bengals are now at 53 signed a TE to make it 3 there and signed a FB to have 3 there never gonig to see the field ever and they are cheap my cap space now sits at 11.49 mil

i feel something bad is about to happen :(

Originally Posted by DVO21 bengals are now at 53 signed a TE to make it 3 there and signed a FB to have 3 there never gonig to see the field ever and they are cheap my cap space now sits at 11.49 mil

You have three fullbacks? I don't think I've ever rolled with more than 1.

Eh, I didn't feel like you were trying to run up the score or anything. Just a shitty game overall by me.

I can't decide if I need better receivers or a better quarterback. My defense needs work, but that's more about putting in the effort rather than changing personnel. I've always been an offense-first player. It's almost like my offense was my defense, due to being able to score whenever I wanted, so it didn't really matter what my opponent did on offense. Now, my offense isn't producing, so my shoddy defense has been exposed. I just need to put in some work with it and hopefully turn things around.

sign guys to the line DVO dump the FB

Originally Posted by jza1218 You have three fullbacks? I don't think I've ever rolled with more than 1.

lol i need 53 players

Originally Posted by perdition(troy sign guys to the line DVO dump the FB

my line is good they have good injury rates and dont get tired i figured i will just sign players to sign players to be at 53 doesnt really matter any wherer they wont be used no matter where i sign them all with be useless lol. im going to run a full house with all 3 FBs

Originally Posted by DVO21 i feel something bad is about to happen :(

????

Originally Posted by CAGLeagueSports After our discussion requiring that all teams have 53 players on their roster, it was brought to my attention today that there are 12 user teams that have less than 53 players...and 3 user teams that have 48 or less. Here's a link with the specific numbers. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...2c&hl=en#gid=0 We need some explanations here. I would guess that teams with a lot of cap space just haven't bothered to go into free agency. But teams maxing out their cap and undercutting the 53 player roster standard just isn't acceptable. Everyone should be carrying 53 players.

Honestly, never paid attention to it. I'll sign two guys in the morning.

Originally Posted by jza1218 ????

NVM seems like that end well

Originally Posted by JoelyPoley Yea I didn't know what to do with a pick on the 20, so I ran it and he scored. I felt like a dick for trying to run out the clock lol

Understandable, but yeah...running the ball is all you can do, especially when your opponent is turning the ball over. Nobody should ever get upset about someone running the ball. And if they do, they would be the ones in the wrong. That's all anyone needs to worry about.

As for the roster issue, yeah, I figured the teams that were close was due to trades. It's really the teams at 46-48 players that alarms me the most, as that looks a bit more intentional. In case anyone is wondering, I don't expect the Panthers to fix their roster immediately. If staticz can just do his best to get the roster under control by the start of season 3, that's good enough for me.

i do have a question. ur up big in the 4th ur running and they cant stop it ur about to score times not even close to running out.

options are FG punt or TD its like 1st and goal type situation. u dont want to fee like a cocky prick either but u dont want to run up the score either

I didn't know we had to have 53 I cut players that really just sat on the bench so thats why I didn't have 53 people.

Advertisement

Register for free to remove this ad

No, I never intended it to sound like he just kept trying to score. Like I said, I should've conceded the game earlier, but I didn't. One of those late scores came from a pick 6, and my horrid run defense accounted for the others. But it wasn't like he kept on passing to put up more points.

advance n8!

Originally Posted by DVO21 i do have a question. ur up big in the 4th ur running and they cant stop it ur about to score times not even close to running out. options are FG punt or TD its like 1st and goal type situation. u dont want to fee like a cocky prick either but u dont want to run up the score either

When in doubt, run the ball. If you can't kneel to end the game, run the ball. If they give you a 4th down in field goal range, kick the field goal. It's crazy to keep explaining this, but the idea is to play completely minimalist, low risk football. Just take your downs, move the clock along, and let the game end.

Originally Posted by GpNinja I didn't know we had to have 53 I cut players that really just sat on the bench so thats why I didn't have 53 people.

Well, it wasn't officially stated, but once discussed, it was decided that it's really just something that makes sense. Otherwise, it basically allows teams to circumvent the salary cap by only paying for the minimum number of players.

ok sounds good

Can I get some opinions on this situation? I ended up punting, but I debated it for a while.

4th and 4 at my opponent's 47. I think it was 21-14 in the late 2nd quarter or early 3rd. I hadn't forced him to punt on any of his drives yet. He ultimately went up 28-14 and added more after that.

Hey Bucs owner! I can't accept your trade because your roster would exceed the maximum players. The Decker trade.

If I think I can beat my opponent once on a fourth down and I am on his territory and I think it will be a gamebreaker I'll go for it once. I won't go for fourth twice in a game, but if they haven't been stopping a money play of some sort I will give it a shot.