View Full Version : USA to produce Plutonium 238 in Idaho
captaincold
06-28-2005, 03:58 PM
Just read this on the cover of the Seattle Pi.
Apparently for "National Security" purposes.
"Plutonium 238 is said to be "100's" of times more radioactive than Plutonium 239 which is used in nuclear weapons"
Mookyjooky
06-28-2005, 04:03 PM
Awesome. USA rocks. Thank God for modern Science.
Quackzilla
06-28-2005, 04:26 PM
Major Radiation: Alpha - 5.49 MeV
Alpha particals cannoth penetrate paper, much less skin. They will, however, damage organ tissue if ingested or inhaled.
Because Plutonium 238 is a very high alpha emitter, inhalation or iingestion is deadly.
External exposure is not dangerous, but it still must be handled with care, and properly contained. It is used for nuclear power, and any benefits greatly outweight the virtually nonexistant risks.
Mookyjooky
06-28-2005, 04:28 PM
Pretty much, nuclear energy is not only the best energy resource on the planet...but one of the safest. I welcome nuclear power with open arms.
Without it, we wouldnt have enough energy to power half of america.
Quillion
06-28-2005, 05:59 PM
Muahahaha!
I will steal it and hold the world hostage.
"Pay me one hundred billion dollars or I will secretly make America eat Plutonium."
Muahahaha!
captaincold
06-28-2005, 07:45 PM
Pretty much, nuclear energy is not only the best energy resource on the planet...but one of the safest. I welcome nuclear power with open arms.
Without it, we wouldnt have enough energy to power half of america.
Ok replace USA with another country, like say Canada/Japan/France etc...
How would you feel then?
It's foolish to consider manufaturing this considering the state of the world right now.
Quackzilla
06-28-2005, 07:47 PM
Canada wouldn't be safe, but nuclear manufacturing plants in France and Japan are tighter than virgin assholes when it comes to security.
Mookyjooky
06-29-2005, 12:01 PM
Ok replace USA with another country, like say Canada/Japan/France etc...
How would you feel then?
It's foolish to consider manufaturing this considering the state of the world right now.
Ok, but why stop there? Why not we just have a chernobyl reunion? Get all the old guys together and have them manufacture and store the stuff in a run down winn-dixie. In fact, the only protection they would have from the radiation is stacked boxes of old lucky charms.
Nuclear meltdown? Clean up on isle 5!
Or, we could not make hypothetical questions...and stick with the facts. Is it in the US? yes. Then lets stick with that.
Idaho? Mutant potato infantry, huh, government? That's the dumbest idea I've ever heard!
David85
06-29-2005, 01:46 PM
We need it to power things. We normally get it from Russia, but our deal with them doesn't let us use if for "military resources", so we need to make our own because we ran out. I see no issue with this.
captaincold
06-29-2005, 01:53 PM
Ok, but why stop there? Why not we just have a chernobyl reunion? Get all the old guys together and have them manufacture and store the stuff in a run down winn-dixie. In fact, the only protection they would have from the radiation is stacked boxes of old lucky charms.
Nuclear meltdown? Clean up on isle 5!
Or, we could not make hypothetical questions...and stick with the facts. Is it in the US? yes. Then lets stick with that.
How is it a hypothetical question?
You just said that Nuclear Power is a great & safe source for power right?
Well it's safe to say that EVERY country knows that & now that we're considering doing it in these hostile times, what makes you think that they won't do the same? I'm pretty sure they were hesitant to even consider the thought of making these types of materials in war times.
These other countries don't have the same security measures that we have here in the USA & in the post 9/11 world it's utterly foolish to even consider making these types of materials.
Our number 1 concern now is NATIONAL SECURITY, not energy.
David85
06-29-2005, 01:58 PM
And this isn't a national security risk. We have it to begin with, we have used it for 60 years, and the terrorist have never gotten they hands on it.
Plus guess what? Energy is important and these things have been used for 60 years and never an issue. It's commonly used in NASA's deep space probes.
If terrorists want to "nuke" us they will hit a power plant with a plane, that is so easily done.
PittsburghAfterDark
06-29-2005, 02:21 PM
You could fly a plane into a nuke plant's cooling towers and nothing would happen. Three Mile Island is not that far from the Harrisburg airport and the towers there were meant to withstand a direct strike from a widebody jet.
Plutonium 238 has no practical military value for bomb deisgns. Just because something is radioactive doesn't mean it has weapons grade applications. You could make a "dirty" bomb with it but not a fission or fusion weapon. Dirty bombs though have absolutely zero conventional military value.
If anything this stuff is going to be used for missile defence applications fueling weapons (Multi gigawatt lasers on ships or airplanes.) and or space platforms.
Quackzilla
06-29-2005, 03:19 PM
If terrorists want to "nuke" us they will hit a power plant with a plane, that is so easily done.
Triggering a nuclear fission reaction can not be done by flying a plane into a nuclear power plant.
It is a complicated process that involves splitting an atom by adding neutron to it and destabilizing it.
Also, since power plants don't use weapons grade uranium or weapons grade plutonium, unless the terrorists stole it and did and processed it into weapons grade material (not easy, not cheap), there is no way it would blow up anyway.
The worst a terrorist could do is get into the processing plant (impossible), steal the radioacive material (alsoimpossible), strap it to a bomb, and blow it up to spread it around. And even a "dirty bomb" wouldn't do much damage using Plutonium 238 because it would neeeed to be vaporized and inhaled or land in someones food to kill someone.
But to think flying a plane into a nuclear power plant would cause a meltdown is ridiculus.
And to the guy worrying about foreign countries using nuclear power, sercurity guards in European and Russian nuclear power plants are more like soldiers than guards, and they are armed with machinegunes, rifles, and the patrols have submachineguns and pistols.
If you try and get into a French nuclear plant you would be extremely lucky if your family could identify your body.
David85
06-29-2005, 04:30 PM
And the twin towers were meant to withstand a plane crash, that turned out well didn't it?
My point was there are easier ways to try to hurt the USA then taking this which will just power things on military missions.