|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAGLeagueSports
And if anyone was caught doing so, we would all have the same opinion that we do now, and it wouldn't be allowed. Come on, dude. At least have the decency to acknowledge that you're trying to exploit a loophole. Teams are supposed to have 53 players. That should be common sense. If people want to function outside of the realm of common sense, it gets a little difficult to pre-emptively disallow things. If your main gripe is really that it's not in the OP, I'll add it the next chance I get. It's a reasonable expectation...and one that we all should follow.
|
|
Not trying to exploit any loophole at all. If you dont want teams having less than 53 players thats fine and I totally respect that, but it has never been said before so again I really didn't see any issue with having 49 or 50 players if it would keep me under the cap, especially asking the commish beforehand. The only expectation I've seen was to have at least the minimum number of players at each position as listed in the roster breakdowns in-game. But again I completely respect the decision and will be happy to keep Martin and VJax on my team.