PDA

View Full Version : Red Robin Instant Win $10 gift card (with almost useless coupon if you don't)


boagman
07-01-2009, 01:25 AM
www.redrobininstantwin.com (http://www.redrobininstantwin.com)

You have to sign up (it's quick), and you're limited to one entry (it's free) per day, unless you send the link to someone else, in which case they'll let you enter one more time on a given day.

Winners receive a $10 RR gift card, but I've been doing this one for at least a week, and haven't won one yet. When you lose, you can print out their not-very-generous coupon for ONE free bottomless beverage with the purchase of TWO burgers, which is pretty crappy. I haven't even bothered.

Still, if someone out there can win this, I'd be happy. Especially if it was me! ;)

doodle777_98
07-01-2009, 08:56 AM
Dont they always have bottomless beverages.

jlewis13
07-01-2009, 09:05 AM
i played this last year and won a gift card thanks op

DrBrianFields
07-01-2009, 12:23 PM
Dont they always have bottomless beverages.


Yes, but they aren't free. Considering the cost of one of these beverages to the store is about 10¢ and they charge about $2 for them, buying two burgers to get one soda/tea/whatever is pretty crap. It'd be worlds better if they said buy two burgers get two beverages free because at that point you're already spending $20, and $25 if you get fries.

boagman
07-01-2009, 03:25 PM
Yes, but they aren't free. Considering the cost of one of these beverages to the store is about 10¢ and they charge about $2 for them, buying two burgers to get one soda/tea/whatever is pretty crap. It'd be worlds better if they said buy two burgers get two beverages free because at that point you're already spending $20, and $25 if you get fries.

Actually, bottomless fries are included in the cost of all the burgers/sandwiches they serve, but you're exactly right at what I was hinting at: it really should be a coupon for *2* free bottomless beverages with the purchase of 2 burgers. That'd be at least marginally acceptable. As it stands, the coupon itself just irks me, but I felt it needed to be mentioned anyway.