One Russian Jet Crashes, Second Missing

[MorPhiend]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,129919,00.html

[MorPhiend]

It says that one of the jets were headed toward Pres. Putin (the one that vanished).

[punqsux]

its a mat, with diffrent conclusions on it that you can JUMP to!

[PsyClerk]

In Soviet Russia, plane crashes you!

[Jaket]

its a mat, with diffrent conclusions on it that you can JUMP to!


HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH LMAO

THAT MOVIE IS THE BEST

"thats the worst idea i have ever heard"

[guardian_owl]

In Soviet Russia, plane crashes you!

HAHAHAHA, I saw his show in Branson, funny, funny stuff.

[jbroush99]

In Soviet Russia, plane crashes you!

What is this from? I remember hearing it but can't remember where.

[Kaijufan]

In Soviet Russia, plane crashes you!

What is this from? I remember hearing it but can't remember where.
Family Guy.
In Soviet Russia, car drives you!

[BigSpoonyBard]

Yakov Smirvov, or whatever that guy's name was. comedian back in the 80's

[guardian_owl]

In Soviet Russia, plane crashes you!

What is this from? I remember hearing it but can't remember where.
Family Guy.
In Soviet Russia, car drives you!

Ahh, but do you know who's comedy it's based off of? Yakov Smirnoff (http://www.funnyphilosopher.com/show.html)

[SneakyPenguin]

Heh, such a depressing topic turns into a ton of jokes.

[Kaijufan]

In Soviet Russia, plane crashes you!

What is this from? I remember hearing it but can't remember where.
Family Guy.
In Soviet Russia, car drives you!

Ahh, but do you know who's comedy it's based off of? Yakov Smirnoff (http://www.funnyphilosopher.com/show.html)
You learn something new every day. :)

[peteloaf]

Just read on CNN.com that the wreckage of the second plane was foud...

[Quackzilla]

Ack, using CNN and FOX news as sources? This world is going to hell!

Here is the REAL story, without bullshit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3596354.stm

[epobirs]

Ack, using CNN and FOX news as sources? This world is going to hell!

Here is the REAL story, without bullshit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3596354.stm

Why yes, because the BBC would never slant a story.

This isn't political, nimrod. The news outlets are just offering what coming off the wire services with feet on the ground at or near the scene.

[punqsux]

Ack, using CNN and FOX news as sources? This world is going to hell!

Here is the REAL story, without bullshit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3596354.stm

Why yes, because the BBC would never slant a story.

This isn't political, nimrod. The news outlets are just offering what coming off the wire services with feet on the ground at or near the scene.

well the fox trademarked "authorities have not ruled out terrorism" quote was in there. i mean sure it could have been terrorism, it could have been an accident, lets wait and see rather than saw what it could be.

its little things like that in the media that keep people in check with "terror" you never know where they're comming from as long as they slip that little quote in there.

thats pretty much the reason ive dissociated myself from news media, its all bias. most of it right, some of it left, but rarley do you get the facts and get to judge for yourself, which is a shame, but such is the way of the world.

[CheapyD]

Report: Russian Jet Sent Hijack Signal
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&u=/ap/20040825/ap_on_re_eu/russia_plane_crash_040825030642

[epobirs]

Ack, using CNN and FOX news as sources? This world is going to hell!

Here is the REAL story, without bullshit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3596354.stm

Why yes, because the BBC would never slant a story.

This isn't political, nimrod. The news outlets are just offering what coming off the wire services with feet on the ground at or near the scene.

well the fox trademarked "authorities have not ruled out terrorism" quote was in there. i mean sure it could have been terrorism, it could have been an accident, lets wait and see rather than saw what it could be.

its little things like that in the media that keep people in check with "terror" you never know where they're comming from as long as they slip that little quote in there.

thats pretty much the reason ive dissociated myself from news media, its all bias. most of it right, some of it left, but rarley do you get the facts and get to judge for yourself, which is a shame, but such is the way of the world.

Oh, get serious. If any news outlet ran a story post 9/11 about a airliner crash without examining the angle of malicious human intervention the entire audience would wonder what the hell wa wrong with them. Mentioning that an area of question remains unanswerable for the moment is far better than ignoring it when you know full well it's on the minds of the readers. This is hardly conspiracy mongering.

[crazytalkx]

Whoa this is turning into a huge conspiracy thing.......and remember In Russia cold catches you!!

[punqsux]

Ack, using CNN and FOX news as sources? This world is going to hell!

Here is the REAL story, without bullshit.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3596354.stm

Why yes, because the BBC would never slant a story.

This isn't political, nimrod. The news outlets are just offering what coming off the wire services with feet on the ground at or near the scene.

well the fox trademarked "authorities have not ruled out terrorism" quote was in there. i mean sure it could have been terrorism, it could have been an accident, lets wait and see rather than saw what it could be.

its little things like that in the media that keep people in check with "terror" you never know where they're comming from as long as they slip that little quote in there.

thats pretty much the reason ive dissociated myself from news media, its all bias. most of it right, some of it left, but rarley do you get the facts and get to judge for yourself, which is a shame, but such is the way of the world.

Oh, get serious. If any news outlet ran a story post 9/11 about a airliner crash without examining the angle of malicious human intervention the entire audience would wonder what the hell wa wrong with them. Mentioning that an area of question remains unanswerable for the moment is far better than ignoring it when you know full well it's on the minds of the readers. This is hardly conspiracy mongering.

its not a conspiracy, its marketing and its fear. nothing as elaborate as a conspiracy is needed, so dont be so over dramatic.

fox says the word "terror" which after sept 11th is driven into our skull. so people watch to see if it was terror. they also watch some sweet commercials that rake in the $ for news channels.

if news channels can create a feeling that something might happen at any time, you better watch our news for updates, the get bank off that.

they dont have to "make up" news stories, or lie about anything. all they have to do is say terror a couple times an hour and it hooks some viewers.

[Wlogan31]

Man, this is some nutty stuff...