View Full Version : Why is everyone so effing over-sensitive?
Javery
11-18-2004, 12:38 PM
Why does everyone like to pretend that they don't drink, swear or have sex? Someone please explain to me what the big deal is. The FCC is out of control and now players, coaches and owners in the NFL (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1925333) are acting like pansies. Jesus, most people swear in their everyday life (or at least hear it constantly) and everyone on the planet wants to have sex (it is why we're here, right? Admit it, you're thinking about sex right now, arent you?). Half the population has boobs yet flashing one on TV for a second is a sign the world is ending. WTF? /end of rant (for now).
Sartori
11-18-2004, 12:41 PM
Because America is spiraling down to a dark and gloomy pit of censorship and political correction?
Hadn't you noticed yet?
doubledown
11-18-2004, 12:44 PM
Yeah, this is a rant that has been going on for a LONG time now. It is just dumb...but when people call the FCC to complain, they are just as bad.
musha666
11-18-2004, 12:49 PM
I think the biggest load of crap in that is "Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy found it racially offensive."
Give me a break.
But yea, it is getting pretty ridiculous.
That's why I just don't bother to watch tv anymore.
Wshakspear
11-18-2004, 12:50 PM
Minority rules
The Shiznit
11-18-2004, 12:56 PM
I think the biggest load of crap in that is "Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy found it racially offensive."
Give me a break.
But yea, it is getting pretty ridiculous.
That's why I just don't bother to watch tv anymore.
Why did Dungy have to complain about race. Would Dungy have cared if Nicole jumped in Manning's arms? So does that mean if it had been a hot black girl like Tyra everythings ok.
People need to stop complaining about the little things and worry about the big issues.
Arakias
11-18-2004, 01:01 PM
Check this out:
http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2004_11_15.html#008481
3 people complaining instigated a $1.2 million fine against Fox.
musha666
11-18-2004, 01:02 PM
You said it Shiznit.
Who cares about all the americans dying overseas right now, theres a college football player saying 'F***' on my TV. Someone do something...
People really do need to step back a bit and see what the real problems are and stop with the petty nonsense.
I
daikaiju
11-18-2004, 01:03 PM
Minority rules
I'm offended!!!! I'm in the majority!!
Wshakspear
11-18-2004, 01:07 PM
Minority rules
I'm offended!!!! I'm in the majority!!
Aww shit...the FCC black helicopter is landing in our parking lot...again...
Weedy649
11-18-2004, 01:10 PM
Its because families watch football too. I was in night class monday when this happend but my uncle whom i stay with during the week watches football and his daughter is usually around. Sure adults dont mind but they do if they have children around when all of a sudden...BAM T.O. getting a T.D. off the field lol. FCC doesnt totally suck guys, if you want to watch unedited stuff you can watch a movie or channels you pay for.
Will someone please think about the children!
Lootr2Core
11-18-2004, 01:13 PM
I woulnd't say I was 'offended' but I don't think that it was appropriate and added nothing to the football game. I have 2 small boys and I like to know what we are watching, when I sit down with them to watch a football game that is what I expect to see. If I wanted to watch desperate housewives I would.
The Shiznit
11-18-2004, 01:15 PM
Its because families watch football too. I was in night class monday when this happend but my uncle whom i stay with during the week watches football and his daughter is usually around. Sure adults dont mind but they do if they have children around when all of a sudden...BAM T.O. getting a T.D. off the field lol. FCC doesnt totally suck guys, if you want to watch unedited stuff you can watch a movie or channels you pay for.
Will someone please think about the children!
But there was no nudity involved.
daikaiju
11-18-2004, 01:16 PM
Minority rules
I'm offended!!!! I'm in the majority!!
Aww shit...the FCC black helicopter is landing in our parking lot...again...
for the record...
/sarcasm
Indiana
11-18-2004, 01:19 PM
I'm offended that I did not get to see full frontal nudity when she dropped the towel! :D
Indiana
11-18-2004, 01:21 PM
American has become polar opposites. Overly conservative and overly liberal. We cannot find a nice happy medium to rest at. I'm sick of all the BS about not showing programs such as Saving Private Ryan on public TV. If you are offended change the FUCKING channel! And if it is after 10pm your children shouldn't be up watching the TV anyhow! <steps off soap box>
musha666
11-18-2004, 01:22 PM
I could see if the girl was actually naked and they showed it. I could see people thinking that is not appropriate for their children.
They show more skin in a JC Penny catalogue or in the flyer for any store that sells bras. No one is 'offended' by that though.
punqsux
11-18-2004, 01:36 PM
just abolish all tv and radio...make people read. make people think for themselves for the first time in their lives.
Javery
11-18-2004, 01:39 PM
just abolish all tv and radio...make people read. make people think for themselves for the first time in their lives.
But if there was no TV what would I watch?
manofpeace20
11-18-2004, 01:42 PM
I don't find it offensive at all, in fact I wish I watched that part of the pre-game. But if the game was rated TV-PG or something like that, they can't show something like that. It is like watching a Disney movie and having Mickey cut off Goofys balls with a dull razor. See my point?
musha666
11-18-2004, 01:46 PM
They didnt show anything though.
I didnt watch the game, but I am sure that there were some beer commercials or ads for some other products during the game that were worse than this was.
punqsux
11-18-2004, 01:46 PM
just abolish all tv and radio...make people read. make people think for themselves for the first time in their lives.
But if there was no TV what would I watch?
well the first part of my post was in jest, as the american public would never accept such a drastic change of life.
the average adult watches tv for 7 hours a day, if that was just ripped away fromt hem, what would they do? read? listen to music? spend time learning who their kids are?
tv is weak anyways...anything you can watch on broadcast television you can watch at your leasure with no commercials on dvd...
Othergods
11-18-2004, 01:49 PM
just abolish all tv and radio...make people read. make people think for themselves for the first time in their lives.
But if there was no TV what would I watch?
Paint Dry?
Seriously though I hate all of the pre-monday night crap that they show and it was not offensive. Lets look at it this way a girl in a 2 piece bathing suit shown from behind hugging a guy. Does that little string across the back make it not offensive?
supadupacheap
11-18-2004, 01:52 PM
I don't find it offensive at all, in fact I wish I watched that part of the pre-game. But if the game was rated TV-PG or something like that, they can't show something like that. It is like watching a Disney movie and having Mickey cut off Goofys balls with a dull razor. See my point?
Now THATS entertainment!!!
Wshakspear
11-18-2004, 01:52 PM
Minority rules
I'm offended!!!! I'm in the majority!!
Aww shit...the FCC black helicopter is landing in our parking lot...again...
for the record...
/sarcasm
for the record....
/no black helicopter
jlarlee
11-18-2004, 01:58 PM
Stuff like this occurs in cycles similar to fashion. Just look back in history the ultra conservative 50's turned into the crazy late 60's. We are probably at the conservative high tide right now pretty soon we will start moving in the other direction. This thread makes me want to read Fahrenheirt 451 again.
rajchakrabarti
11-18-2004, 02:01 PM
Still parents should be responsible for thier kids.. ok this was unexpected.. but its not like you are going to shelter your kids forever.. and a good parent could explain the situation to kid.
Instead you have sheltered kids that don't know how to handle race..sex or religion when they grow up. Let them deal with it.... You know your kid is gonna see it on TV,, no matter what.
I think the clip was really just stupid, but the fact it gets blown up.. just brings more attention to it.
Parents argue..well what am i gonna tell my kid ? What was on it ? a white chick jumping into TO's arms. Unless your kid already has an idea of sex, then they would really have no clue whats going on. And if they could figure it out, then where did they get the initial idea from ?
JimmieMac
11-18-2004, 02:01 PM
Everytime I see a kid on a bike wearing a helmet I cry a bit inside. THe possibility of falling off your bike and cracking your skull open is part of growing up but now all the kids wear these helmets that are 4 times the size of their head and their bodies are completly covered in bubble wrap.
Javery
11-18-2004, 02:02 PM
Everytime I see a kid on a bike wearing a helmet I cry a bit inside. THe possibility of falling off your bike and cracking your skull open is part of growing up but now all the kids wear these helmets that are 4 times the size of their head and their bodies are completly covered in bubble wrap.
Amen.
blueaurora
11-18-2004, 02:04 PM
I rarely drop by and post but I have to admit. America doesn't have an identity. Political correctness and the liberals taking over the judicial system is what makes independants and moderate republicans have to stand with the ultra conservitives.
As it stands these days Democrats are Socialist and before someone goes and tries to flame me look up the definition of a socialist (Communist) and compare them to what you see to day in the stances and policies in the left. Once things have gotten out of hand socialism will have to be cleaned up and transformed into a Communist state. There is no other way to fix it unless you rebel and remake the entire system or turn communist.
Republicans feel an obligation to enforce some sort of moral line even if it is a line drawn in the sand. There are many other issues they don't agree on but I do think that sex is a natural thing and shouldn't be pulled under the rug but it shouldn't be exploited either. We as a society right now because we exploit it. (Mostly do to the conservative enviroment that both sides both directly and indrectly create)
You want to see change. You want to see the middle. Get rid of the socialists and ignore the far right, be vocal about the natural things of life and the need to control everything.
By the way you know the Govenment's only power was meant to make war not much else. I believe it was Alexander Hamilton that said the powers we have given the federal government are few and finite. Finite my ass. Look how socialist we have already become. What doesn't the socialst dictate? States should dictate what their citizens should do and not do. That should happen through your elected officals and people that represent YOU not someone from MAS. or TEXAS. That way if you don't like what they enforce you can move to a different one. That is the way it was meant to be. We are nolonger the United States of America. We are America. State government is a Joke. They have control of next to nothing.
Man ... I am bound to get burned off of this lol.
Seriously the whole thing is our politians faults (Both sides) Our founding fathers would piss their pants if they could see us now.
punqsux
11-18-2004, 02:05 PM
Everytime I see a kid on a bike wearing a helmet I cry a bit inside. THe possibility of falling off your bike and cracking your skull open is part of growing up but now all the kids wear these helmets that are 4 times the size of their head and their bodies are completly covered in bubble wrap.
i have to disagree with this, bike helmets saves many lives every year, your statement is like saying seat belts are bad because everyone should get in a wreck.
ill admit other bike saftey gear (elbow/knee pads, ect.) it just overboard but helmets definetly are a good thing...that being said, i bike everywhere i dont own a helmet, so wht do i know?
Alpha2
11-18-2004, 02:08 PM
It's all Janet Jackson's breast's fault.
dcfox
11-18-2004, 02:09 PM
Everytime I see a kid on a bike wearing a helmet I cry a bit inside. THe possibility of falling off your bike and cracking your skull open is part of growing up but now all the kids wear these helmets that are 4 times the size of their head and their bodies are completly covered in bubble wrap.
i have to disagree with this, bike helmets saves many lives every year, your statement is like saying seat belts are bad because everyone should get in a wreck.
ill admit other bike saftey gear (elbow/knee pads, ect.) it just overboard but helmets definetly are a good thing...that being said, i bike everywhere i dont own a helmet, so wht do i know?
I wear a helmet all the time and I don't even have a bike. So who knows how many times I've cheated death by doing this.
z1ggyp00p
11-18-2004, 02:10 PM
I, for one, simply cannot stand the suggestion of a woman wanting to have sex with a man when I'm trying to enjoy some nice big sweaty men grappling and beatiing each other with my kids. Look, it's real simple:
burly men can touch, rub, and beat other burly men (atheletes)
sexy ladies can touch, rub, and beat other sexy ladies (cheerleaders, beer commercials)
Sexy ladies and burly men MUST NOT INTERACT IN ANY WAY!
Sincerely,
America
Arakias
11-18-2004, 02:13 PM
nice first post z1ggyp00p.
Wshakspear
11-18-2004, 02:15 PM
The Truth
I agree.
as for the bike helmets...i UNDERSTAND the use, and the fear for the childrens lives...but theres only so much padding you can put on until your not cycling anymore, your just rolling. I personnaly do not use a helmet(unless legally forced to...fuckers) because i feel that i have enough competence to not get myself killed, and if i do, it was my time.
punqsux
11-18-2004, 02:21 PM
as for the bike helmets...i UNDERSTAND the use, and the fear for the childrens lives...but theres only so much padding you can put on until your not cycling anymore, your just rolling. I personnaly do not use a helmet(unless legally forced to...shaq-fuers) because i feel that i have enough competence to not get myself killed, and if i do, it was my time.
when riding a bike, its not about the competene of getting yourself killed, thats just being cocky. you have to be trusting enough that every person in every car isnt going to kill you.
people dont often pay attention to bikers if they are in a hurry, i cant even count the number of times ive come a half second from being slammed by a car, or had to swerve into oncomming traffic to avoid being hit.
yeah my brakes dont work either.
GuilewasNK
11-18-2004, 02:21 PM
The funny thing is that for all the people who complain about this being shown while kids are watching, none have complained when they show the cheerleaders bouncing up and down with next to nothing on.
opportunity777
11-18-2004, 02:25 PM
Because people are a bunch of fake lameasses :)
The Shiznit
11-18-2004, 02:26 PM
sex is everywhere you look: billboards, commercials, radio, the news, etc... It's all about how you raise your kids if they grow up to do the right thing.
daikaiju
11-18-2004, 02:29 PM
Everytime I see a kid on a bike wearing a helmet I cry a bit inside. THe possibility of falling off your bike and cracking your skull open is part of growing up but now all the kids wear these helmets that are 4 times the size of their head and their bodies are completly covered in bubble wrap.
I'm with you...whatever happened to natural selection?
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 02:34 PM
Everytime I see a kid on a bike wearing a helmet I cry a bit inside. THe possibility of falling off your bike and cracking your skull open is part of growing up but now all the kids wear these helmets that are 4 times the size of their head and their bodies are completly covered in bubble wrap.
I'm with you...whatever happened to natural selection?
Lawyers, if little jimmie fell of his bike and cracked his head a thousand lawyers would popup to sue the bike maker and whoever owned the property he hurt himself on.
GuilewasNK
11-18-2004, 02:35 PM
I was more offended by the fact that in the last Ravens game Ray Lewis pants kept falling off his ass. Why no anger at the sight of Ray Lewis' ass crack? I guess the FCC has no problem with big ugly man-ass.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 02:43 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's fucking everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big fucking deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
Wshakspear
11-18-2004, 02:43 PM
as for the bike helmets...i UNDERSTAND the use, and the fear for the childrens lives...but theres only so much padding you can put on until your not cycling anymore, your just rolling. I personnaly do not use a helmet(unless legally forced to...shaq-fuers) because i feel that i have enough competence to not get myself killed, and if i do, it was my time.
when riding a bike, its not about the competene of getting yourself killed, thats just being cocky. you have to be trusting enough that every person in every car isnt going to kill you.
people dont often pay attention to bikers if they are in a hurry, i cant even count the number of times ive come a half second from being slammed by a car, or had to swerve into oncomming traffic to avoid being hit.
yeah my brakes dont work either.
Ok, then your in denial that when its Helmet Vs. Car, helmet wins. If your getting hit by a fucking car, you deserve it (well...that was harsh...).
EDIT BEFORE EVEN POSTING: I dont mean YOU you, i mean people who arnt careful enough to watch out for cars...yeah, those people
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 02:46 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
Fem-Nazi! :D
zewone
11-18-2004, 02:47 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
Thank god what you said is true. :)
punqsux
11-18-2004, 02:48 PM
Ok, then your in denial that when its Helmet Vs. Car, helmet wins. If your getting hit by a shaq-fuing car, you deserve it (well...that was harsh...).
EDIT BEFORE EVEN POSTING: I dont mean YOU you, i mean people who arnt careful enough to watch out for cars...yeah, those people
i agree you have to be alert at all times of what car are or may be doing...no one in pgh uses turn signals.
i never said a helmet would save your life everytime, but if you land on your head, it increases your odds quite a bit. other pads do nothing but protect you from cuts from falling and stuff like that, but helmets actully to provide protection.
punqsux
11-18-2004, 02:50 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
when are you doing that naked guy sig?
Javery
11-18-2004, 02:50 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
I have no problem with any nudity whatsoever but the reason women are figured more prominently than men as far as sex goes is simple: It all comes down to the balls. I mean just take a look at them... there's the flapping skin, the hair, the sweaty testicle broth, etc. Who wants to see that?
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 02:51 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
Fem-Nazi! :D
Aahahaha, yes that's right, bring the hatred my way ;)
I'm barely ever on anymore so I don't really care. Just expressing myself :P
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 02:53 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
I have no problem with any nudity whatsoever but the reason women are figured more prominently than men as far as sex goes is simple: It all comes down to the balls. I mean just take a look at them... there's the flapping skin, the hair, the sweaty testicle broth, etc. Who wants to see that?
Well that's good and... o_O; I've never taken an intimately close look into them... but... I guess I see what you mean.
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 02:54 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
Fem-Nazi! :D
Aahahaha, yes that's right, bring the hatred my way ;)
I'm barely ever on anymore so I don't really care. Just expressing myself :P
Yeah I've noticed you seem to randomly popup post a few things and then dissapear, so I hope you've found other things to do.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 02:56 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
Fem-Nazi! :D
Aahahaha, yes that's right, bring the hatred my way ;)
I'm barely ever on anymore so I don't really care. Just expressing myself :P
Yeah I've noticed you seem to randomly popup post a few things and then dissapear, so I hope you've found other things to do.
Nope not really, well yeah kind of. I've been out a lot more often and away, at other people's houses or trying to make plans to get away from my fucking dad, or just on the phone every night. I still check in every once in a while though... but I feel that my activeness on this site may soon materialize into nothing.
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 02:59 PM
Nope not really, well yeah kind of. I've been out a lot more often and away, at other people's houses or trying to make plans to get away from my shaq-fuing dad, or just on the phone every night. I still check in every once in a while though... but I feel that my activeness on this site may soon materialize into nothing.
Well its good to hear that you've found other things and to bad your father's such a dick but of course he's only doing what's "best" for you right? :lol:
dcfox
11-18-2004, 03:09 PM
It's contradictial if you only want to promote sex for one kind of thing, and by doing that you have to take the "good" with the "bad". I've seen way too many guys become repulsed at the thought of another guy naked, but they don't complain about the opposite sex. Women are forced to endure it whether they like it or not, since it's shaq-fuing everywhere. We are all humans so I don't see the big shaq-fuing deal at seeing another human being naked whether they are MALE or FEMALE for either sex. Fortunately for guys though, males don't like to be displayed as nude nearly as much as women since it's "bad", so even so they have to endure barely any if any at all.
I have no problem with any nudity whatsoever but the reason women are figured more prominently than men as far as sex goes is simple: It all comes down to the balls. I mean just take a look at them... there's the flapping skin, the hair, the sweaty testicle broth, etc. Who wants to see that?
Maybe your testicles are like that, but I groom my balls into a work of art.
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 03:10 PM
Maybe your testicles are like that, but I groom my balls into a work of art.
I think I'll quote that for a week! :D
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 03:11 PM
:rofl:
FriskyTanuki
11-18-2004, 03:12 PM
Nope not really, well yeah kind of. I've been out a lot more often and away, at other people's houses or trying to make plans to get away from my shaq-fuing dad, or just on the phone every night. I still check in every once in a while though... but I feel that my activeness on this site may soon materialize into nothing.
Well its good to hear that you've found other things and to bad your father's such a dick but of course he's only doing what's "best" for you right? :lol:
It's nce to see you haven't abandoned the board totally yet, hopefully the OTTs get back up soon. There's a semi-OTT on the DCR boards if you want some form of an OTT.
FriskyTanuki
11-18-2004, 03:13 PM
Maybe your testicles are like that, but I groom my balls into a work of art.
I think I'll quote that for a week! :D
So that's what 3 times he's been quoted?
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 03:14 PM
Maybe your testicles are like that, but I groom my balls into a work of art.
I think I'll quote that for a week! :D
So that's what 3 times he's been quoted?
I think so, it might be 4.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 03:15 PM
Nope not really, well yeah kind of. I've been out a lot more often and away, at other people's houses or trying to make plans to get away from my shaq-fuing dad, or just on the phone every night. I still check in every once in a while though... but I feel that my activeness on this site may soon materialize into nothing.
Well its good to hear that you've found other things and to bad your father's such a dick but of course he's only doing what's "best" for you right? :lol:
Oh yeah, because trying to "console" me when he knows it pisses me the fuck off (because I don't need it, ever, especially from him) and grounding me for random amounts of time because he decides an 'attitutude problem' is really him just being the wonderful parent that he is. ;)
And crash, not yet, but like I said before, I don't go on DCR... like, ever. I have about 11 posts there.
Javery
11-18-2004, 03:16 PM
Maybe your testicles are like that, but I groom my balls into a work of art.
You could send your balls to a salon 5 times a week and it still wouldn't be enough. There's no such thing as presentable balls. It's a myth.
dcfox
11-18-2004, 03:16 PM
:rofl:
If you leave CAG for good you'll end up missing out on all my wonderful posts. :wink:
FriskyTanuki
11-18-2004, 03:17 PM
Nope not really, well yeah kind of. I've been out a lot more often and away, at other people's houses or trying to make plans to get away from my shaq-fuing dad, or just on the phone every night. I still check in every once in a while though... but I feel that my activeness on this site may soon materialize into nothing.
Well its good to hear that you've found other things and to bad your father's such a dick but of course he's only doing what's "best" for you right? :lol:
Oh yeah, because trying to "console" me when he knows it pisses me the shaq-fu off (because I don't need it, ever, especially from him) and grounding me for random amounts of time because he decides an 'attitutude problem' is really him just being the wonderful parent that he is. ;)
And crash, not yet, but like I said before, I don't go on DCR... like, ever. I have about 11 posts there.
Yeah, there's not that many people there for an active community, which is why I haven't been there for a few days.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 03:17 PM
Ohhhh dcfox he just challenged you and your balls(!)
:hot:
zewone
11-18-2004, 03:18 PM
dcfox- I think he is calling you out on your balls. Prove him wrong. :lol:
dcfox
11-18-2004, 03:20 PM
I swear you guys are just trying to get me to post those naked pics of myself :)
FriskyTanuki
11-18-2004, 03:21 PM
I swear you guys are just trying to get me to post those naked pics of myself :)
You did make a thread about it, but you chickened out.
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 03:21 PM
Oh yeah, because trying to "console" me when he knows it pisses me the shaq-fu off (because I don't need it, ever, especially from him) and grounding me for random amounts of time because he decides an 'attitutude problem' is really him just being the wonderful parent that he is. ;)
Yep that's what parents are for, eventually you'll get old enough and they will give up so long as you dont' do something incredibly stupid.
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 03:22 PM
I swear you guys are just trying to get me to post those naked pics of myself :)
Do it! Do it!
If others can post porn so can you :twisted:
hutno
11-18-2004, 03:22 PM
Oh yeah, because trying to "console" me when he knows it pisses me the shaq-fu off (because I don't need it, ever, especially from him) and grounding me for random amounts of time because he decides an 'attitutude problem' is really him just being the wonderful parent that he is. ;)
Yep that's what parents are for, eventually you'll get old enough and they will give up so long as you dont' do something incredibly stupid.
Unless your parents are DLF's
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 03:25 PM
Oh yeah, because trying to "console" me when he knows it pisses me the shaq-fu off (because I don't need it, ever, especially from him) and grounding me for random amounts of time because he decides an 'attitutude problem' is really him just being the wonderful parent that he is. ;)
Yep that's what parents are for, eventually you'll get old enough and they will give up so long as you dont' do something incredibly stupid.
Unless your parents are DLF's
Ahhh yes, the exception that proves the rule.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 03:29 PM
I don't know, my dad can be a fucking prick sometimes. He definitely doesn't help my reactions or moods though, so I'm partly justified in being mean to him. ;)
And dcfox, just look at manofpeace, he didn't get banned ;)
Just post them and make an apology thread after! It worked for him! XD
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 03:31 PM
I don't know, my dad can be a shaq-fuing prick sometimes. He definitely doesn't help my reactions or moods though, so I'm partly justified in being mean to him. ;)
I know what you mean, my sister and my father have been in a wonderful war of words and attitudes for about 5 years, but she's now off at college and everything is cool. :D
Quackzilla
11-18-2004, 03:38 PM
Check this out:
http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2004_11_15.html#008481
3 people complaining instigated a $1.2 million fine against Fox.
lol, owned!
zionoverfire
11-18-2004, 03:40 PM
Check this out:
http://www.buzzmachine.com/archives/2004_11_15.html#008481
3 people complaining instigated a $1.2 million fine against Fox.
lol, owned!
Interesting so if I write enough letters I can get all the Soap Operas fined out of existence? :twisted:
jlarlee
11-18-2004, 03:56 PM
I don't know, my dad can be a shaq-fuing prick sometimes. He definitely doesn't help my reactions or moods though, so I'm partly justified in being mean to him. ;)
And dcfox, just look at manofpeace, he didn't get banned ;)
Just post them and make an apology thread after! It worked for him! XD
I tell you what when you have kids yourself you forgive your parents for a lot of problems you had with them
x0thedeadzone0x
11-18-2004, 04:17 PM
Maybe I will, but who knows. I've got more of a problem with my mom then my dad, actually. Oh yeah and yesterday was fun-filled for me...
Bivensra
11-18-2004, 04:35 PM
I think the biggest load of crap in that is "Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy found it racially offensive."
Give me a break.
But yea, it is getting pretty ridiculous.
That's why I just don't bother to watch tv anymore.
Why did Dungy have to complain about race. Would Dungy have cared if Nicole jumped in Manning's arms? So does that mean if it had been a hot black girl like Tyra everythings ok.
People need to stop complaining about the little things and worry about the big issues.
You have to really read into what Dungy was saying. Walk with me... Deperate Housewives airs at 9pm. The game airs at 9 pm. The content of the show is a lot more risque than what happened prior to the game. A lot of people out there dislike Owens for his on the field displays. Nicollette Sheirdan is a attractive Caucasian woman and TO is an African American athlete. It begs to question, wld the outcry be so loud if Sheridan jumped on a straddled Tom Brady. I did not even consider the race issue until 24 hours later. Remember, Medgar Evvars was lynched for whistling at a Caucasian woman approx 40 years ago. There are still people out there that have a huge issue with inter racial issues.
On the TO celebrations, why is it so many people have such a problem with his celebrations and had problems w/ Deion Sanders, yet you do not hear complaints about Willie Joe Namath???? Not only did he guarantee victory, he stood on the sideline in a mink coat. If TO or Deion did that you wld never hear the end of it. BTW I am a Namath fan and hope that he gets help w/ his alcoholism.
Peace!!!
zewone
11-18-2004, 04:40 PM
Racism it is.
Reality's Fringe
11-18-2004, 04:43 PM
I'm pretty sensitive right now cause I showed this girl my snausage, and she said it was "cute".
The Shiznit
11-18-2004, 04:47 PM
I think the biggest load of crap in that is "Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy found it racially offensive."
Give me a break.
But yea, it is getting pretty ridiculous.
That's why I just don't bother to watch tv anymore.
Why did Dungy have to complain about race. Would Dungy have cared if Nicole jumped in Manning's arms? So does that mean if it had been a hot black girl like Tyra everythings ok.
People need to stop complaining about the little things and worry about the big issues.
You have to really read into what Dungy was saying. Walk with me... Deperate Housewives airs at 9pm. The game airs at 9 pm. The content of the show is a lot more risque than what happened prior to the game. A lot of people out there dislike Owens for his on the field displays. Nicollette Sheirdan is a attractive Caucasian woman and TO is an African American athlete. It begs to question, wld the outcry be so loud if Sheridan jumped on a straddled Tom Brady. I did not even consider the race issue until 24 hours later. Remember, Medgar Evvars was lynched for whistling at a Caucasian woman approx 40 years ago. There are still people out there that have a huge issue with inter racial issues.
On the TO celebrations, why is it so many people have such a problem with his celebrations and had problems w/ Deion Sanders, yet you do not hear complaints about Willie Joe Namath???? Not only did he guarantee victory, he stood on the sideline in a mink coat. If TO or Deion did that you wld never hear the end of it. BTW I am a Namath fan and hope that he gets help w/ his alcoholism.
Peace!!!
so what was racially offensive to Dungy? so it was racially offensive because a white women jumped into a black man's arms? I understand some of your other points but I did not see anything racially offensive on the commercial.
Javery
11-18-2004, 04:47 PM
Joe Namath didn't have to deal with the media of today.
People who immediately see "race issues" every time something happens between two people of different races need to open their f***ing eyes and step into the present. It's 2004 for christ's sake.
The Shiznit
11-18-2004, 04:48 PM
Joe Namath didn't have to deal with the media of today.
People who immediately see "race issues" every time something happens between two people of different races need to open their f***ing eyes and step into the present. It's 2004 for christ's sake.
Exactly!
rajchakrabarti
11-18-2004, 04:51 PM
also with TO... what he said in a espn magazine article two years ago .. i thought was pretty good.
People in the nfl lie, cheat, do drugs, and have murder and rape charges ... and i get in trouble for a sharpie ?
jlarlee
11-18-2004, 05:00 PM
Here is a great article from ESPN that shows how tame this intro is in comparison to earlier MNF intros
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=caple/041118
sblymnlcrymnl
11-18-2004, 05:18 PM
Here is a great article from ESPN that shows how tame this intro is in comparison to earlier MNF intros
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=caple/041118
Of course they're all fake, but it's entertaining nonetheless.
Nirvanaguy777
11-18-2004, 05:25 PM
because they are emo well some of them anyways.....emo sucks
Javery
11-18-2004, 05:33 PM
because they are emo well some of them anyways.....emo sucks
:?:
DigitalSpace
11-18-2004, 10:04 PM
Here is a great article from ESPN that shows how tame this intro is in comparison to earlier MNF intros
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=caple/041118
That one with Roseanne... ugh. :puke:
Bivensra
11-19-2004, 02:20 PM
I think the biggest load of crap in that is "Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy found it racially offensive."
Give me a break.
But yea, it is getting pretty ridiculous.
That's why I just don't bother to watch tv anymore.
Why did Dungy have to complain about race. Would Dungy have cared if Nicole jumped in Manning's arms? So does that mean if it had been a hot black girl like Tyra everythings ok.
People need to stop complaining about the little things and worry about the big issues.
You have to really read into what Dungy was saying. Walk with me... Deperate Housewives airs at 9pm. The game airs at 9 pm. The content of the show is a lot more risque than what happened prior to the game. A lot of people out there dislike Owens for his on the field displays.
Nicollette Sheirdan is a attractive Caucasian woman and TO is an African American athlete. It begs to question, wld the outcry be so loud if Sheridan jumped on a straddled Tom Brady. I did not even consider the race issue until 24 hours later. Remember, Medgar Evvars was lynched for whistling at a Caucasian woman approx 40 years ago. There are still people out there that have a huge issue with inter racial issues.
On the TO celebrations, why is it so many people have such a problem with his celebrations and had problems w/ Deion Sanders, yet you do not hear complaints about Willie Joe Namath???? Not only did he guarantee victory, he stood on the sideline in a mink coat. If TO or Deion did that you wld never hear the end of it. BTW I am a Namath fan and hope that he gets help w/ his alcoholism.
Peace!!!
so what was racially offensive to Dungy? so it was racially offensive because a white women jumped into a black man's arms? I understand some of your other points but I did not see anything racially offensive on the commercial.
Sorry, I did not mention that I am not sure where Dungy was going w/ his comment. He mentioned Kobe which was odd b/c that was an alleged rape so no comparison. I think he wanted to touch on race b/ as long winded as his response was, he sidestepped like Eggerin James on a long run.
Bivensra
11-19-2004, 02:25 PM
Joe Namath didn't have to deal with the media of today.
People who immediately see "race issues" every time something happens between two people of different races need to open their f***ing eyes and step into the present. It's 2004 for christ's sake.
Exactly!
That is true BUT... If you recall in 2003 and 2004 Rubben Studdard and Fantasia from American Idol received death threats based on their race. FOX, The View and Access Hollywood all confirmed this. I am from Cincinnati and played football w/ Ken Griffey JR. He gets regular death threats and many of them comments are laced w/ racial eppithets. Yes things have gotten a lot better b/ race still matters.
Larsin
11-19-2004, 02:25 PM
fuck censorship! <---- will probably get censored... haha
x0thedeadzone0x
11-19-2004, 02:29 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
sblymnlcrymnl
11-19-2004, 02:38 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
Because some of us *stares at dz* are underage. :lol:
Othergods
11-19-2004, 02:41 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
Now you have gone and done it, Now I have to call the FCC. Sorry about the Fine Cheapy I will let you take it out on me in Halo 2.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-19-2004, 02:49 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
Because some of us *stares at dz* are underage. :lol:
:rofl:
Damn, you caught me...
but... but... I'm 18... >_> <_<
Hey, it's possible. I've had someone tell me I looked 18 when I was 12 before. (Then again they might've been on crack, but still.).
Indiana
11-19-2004, 02:54 PM
Since when does the FCC control what is said on the Internet? It's called freedom of speech. Maybe someone needs to read the ammendments to the constitution.
Othergods
11-19-2004, 02:54 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
Because some of us *stares at dz* are underage. :lol:
:rofl:
Damn, you caught me...
but... but... I'm 18... >_> <_<
Hey, it's possible. I've had someone tell me I looked 18 when I was 12 before. (Then again they might've been on crack, but still.).Judging from your avatar, I would have guessed that you are 18. But then again I am on crack. So take that for what it is worth.
Othergods
11-19-2004, 02:57 PM
Since when does the FCC control what is said on the Internet? It's called freedom of speech. Maybe someone needs to read the ammendments to the constitution.Well since the internet is the equivilent to TV while you are at work, that gives the FCC Jurisdiction :P
x0thedeadzone0x
11-19-2004, 02:59 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
Because some of us *stares at dz* are underage. :lol:
:rofl:
Damn, you caught me...
but... but... I'm 18... >_> <_<
Hey, it's possible. I've had someone tell me I looked 18 when I was 12 before. (Then again they might've been on crack, but still.).Judging from your avatar, I would have guessed that you are 18. But then again I am on crack. So take that for what it is worth.
:rofl:
GuilewasNK
11-19-2004, 03:27 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
Probably so some affiliates wouldn't get all pissy like Best Buy did about the word ass being in Cheapassgamer, or maybe some people were just over using it. If people complained here about people making useless polls then it would be reasonable to assume that a barrage of fucks on a daily basis could get the same response. I'm just guessing though.
To be honest I like the censored version because the meaning is still implied yet it won't offend people. It's a reasonable compromise. On the rare occasion I do want to drop an f-bomb in real life I say shaq-fu instead. It's great cause I can say it around someone and they are like WTF? :lol:
x0thedeadzone0x
11-19-2004, 03:29 PM
Definitely. I'd say it's a CAG inside joke, or something... because I slipped and said it in front of my friends before, who were like... Whaaa? And I was just surprised that it slip and said "Nothing..." :lol:
GuilewasNK
11-19-2004, 03:31 PM
Definitely. I'd say it's a CAG inside joke, or something... because I slipped and said it in front of my friends before, who were like... Whaaa? And I was just surprised that it slip and said "Nothing..." :lol:
:P
It's gonna slowly sweep the nation, you wait and see!
Sartori
11-19-2004, 04:33 PM
To be honest I like the censored version because the meaning is still implied yet it won't offend people. It's a reasonable compromise.
I'm not a big fan. I think it's a ridiculous notion. Just like the censorship I see on my tv and hear on my radio (er, that's assuming I were to turn either of them on).
camoor
11-19-2004, 04:43 PM
Can we just do the responsible thing and burn all of the books, censor all of the tv shows, and destroy all of the video games that could posible scare a child if they saw it? Or at least make the following modifications:
diddly-dang-darn-it instead of shit.
instead of blood, when people are hurt a pretty rainbow pours out.
when a couple are in love, they go to bed fully and tastefully clothed, and hold hands (none of that kissy stuff!)
GuilewasNK
11-19-2004, 04:48 PM
I'm talking about here not radio or TV. The board here is quite relaxed compared to most I've seen. You can talk about almost anything here and really the only curse word that has been altered is the f-word and racial slurs. To be honest there are few times where cursing has gotten out of hand here and I think that is due to the fact that the rules aren't overly restrictive.
It simply cannot be all restrictive or all free because that would be fair to no one. Some compromise is necessary, especially in a large community.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-19-2004, 05:11 PM
That's all very well though, but it's completely hypocritical. We can't say fuck, but people make porn threads, or something similar. Seems a little unbalanced to me.
GuilewasNK
11-19-2004, 05:31 PM
But they can't post a pic of someone eh, fucking someone. There is balance in that regard. I don't think most people would want to see a giant wang when they open a page here.
camoor
11-19-2004, 05:37 PM
That's all very well though, but it's completely hypocritical. We can't say shaq-fu, but people make porn threads, or something similar. Seems a little unbalanced to me.
I like an imbalance in my favor. Censorship sucks in any form, but I don't decry the freedoms that I'm granted.
This site rules in terms of freedom of speech. The rest of the net should follow it's example.
Javery
11-19-2004, 05:42 PM
This site rules in terms of freedom of speech. The rest of the net should follow it's example.
Yes it does and it is much appreciated...
zionoverfire
11-19-2004, 05:43 PM
That's all very well though, but it's completely hypocritical. We can't say shaq-fu, but people make porn threads, or something similar. Seems a little unbalanced to me.
Well honesty its not that bad since we can say anyother word! just not F U
GuilewasNK
11-19-2004, 05:49 PM
Also, we have all censored someone else in our lifetimes so that is a bit hypocritical in itself. Anyone who has told someone else to shut up is guilty of this. We have all told told someone to shut up for saying less than the f-word despite the fact they have the right to speak.
Imbalance in one's favor is always nice but I also try to remember when it isn't in my favor.
God I sound like Spock...:lol:
x0thedeadzone0x
11-19-2004, 07:28 PM
Well yeah but still I think the content or content of people's posts is a lot worse then the actual word fuck itself sometimes. So if anybodys gonna rant about censoring for the kids or whatever, then swearing isn't/shouldn't really be the problem, that's all I was trying to say.
sblymnlcrymnl
11-19-2004, 07:31 PM
Well yeah but still I think the content or content of people's posts is a lot worse then the actual word shaq-fu itself sometimes. So if anybodys gonna rant about censoring for the kids or whatever, then swearing isn't/shouldn't really be the problem, that's all I was trying to say.
You only need to see my dc sig to confirm that. :lol:
GuilewasNK
11-19-2004, 07:35 PM
Well yeah but still I think the content or content of people's posts is a lot worse then the actual word shaq-fu itself sometimes. So if anybodys gonna rant about censoring for the kids or whatever, then swearing isn't/shouldn't really be the problem, that's all I was trying to say.
I think you make a valid point there.
Moxio
11-19-2004, 08:46 PM
That's all very well though, but it's completely hypocritical. We can't say shaq-fu, but people make porn threads, or something similar. Seems a little unbalanced to me.
I must admit, the pornography threads were definitely out of line, especially considering we have so many younger members here; off the top of my head, xboxmaster, DZ, etc.
Since the word "fu**" is pretty much only used in R movies, we could implie you need to be adult- or near adult-aged to use the word. Since porn is also on the adult side, it should also be banned to be talked on this board. Joking about it softly is alright, but taking it too far as to joking about beastiality and "necrophilia" *looks at dcfox* is just bizarre.
Word.
zionoverfire
11-19-2004, 08:50 PM
That's all very well though, but it's completely hypocritical. We can't say shaq-fu, but people make porn threads, or something similar. Seems a little unbalanced to me.
I must admit, the pornography threads were definitely out of line, especially considering we have so many younger members here; off the top of my head, xboxmaster, DZ, etc.
Since the word "fu**" is pretty much only used in R movies, we could implie you need to be adult- or near adult-aged to use the word. Since porn is also on the adult side, it should also be banned to be talked on this board. Joking about it softly is alright, but taking it too far as to joking about beastiality and "necrophilia" *looks at dcfox* is just bizarre.
Word.
:roll:
Once again DZ makes a good point and Moxio takes it to far.
Moxio
11-19-2004, 09:00 PM
That's all very well though, but it's completely hypocritical. We can't say shaq-fu, but people make porn threads, or something similar. Seems a little unbalanced to me.
I must admit, the pornography threads were definitely out of line, especially considering we have so many younger members here; off the top of my head, xboxmaster, DZ, etc.
Since the word "fu**" is pretty much only used in R movies, we could implie you need to be adult- or near adult-aged to use the word. Since porn is also on the adult side, it should also be banned to be talked on this board. Joking about it softly is alright, but taking it too far as to joking about beastiality and "necrophilia" *looks at dcfox* is just bizarre.
Word.
:roll:
Once again DZ makes a good point and Moxio takes it to far.
It's what I do.
Nirvanaguy777
11-19-2004, 10:35 PM
Speaking of which, why did he change it to shaq-fu in the first place? why can't i just say ブck freely?
:(
Because some of us *stares at dz* are underage. :lol:
:rofl:
Damn, you caught me...
but... but... I'm 18... >_> <_<
Hey, it's possible. I've had someone tell me I looked 18 when I was 12 before. (Then again they might've been on crack, but still.).
wait you mean your not 12, im so confused
x0thedeadzone0x
11-20-2004, 07:47 AM
I'm 15... o_O
And here's something else I don't get... they say that the OTTs are bad for the server, right? Then why is everyone else allowed to create useless threads and they don't get locked immediately too? It's so goddamn fucking stupid...
moiety
11-20-2004, 09:09 AM
Because most other threads don't exceed 500 posts in a short period of time. Some of the older ones exceeded 2000 posts. Stop whining. You'll probably have your chat-threads back after Christmas. Until then, just respect Cheapy's decision and wait.
x0thedeadzone0x
11-20-2004, 09:23 AM
Not really, I see a crapload of threads go over 500 in a short period of time in this forum, and I'm pretty sure only one topic has EVER gone over 2k, which was the original, so don't blow things out of proportion.
Nirvanaguy777
11-20-2004, 09:27 AM
Dammit its 9:25, I dont think I have ever woken up so early on a saturday, I think ill actually have breakfast today hope the mess hall doesnt have shit like they usually do.
I'm 15... o_O
And here's something else I don't get... they say that the OTTs are bad for the server, right? Then why is everyone else allowed to create useless threads and they don't get locked immediately too? It's so goddamn shaq-fuing stupid...
OMG CONSPEARASY!!
moiety
11-20-2004, 09:40 AM
Not really, I see a crapload of threads go over 500 in a short period of time in this forum
Non-OTT's or "one-word" threads?
:roll: Whatever you say...
Specter
11-20-2004, 09:44 AM
www.STOPFCC.com
GO THERE^
evilmojo12542
11-20-2004, 09:46 AM
someone explain to me how that was racilal on monday night. I can if a white man and a black women would have done that it would have been ok. That is the way it is nowadyas. "whitechicks" is ok but is you were to do a movie called "blackchicks" there would be more boycots and riots than you could imagine. the only raciism in america is the one we create
x0thedeadzone0x
11-20-2004, 09:46 AM
:roll: I wonder why I even bother.
:roll: I wonder why I even bother.
And in a topic with this title...delicious!
x0thedeadzone0x
11-20-2004, 10:58 AM
There's a difference between sensitivity and stupidity, jackass. All I was saying is that there's random sport topics that go for 20+ pages and retarded ass threads in here that are allowed to continue for however long, yet if anyone is taken slightly off-topic in another thread, all hell breaks loose and everyone gets so fucking uptight. Why is everyone so effing over-sensitive is right. And I'm done with this topic, because this whole site shouldn't even be bothered with or else chaos ensues. That's why I never go on anymore.
sblymnlcrymnl
11-20-2004, 02:04 PM
Yes let's take the biggest threads that have created the best sense of community here on CAG and ban them because they're too fucking popular.
I know OTTs put alot of strain on the server, but that's the price you pay to have a board that people actually want to visit.
Othergods
11-20-2004, 02:22 PM
Can we just do the responsible thing and burn all of the books, censor all of the tv shows, and destroy all of the video games that could posible scare a child if they saw it? Or at least make the following modifications:
diddly-dang-darn-it instead of shit.
instead of blood, when people are hurt a pretty rainbow pours out.
when a couple are in love, they go to bed fully and tastefully clothed, and hold hands (none of that kissy stuff!)Wouldn't this just breed a society of serial killers?
The off-topic forum is just a consolation so the rest of the legitimate boards don't get all crapped up by stupid threads. I enjoy some of the threads here, but this isn't primarily a social site and to keep the useful parts of it running smoothly sacrifices to the worthless parts have to be made. I suggest not defining your life by personal postcount or popularity of threads created. You can stockpile blubbering then for more serious grievances then.
Can we just do the responsible thing and burn all of the books, censor all of the tv shows, and destroy all of the video games that could posible scare a child if they saw it? Or at least make the following modifications:
diddly-dang-darn-it instead of shit.
instead of blood, when people are hurt a pretty rainbow pours out.
when a couple are in love, they go to bed fully and tastefully clothed, and hold hands (none of that kissy stuff!)Wouldn't this just breed a society of serial killers?
Have the Mormons ever produced a serial killer?
Othergods
11-20-2004, 02:34 PM
Can we just do the responsible thing and burn all of the books, censor all of the tv shows, and destroy all of the video games that could posible scare a child if they saw it? Or at least make the following modifications:
diddly-dang-darn-it instead of shit.
instead of blood, when people are hurt a pretty rainbow pours out.
when a couple are in love, they go to bed fully and tastefully clothed, and hold hands (none of that kissy stuff!)Wouldn't this just breed a society of serial killers?
Have the Mormons ever produced a serial killer?
Yes, Yes they have for I am a Mormon serial Killer....
But seriously you can not consider the Mormons to be very balanced mentally. Have you seen the Mormon episode of South Park? Beside read the following paragraph and that will prove their unbalance.
Joseph Smith, the founder of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, first secretly promoted the concept of polygyny during the 1830s. This type of marital structure involves one man married to multiple wives. The practice has been variously called the Law of Abraham, the Patriarchal Order of Marriage, Celestial Plural Marriage, or the Law of the Priesthood.
Can we just do the responsible thing and burn all of the books, censor all of the tv shows, and destroy all of the video games that could posible scare a child if they saw it? Or at least make the following modifications:
diddly-dang-darn-it instead of shit.
instead of blood, when people are hurt a pretty rainbow pours out.
when a couple are in love, they go to bed fully and tastefully clothed, and hold hands (none of that kissy stuff!)Wouldn't this just breed a society of serial killers?
Have the Mormons ever produced a serial killer?
Yes, Yes they have for I am a Mormon serial Killer....
But seriously you can not consider the Mormons to be very balanced mentally. Have you seen the Mormon episode of South Park? Beside read the following paragraph and that will prove their unbalance.
Joseph Smith, the founder of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, first secretly promoted the concept of polygyny during the 1830s. This type of marital structure involves one man married to multiple wives. The practice has been variously called the Law of Abraham, the Patriarchal Order of Marriage, Celestial Plural Marriage, or the Law of the Priesthood.
A guy...who wants to have sex with multiple ladies?! That monster!
As for the South Park episode, did you watch it all the way to the end? The whole point was that Mormons are pretty decent people, despite their odd religious beliefs and that Stan was a dick for not wanting to be the kid's friend just because of it.
Othergods
11-20-2004, 02:47 PM
Yes I am referring to how the religion was created. Again this is all total sarcasm :D
Also, Yes every man wants to have sex with more than one woman, but who wants to be married to more than one????
Zenithian Legend
11-20-2004, 05:23 PM
Did someone say something about OTTers?
Did someone say something about OTTers?
The Otter. Man's most fiendish enemy...
http://www.sch.im/wlp/large%20images/short%20clawed%20otter.jpg
Zenithian Legend
11-21-2004, 02:01 PM
Ya know, I think the otter was one of the only animals omitted from Animal Crossing.