View Full Version : Another possible Bush Screw Up
ZarathosNY
07-15-2005, 09:34 AM
It seems that the British thought they had the plot to blow of the London subways stopped last year. Then Bush opened his mouth and alerted the terrorists. This post has the info and the related links to CNN, NY Daily News and Wash Times.
Link (http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/07/bush-admin-may-be-responsible-for.html)
evilmax17
07-15-2005, 09:36 AM
Interesting.
and...
KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
Scrubking
07-15-2005, 10:26 AM
Karl Rove is a traitor and should be fired immediately. Spread the word, and help AMERICAblog at the same time, by purchasing some of our Karl Rove gear at the AMERICAblog online store.
Thanks, but that site is too objective and unbiased for me. I only get my news from radical sites with wackos who do nothing but think up conspiracies and ways to demonize Bush.
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Quackzilla
07-15-2005, 10:27 AM
Thank, but that site is too objective and unbiased for me.
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
*hums "stand by your man"*
ZarathosNY
07-15-2005, 10:30 AM
Thanks, but that site is too objective and unbiased for me. I only get my news from radical sites with wackos who do nothing but think up conspiracies and ways to demonize Bush.
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Did you actually read the info? They actually back up their story from news sources, unlike Rush.
Scrubking
07-15-2005, 10:36 AM
Did you actually read the info? They actually back up their story from news sources, unlike Rush.
Anyone can quote news sources, create incredible correlations then use them to support their cause.
It doesn't matter anyway. Whatever Bush does you people try to make it look bad. If he raises the terror alert you call bullshit. If he doesn't then you say he doesn't care about terrorism.
Not to mention Bush isn't to blame for journalists chasing down a terrorist. Don't tell me Bush is to blame for what reporters do now too.
:roll:
ZarathosNY
07-15-2005, 10:43 AM
Anyone can quote news sources, create incredible correlations then use them to support their cause.
It doesn't matter anyway. Whatever Bush does you people try to make it look bad. If he raises the terror alert you call bullshit. If he doesn't then you say he doesn't care about terrorism.
Not to mention Bush isn't to blame for journalists chasing down a terrorist. Don't tell me Bush is to blame for what reporters do now too.
:roll:
No, Bush is responsible for blowing a mole's identity, and causing terrorists to escape. Bush's administration is responsible for blowing a CIA agents cover. If Bush does something well, I will give him credit. If he kept his mouth shut about the mole, it could have resulted in a huge setback for Al-Queda, which would have been a huge feather in his cap. Instead, he bungles it. I don't have to do anything to make Bush look bad, he does it all on his own.
E-Z-B
07-15-2005, 10:57 AM
Face it. Scrubking supports leaders that have betrayed our country and national security. He has no credibility whatsoever.
MrBadExample
07-15-2005, 11:55 AM
To be one of the most secretive White Houses ever, they're not doing such a good job of keeping secrets anymore.
RedvsBlue
07-15-2005, 12:02 PM
Did you actually read the info? They actually back up their story from news sources, unlike Rush.
You mean the Limbaugh Institute for Conservative Studies isn't a reputible news source?
MrBadExample
07-15-2005, 12:04 PM
You mean the Limbaugh Institute for Conservative Studies isn't a reputible news source?
They do have a good drug plan - as long as you like oxycontin. :lol:
Msut77
07-17-2005, 06:40 PM
If he doesn't then you say he doesn't care about terrorism.
Where?