Quantcast Telecoms’ Secret Plan To Attack Net Neutrality: Target Video Gamers And Stoke Fear... - Cheap Ass Gamer
Check out the Price Tracker to see all of today's price drops! Follow CAG USA Video Game Deals on Twitter CAG Facebook CAG RSS Feed
Home

Search Bar

This search bar is a powerful tool for navigating CAG. You can use it to find the lowest prices on games, trade-in values, search members, forum and blog topics, and much more.

After searching for a game title, click the icon to pop-up a window with pricing information.

After typing in what you are looking for, you can filter your results by clicking on one of the tabs that pops up from the top of the search bar.

Tips

Looking for a game on a specific platform? Type in the platform name with the title!
Example: guitar hero 360

You don't need to click a pop-up tab to filter results. Just type what you are looking for right into the search bar.
Example: gears of war prices
Example: ninjatown review

Go Back   Cheap Ass Gamer > Blogs > joeboosauce's Blog > Telecoms’ Secret Plan To Attack Net Neutrality: Target Video Gamers And Stoke Fear...
joeboosauce's Avatar

Telecoms’ Secret Plan To Attack Net Neutrality: Target Video Gamers And Stoke Fear...

By joeboosauce 05-12-2010 12:32 PM
809
views
Here's a very important revelation and news. Net neutrality is something the larger gamer community needs to get unified and behind. We risk a lot by sitting idly on the sidelines. Fee and "premium" access will be another way to milk money from us. As if extra fees like Live and comparable services, EAs new online pass system, monthly game subscriptions, aren't enough. Also, imagine the cluster and network issues when you create a segregated network. Some will have issues mixing with other gamers.

Make no mistake, in all their BS about democracy, these people are really talking about taking more power over consumers. Well, these guys are caught in the act of plotting. So what are WE going to do about it? One way is creating groups, supporting existing ones ie EFF, and steering existing ones, like the ECA, into taking a strong stand against this. Read on...
http://www.savetheinternet.com/

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
http://www.eff.org/


Telecoms’ Secret Plan To Attack Net Neutrality: Target Video Gamers And Stoke Fear Of Chinese Censorship
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/11/...ty-grover-afp/

Net neutrality, a guiding principle for preserving a free and fair Internet, means that Internet service providers are not allowed to discriminate based on content for its customers. However, telecommunications firms — like AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and others — are firmly against net neutrality because they would like to increase their profits by deciding which websites customers can see, and at what speed. The telecom industry has dumped hundreds of millions of dollars into a lobby campaign against net neutrality. As the FCC now takes up net neutrality rule making, the industry is pushing an “outside approach” of hiring front groups and astroturf operatives. This morning, representatives from various front groups launched a new coordinated campaign to kill net neutrality. Speaking on Capitol Hill, these front groups took turns decrying the evils of the principle of a fair and unbiased Internet. LULAC, which is funded by AT&T, called Net Neutrality “Obamacare for the Internet.” Americans for Prosperity — a corporate front group founded by oil billionaire David Koch but also funded by telecom interests — unveiled a new ad smearing net neutrality as a “” (the initial ad buy is $1.4 million dollars). And Grover Norquist, representing his “Americans for Tax Reform” corporate front group, said net neutrality is like what China does, “putting policemen on every corner, on the street or on the Internet.” Watch it:




ThinkProgress has obtained a PowerPoint document which reveals how the telecom industry is orchestrating the latest campaign against Net Neutrality. Authored by representatives from the Atlas Network — a shell think tank used to coordinate corporate front group efforts worldwide — the document lays out the following strategy:
– Slides 7-8 calls for the campaign to target “libertarian minded internet users and video gamers” and “social conservative activists” with anti-government messages and a rebranding of net neutrality as “Net Brutality.”
– Slide 9 calls for a strategy of creating a Chinese blog to compare net neutrality to Chinese government censorship, outreach via social networking platforms like Twitter and Facebook.
– Slides 10-11 detail how representatives met at Grover Norquist’s infamous “Wednesday morning meeting” to orchestrate the new campaign. Norquist is known to use his Wednesday meetings to plot strategy and conservative coalition building towards lobbying goals.
The PowerPoint was created on April 14th, shortly before the campaign website officially launched. The “Net Brutality” website relies heavily on Americans for Prosperity sources, as well as a website called NetCompetition.org — which is openly funded by the American Cable Association, At&T, Comcast, and the US Telecom Association.
During the Jack Abramoff investigation, Norquist was exposed for selling support from his front groups to corporations. In one damning e-mail, Norquist is promised $50,000 dollars in exchange for providing his Americans for Tax Reform support to one of Abramoff’s clients. Today, Norquist was not only parroting the PowerPoint talking points at the press conference, but he also brought in other key conservative movement leaders and Republican lawmakers to the event.
In addition to the front groups, the loudest voice against net neutrality is still Glenn Beck, who has smeared free Internet proponents as Marxists and Communists, and has adopted the attack that net neutrality constitutes a “government takeover.” However, it is important to realize that even Beck is being fed with opposition research dug up by operatives at Americans for Prosperity. This research document, compiled by Americans for Prosperity staffers, lays out point by point the attacks Beck has used in the past few weeks to disparage net neutrality supporters. If Beck picks up this new outreach to video game enthusiasts and the false comparison to Chinese censorship, then the impact of the “Net Brutality” PowerPoint will be even more apparent.
Telecom firms like AT&T and Verizon are among the most profitable in the world, yet America lags behind other countries in terms of broadband access and speed. Instead of dumping lobbying money into anti-net neutrality front groups and fear-mongering campaigns, the telecom industry should invest in improving service and accessibility.

 Comments (Total Comments: 8)  

machtdh's Avatar
They will never give the people a better access if they don't charge a nice fee with it. We, the consumers, are probably going to end up paying, just like we lost the war against car insurance, cell phone, credit cards companies. The biggest problem is that people will go ahead and give away their money, just like they do with things like the Iphone, Ipads, Droids, etc.
EdRyder's Avatar
First , I think its Important to note that while FCC is charging forward with Net Neutrality,Contrary to the above video The White House and most of Washington doesn't like it. They dont want the internet to be overly regulated. At the same time you cant let these gigantic providers run wild. Look how the FCC handled the telecoms when they broke up their monopolies.
The heavy hitters are still around (ma bell and At&T) while the third tier providers like MCI are almost nonexistent.
At the end of the day its all about infrastructure: Who own the means of delivery.
And the internet i forever changing in that respect. You might have dial up, or DSL, cable... In recent years Wireless mobile providers have popped up like Sprint and WiFi hotspots are almost everywhere. What other ways will the internet change over time?
Over regulation now , in its infancy, could put a unnecessary choke hold on a still emerging brand of commerce.All under the guise of attempting to "protect the consumer" Over price gouging? Where is that taking place? Give me some examples of price gouging in the highly competitive ISP market.

Ive never been one to eat from the trough of 'free market' proponents like Beck.But I wont be writing any of my representatives on net neutrality. I also wont be writing them asking how many rolls of toilet paper I can receive this month or ,where my place is in the bread line.
Don Chubo's Avatar
This is a hoax by a group of students.
joeboosauce's Avatar
@Don Chubo
What the Shaq-fu are you talking about? Oh! You work for the above anti-consumer corporate shell group and are following on through on their plan for spreading misinformation? Actually, many corporations and their front groups use forums to gain info and manipulate discussion for their agendas. Details would be a good thing rather than unfounded generalizations.
Don Chubo's Avatar
I misspoke - it's not a hoax, but it is astroturf. Fang's article is pretty misleading.
joeboosauce's Avatar
@EdRyder
You made a mistake to mention telecom carriers. I used to work in that industry. MCI practically does not exist because it was the #1 FIRST TIER provider. Ever hear of MCI Worldcom and Bernie Ebbers? They were a shadow over the rest of the tier 1 providers that I have worked worked for. They are the one of reasons the tech bubble overinflated due to false accounting and reporting and caused in part that whole bubble burst. (People don't know that Enron was also involved in telecom. A lot of things people don't know.)

Regulation is necessary and the internet has not seen overregulation in the US that has stifled growth. This is a free marketeer's imagination. Now, the US telecoms have themselves to blame for our fall in internet access rankings. As monopolies form, these need to be broken up because they control the markets a lot easier.Although, creating oligopolies just stave off the inevitable reemergence of monopolies as you point out to some degree with AT&T.
ISP's haven't really started the price gouging, but without Net Neutrality, they will. When NN is defeated, pray that you ISP likes CAG. because if the video game giants don't like us finding cheap deals, they'll block this site. OH sure, you might still be able to access CAG, at dialup speeds, or for a nice expensive price. Want to search on Google? Sorry, Microsoft just paid your ISP to block it, so enjoy Bing.

The ISP's want the Internet run like Cable. You pay for various cable packages, with more spent for better options (movie channels, sports channels, etc. That's how they want the Internet run. Their theory is, since we all love paying for cable this way (yes, some people like the tier format, because they buy only the basics), we'd all naturally love to pay for the Internet the same way. Of course, that's like me saying since you like apple pie so much, you'll love a lemon pie (not merange, actual sliced up lemons). Or perhaps a nice tomato pie instead of a cherry pie. Cherries and tomatoes are both red fruits. Like one in pie format, you must like the other in pie format as well. See the inheirent illogic?
Halo05's Avatar
Let's cut the shit. How will this interrupt/ruin my access to free porn?

Recent Blog Entries by joeboosauce
Go Back  Cheap Ass Gamer > Blogs > joeboosauce's Blog > Telecoms’ Secret Plan To Attack Net Neutrality: Target Video Gamers And Stoke Fear...

Contact us
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.