Originally Posted by VipFREAK Can we legislate a law for Debates where the candidates have to I dunno... Give facts or actual details on HOW they will do something... Or better yet, not be able to say what everyone wants to hear... ?

There are plenty of details. Don't blame the candidates for your inability to pick up on them.

Originally Posted by cancerman1120 I can tell Obama is doing well because my Brother in Law is yelling at the tv every time he speaks.

LOLZ

Someone needs to remind Mittens he sent jobs to China.

Ha! He came through small business. I think you mean you crushed businesses to make money.

When a moderator says "you have 2 min." Are they speaking of Football or Baseball time length... ?

Originally Posted by Purple Flames Someone needs to remind Mittens he sent jobs to China.

http://factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-...cer-overreach/

Originally Posted by cancerman1120 I can tell Obama is doing well because my Brother in Law is yelling at the tv every time he speaks.

It helps when he isnt stuttering and going "um...uh...uh..." during each point. He is looking much better tonight.

As for debates being factual, I think they should have some of those fact checking sites stream stuff at the bottom of the screen or something. Some way to call them both out on bs when its spoken.

Originally Posted by 4thHorseman It helps when he isnt stuttering and going "um...uh...uh..." during each point. He is looking much better tonight. As for debates being factual, I think they should have some of those fact checking sites stream stuff at the bottom of the screen or something. Some way to call them both out on bs when its spoken.

There's more than one site doing live factchecking.

Originally Posted by dohdough There's more than one site doing live factchecking.

I'm actually curious to what some of the sites are that aren't biased (hell if there are any...), got any examples?

WTF Candy? Let Romney go on a huge rant and then change the subject.

Originally Posted by dohdough There's more than one site doing live factchecking.

Yeah, but I mean specifically for people watching the debate so they dont have to search it out. Especially since people could find misleading sites to get their information.

Obama is going to use money saved by ending unfunded wars? Sounds like creative accounting........Even MSNBC cried foul on that lie.

Originally Posted by tgk2044 I'm actually curious to what some of the sites are that aren't biased (hell if there are any...), got any examples?

I think we can trust WashPo, but it really depends on what you mean by "not biased."

The flow of this debate is making Romney look pretty good, performance wise so far. It's a shame Obama couldn't bring video recordings of Romney, especially during from during the primary, to respond to Romney's new and 'improved' Debate 2 reboot.

Originally Posted by ID2006 The flow of this debate is making Romney look pretty good, performance wise so far. It's a shame Obama couldn't bring video recordings of Romney, especially during from during the primary, to respond to Romney's new and 'improved' Debate 2 reboot.

Yeah...he's a walking Etch-a-Sketch.

I love listening to them try talking over each other, especially when one is completely off topic.

Advertisement

Register for free to remove this ad

100 to 1 Obama doesn't answer that question. Outside chance he throws Hillary under the bus.

Originally Posted by dafoomie 100 to 1 Obama doesn't answer that question. Outside chance he throws Hillary under the bus.

Wish I had taken that bet.

Of these jobs created by these untouchable small businesses, how many are jobs which require a real education? I ask because knowing that a McDonalds restaurant is a small business, I have my doubts about the jobs being created by these businesses.

Originally Posted by mykevermin Wish I had taken that bet.

'I mean what I say' might qualify as a statement but it isn't an answer to the question that was posed.

His whole policy in the Middle East. Mitt can just suck me.