1up/EGM (the first 8.5) and it seems like he wrote his review again, as it seems more fitting to the score and not like a mis-scored review.

cant confirm them 100%, but here are the rumors

Rumors:
Castlevania coming to ps3/360.
Kingdom Hearts compilations across many platforms (all prequels)
Open World Batman game that won't suck is coming
Wii ware games will be tiny, like 16 bit tiny due to storage.

Those are pretty much correct. The Castlevania one just says "a console version of Castlevania," so take that as you please.

I've also got the smaller Q-Tips:

-Naughty Dog will be working on Jak and Daxter 4 after Uncharted's done.
-The PSP version of The Elder Scrolls is cancelled.
-Okami coming to the Wii.
-A popular broken-up band will re-unite, just for Guitar Hero III.

whoknows
09-02-2007, 07:05 PM
It was only one of the reviewers at 1up/EGM (the first 8.5) and it seems like he wrote his review again, as it seems more fitting to the score and not like a mis-scored review.



Those are pretty much correct. The Castlevania one just says "a console version of Castlevania," so take that as you please.

I've also got the smaller Q-Tips:

-Naughty Dog will be working on Jak and Daxter 4 after Uncharted's done.
-The PSP version of The Elder Scrolls is cancelled.
-Okami coming to the Wii.
-A popular broken-up band will re-unite, just for Guitar Hero III.
1. Oh God please let it be true. I loved the Jak games (Jak and Daxter not so much).
2. Meh
3. Meh
4. N'Sync :pray:

SpreadTheWord
09-03-2007, 10:59 PM
I've also got the smaller Q-Tips:

-Naughty Dog will be working on Jak and Daxter 4 after Uncharted's done.
-The PSP version of The Elder Scrolls is cancelled.
-Okami coming to the Wii.
-A popular broken-up band will re-unite, just for Guitar Hero III.

- Just when I was starting to fear that the end of platformers was upon us. Now all I need is a new Sly game and I'll be happy.
- I've seen this rumor before. The game never seemed like a good idea
- I thought this was already announced.
- I love this competition between Rock Band and GH3. First one to get AC/DC wins.

FriskyTanuki
09-03-2007, 11:08 PM
- I thought this was already announced.
Nope, just rumored.