Originally Posted by PottyPops Do I really need to point out that it is you attacking my beliefs and as such I made a rebuttal? This all started because I agreed that the universe was older than 6,000 yrs despite the general consensus of my peers. Then it was like... "THERE HE IS!!!! GET THE CHRISTIAN!!!!" And so it began. I got accused of saying one thing or another, so I showed I never said nor meant any of those accusations held against me.

And cue the persecution complex. You all want to be the next Jesus so hard.

Not even 5 minutes into that Stewart O'Reilly debate, O'Reilly said it and started doing his own thing.

Originally Posted by PottyPops Name me one, just one single example of how what I've said in this forum is ignoring parts of my religion. I do choose to ignore man's speculation but I've given no example of me dismissing parts of my religion. You are taking something I said on a single subject and applying it to all of Christianity. Nowhere do I even hint that the ancient language is the cause of all confusion. I said the use of the language is why man's theory of a 6k yr old universe is wrong. What I said about confusion is God wants his followers to find Him on their own, not because others say to.

This discussion was a mistake. This board is not quick enough for it, and at the rate we're going it will never end. Besides, you probably assumed my tone was aggressive and hostile, when I'm genuinely curious. Anyway, I won't bother arguing about it anymore, so take care.

This argument about Christianity is Classy.

Originally Posted by camoor And cue the persecution complex. You all want to be the next Jesus so hard.

You're right. I went too far. That was foolish of me to say.

ever find it hilarious that AM radio hosts will shamelessly call the portion of the country that "doesn't pay income taxes" a bunch of skells but will then turn around and do a VO ad for a company that helps get people out of IRS debt?

Christ they even troll themselves!

Originally Posted by The Crotch He who s nuns will later join the church?

I was actually listening to this when I came to your post, thanks for making my day.

Oh you've got to love republicans. A fetus is sacred and anyone who aborts is a murderer, but after that little SOB is born, that's another story....

http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog...lious-children

Let me sum it up like this, imagine that rather than strangling Bart, Homer Simpson took Bart to a court and had them decide whether Bart should die..

Guy has a book called "God's Law."

Probably rails against "Sharia Law."

And unironically refers to himself and others as "patriots."

The level of hypocrisy within the republican party is staggering, and often times it's some batshit crazy stuff like this. It's not enough that they complain about spending and then spend like it's going out of style, no no, they talk about family values and then captain christian here thinks it should be ok to have a court decide that a child should die for being a little prick. Hell, fits in with Michael Savage's theory, if the little shit won't shut up after being smacked around a few times, take him in and let a court decide if he deserves to die.

How in the living hell is this the party of morals?

Originally Posted by Clak Oh you've got to love republicans. A fetus is sacred and anyone who aborts is a murderer, but after that little SOB is born, that's another story.... http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog...lious-children Let me sum it up like this, imagine that rather than strangling Bart, Homer Simpson took Bart to a court and had them decide whether Bart should die..

The Republican party should take a cue from Obama and drone strike misbehaving children.

Originally Posted by Clak The level of hypocrisy within the republican party is staggering, and often times it's some batshit crazy stuff like this. It's not enough that they complain about spending and then spend like it's going out of style, no no, they talk about family values and then captain christian here thinks it should be ok to have a court decide that a child should die for being a little prick. Hell, fits in with Michael Savage's theory, if the little shit won't shut up after being smacked around a few times, take him in and let a court decide if he deserves to die. How in the living hell is this the party of morals?

Getting your morals from the Bible is a bad place to start anyway.

Advertisement

Register for free to remove this ad

Originally Posted by cancerman1120 Getting your morals from the Bible is a bad place to start anyway.

this coming from one of the most anti-organized christianity posters here, it's actually not all that bad. Jesus was a pretty ok dude. Care for those less fortunate than you isn't exactly a terrible life goal.

Originally Posted by nasum this coming from one of the most anti-organized christianity posters here, it's actually not all that bad. Jesus was a pretty ok dude. Care for those less fortunate than you isn't exactly a terrible life goal.

Problem is many Christians today would call Jesus a socialist hippie if he was running for President. In principle, Jesus taught a lot of good but in practice his followers have kind of missed the point.

like ghandi said, I like your christ but I'm not so fond of your christians

I find most Christians these days don't even seem to understand their own religion. I'd even wager to say that plenty of atheist liberals are more Christian than many conservative Christians. Jesus never said "Give them not, for they should stop being lazy and get a ing job."

edit- nasum I swear I was thinking the exact same thing, just didn't write it.

One of our local scumbags, gotta love it.

http://news.yahoo.com/transcript-rep...-election.html

"You told me you'd have an abortion, and now we're getting too far along without one," DesJarlais is quoted as saying. "If we need to go to Atlanta, or whatever, to get this solved and get it over with so we can get on with our lives, then let's do it."

He's "pro-life" btw.

Originally Posted by Clak One of our local scumbags, gotta love it. http://news.yahoo.com/transcript-rep...-election.html He's "pro-life" btw.

As hypocritical as his stance is, I find it even more disturbing that the woman was not only his mistress at the time, but one of his patients.

Yeah like I said, a real scumbag. Sad thing is he's running for re-election. Yeah, he already one the last time. This state makes me sick sometimes.

One thing is for sure - that is going to be one stupid ugly baby