Quantcast Thoughts on Game Re-releases - Cheap Ass Gamer
Check out the Price Tracker to see all of today's price drops! Follow CAG USA Video Game Deals on Twitter CAG Facebook CAG RSS Feed
Home

Search Bar

This search bar is a powerful tool for navigating CAG. You can use it to find the lowest prices on games, trade-in values, search members, forum and blog topics, and much more.

After searching for a game title, click the icon to pop-up a window with pricing information.

After typing in what you are looking for, you can filter your results by clicking on one of the tabs that pops up from the top of the search bar.

Tips

Looking for a game on a specific platform? Type in the platform name with the title!
Example: guitar hero 360

You don't need to click a pop-up tab to filter results. Just type what you are looking for right into the search bar.
Example: gears of war prices
Example: ninjatown review

Go Back   Cheap Ass Gamer > Blogs > the_grimace's Blog > Thoughts on Game Re-releases
the_grimace's Avatar

Thoughts on Game Re-releases

By the_grimace 10-15-2012 12:17 PM
386
views
Game re-releases today are rampant, and quickly growing. It seems every time I look, there’s some game re-release coming out, either digital or disc form, it doesn’t matter. Nintendo started the motion with downloadable classics on the Nintendo Wii, and Sony followed suit with digital copies of old games, and even the game collections we see of old series all bundled into one disc. Even Microsoft has gotten into the game.

Then not only do you have re-releases of pre-gen games, but it’s not uncommon to see a game come out, have a few DLC add-ons, and then a few months later the “Special Edition” comes out, with the original game, ALL the DLC, and even sometimes some extra content for a reduced price. With so many re-releases coming out, the general opinion on them is quite mixed. Some angry, and some pleased. Here’s my thoughts.

I’m also somewhat split on the matter. On one hand, if I never had the opportunity to play the game that is getting re-released, a game re-release makes me extremely happy. Most older games go out of print and their prices sky rocket, but oh, here I can buy a digital copy of the game for just $8. Games I never had a chance to play in my life, I am given a second opportunity to enjoy their greatness, sometimes even with a few cool additions or tweaks to make gameplay better. (better controls, new areas or story, upscaled graphics or improved audio quality)

Even the special editions of games make me giddy when I haven’t played them before. You mean I can get Fallout 3 with all 5 DLC for just $40?! That’s a $70 savings, holy shit! It feels good to pick up the special edition of a game so you can achieve everything possible in the game, all while saving a good dollar or two as well.

On the other hand though, what if I already own the game that is being re-released, or faithfully paid full price for all the DLC that has come out for a game? My reaction then turns into the exact opposite, and I AM PISSED.

Here I spent $50 EACH for three games ps2 games, and now I can buy them for $20 on ONE disc for my ps3? Here I spent $60+$50 on borderlands and all it’s 5 DLCs, but you re-release a game of the year edition a year later for $20 with all of that? Classic games that I either owned from the get-go or paid lavish amounts of money to acquire from eBay are now $5 or $10 on the digital game store? It’s frustrating!! In fact, I find myself often preferring to wait for a game re-release to come out, instead of getting the game out of the gates. I mean, if I knew I could save $60+ dollars on a game and all it’s DLC for waiting 9 months, I have enough of a backlog, I don’t really mind.

So here I am, split on the subject of the game re-release, but there is one thing I haven’t mentioned yet that turns the tides, and that is “How do game re-releases benefit the game developer?”

And with this question, it’s hard to be angry at game re-releases simply because in most cases, they are helping the game developers. Here is a product that cost very little to produce, but yet has potential to sell hundreds of thousands of copies, maybe even millions. It’s basically free money, and for a game industry that is not flowing freely with rivers of money, this is a great thing. Therefore, I can’t help but admit game re-releases are actually a very good thing for the game industry and it’s players.

But what about all my feelings of anger and sadness when I already faithfully bought all your games and DLC and now you slap me in the face by offering all of that with new additions and improved graphics for a quarter of the price, maybe even less!? You’re telling me you want another $20 or $40 of my money after I already invested so much into the very same games? Not exactly. I won’t end this blog without addressing that the game re-release needs to appease these long time and loyal fans that have paid full price for the game. I do think that re-releases are good for the industry as a whole, but they can hurt gamers who have been loyal throwing money at you.

So what can be done? A few things honestly. To start, let’s level out prices on the digital and retail stores. I recently bought the Fallout New Vegas ultimate edition for $20. I own the original Fallout New Vegas and one DLC, I paid $70 for that. However, here’s the ultimate edition with the three other DLC’s I need yet, but for $10 less then buying them digitally. It was a no brainer. But that’s not my point. Why is all the DLC in the digital store still full price, when it is being offered almost “complimentary” with the special edition? Reduce prices of add-ons in the stores so that players who already own your game can feel rewarded as well if they don’t want to re-buy a special edition and only pick up some extra add-ons.

Secondly, I think gamers should be rewarded somehow if they own the old versions of you games. Maybe free un-lockable goodies if you enter a code from your old games. I also think game developers should continue to add on to game re-releases, by adding new missions, story elements, and people and places. Fix more bugs, add more features, make the controls better. Incentives like these are often enough fluff to convince both your loyal customers and those that have never played the game to pick it up, and the ones that own the original already won’t feel bad since they are getting lot’s of new content. A good example of this was the persona 3 remake on PSP. I played the PS2 and PSP versions, and the PSP one was great. New story elements, a new character, improved controls and game mechanics, and less frustrating battle system, among several other additions and tweaks. This is how game re-releases ought to be.

So I encourage game developers to keep re-releasing old games, but do keep in your mind your loyal fans and customers. You got to cater to them too, making buying another copy of the same game a fresh and exciting experience, and just not offer something like “HD graphics!!!”. While I myself am upset at times about game re-releases that I paid full price for, I can’t help but say that game re-releases are a good thing, and it excites me that so many gamers get to have the opportunity to play older classics that they might have never had a chance to experience at all.

So that’s it for this blog. Let me know your thoughts and comments, thank you for reading!

 Comments (Total Comments: 5)  

joeboosauce's Avatar
You lost me at "faithfully paid full price..." I'm of the opinion that the only things to be faithful to are things like friends and family which none of these companies are. They aren't loyal to us in any sense of the word. In the end, let the market decide price, not loyalty. Brand "loyalty" has people lapping up the umpteenth iteration of COD for $60. To your question about feeling jilted on buying the game at full price, don't do it. Wait, because you KNOW that it will drop and get packaged with extras. But, if you want it on release day before the rest of us, be happy with that. You are ultimately paying for early access.

Here's an idea. How about people don't buy the games early. It seems to be a growing trend. Then the publishers incentivize early adoption with something real such as sell ALL the DLC for the game (we know they have most of that stuff ready before launch...) with a time-sensitive DLC code. So, buy in the first month and you get it all. That is a way to create a semblance of "loyalty." Hmmm... maybe I need to sell this idea to them...
antlp89's Avatar
I fully welcome the "GOTY" editions of late.

You only have to wait a year or two at most, and a GOTY edition will pop up with all the extra content included. With my current backlog, waiting an extra year is no problem at all. I rarely purchase digital content since it rarely goes on sale so having a physical disk (which can only depreciate in price over time) with all the content is fantastic.

I also love the HD re-releases. It allows me to play some of my favorite games on my HDTV without cringing and also gives the developers some extra support for future sequels of the series I'm interested in. It's a win-win.

For a CAG in this generation, initial price point doesn't really matter since most game prices plummet within a couple months after release.
the_grimace's Avatar
@joeboosauce

faithfully was the wrong word there. I was more so just trying to emphasize the fact of paying full price for anything. If I like something, I'm going to buy it and support it. I was merely stating it's upsetting when down the road, my purchase feels undermined when it comes out for a lower price and with free goodies.

Use this example, imagine you are looking for a new car. You really like Toyotas, so you go out and buy your favorite model for $25,000. You like the brand, the car is good, and everything is fine. But 6 months later, Toyota announces they are remaking the model of car you bought, giving it 5 awesome upgrades, and for only $15000. I think you would be upset at this. I know I would. That's the point I was ultimately trying to get across.

@antlp89

Like I said, I too love these, and these types of re-releases have allowed me to play some awesome games of the past I may have never experience otherwise. However, I still can't help but feel bitter for being an early adopter and missing out the great value of a re-release, especially if game play improvements have been made to make the game more enjoyable.
PenguinMaster's Avatar
Your stance makes no sense. With the vast majority of games they will drop in price significantly whether they have a re-release or not. It doesn't make any sense to be pissed that a game is cheaper later.
the_grimace's Avatar
@penguinMaster

I think my stance is being misinterpreted here. I understand that most games will lose value over time (a small percentage will gain value once they go out of print) but It's more so the fact that the game gets "upgraded" with new content or better mechanics, or gets bundled with DLC that rarely is on sale. Occasionally there is the rare DLC sale, but most of the time, if you go to purchase DLC, buying one add-on can be more than the game itself. I know I've bought games for $10, and their DLC is still $15 in the digital stores. It's when the disk based game of the year comes out for $20 with 3 DLCs that retail for $15 each that I get irritated. This is why I suggest that DLC prices should reduce accordingly when bundled special editions or game of the year re-releases come out.

Recent Blog Entries by the_grimace
Go Back  Cheap Ass Gamer > Blogs > the_grimace's Blog > Thoughts on Game Re-releases

Contact us
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.