Originally Posted by mykevermin If you're like egofed, Lew Rockwell and Conservative Chicks on LSD (or whatever it is) are the best sources of information to cite.

Myke! My friend, your back. Care to admit your fault in our little exchange earlier? Or are you just gonna pretend it didn't happen. No worries, mate, I'm used to it from you guys.

That someone in that segment used the word "give"? , sure, what a huuuuuuge error on my part, I shall never be more ashamed in my life and stuff.

Meanwhile, you're still hanging your hat on the idea that no solutions were presented in that segment - no apology, no realization of how preposterously ing *imbecilic* you're being in that regard - willful, flagrant pants-on-backwards ignorance. Yet if you want to be that way and have a dance because you won a pitiful semantic argument, by all means.

Go treat yourself to a ing cupcake.

EDIT: You know what? I take it back. Eat a ing dick. Go get me a timestamp on that segment when someone SAYS "Giving People Money. It's Actually That Easy."

You hung your hat on that, you bitched and moaned for your Pyrrhic victory, and you got it - when you shouldn't have. Go watch that segment (again, if you're to be believed). Give me a time stamp when a person on that segment SAYS anything about "giving" people money. Past tense, present, future, past perfect - any conjugation.

Then disappear from this thread 'cause you have no ing dignity.

Originally Posted by Clak Has he used The Blaze yet?

LOLZ...that's a dumb question.

Originally Posted by mykevermin "give" is your verb, so perhaps you could improve your stance by not attributing *your* verbiage to other people, and then using that stance to show what "they" said. (and that's without getting to the core of needing to define a term as the last bastion for internet debate. just give up now, gramps.)

Hahahahahahahahaahahahahhaaaaa.....way to man up and admit you made a mistake. Have a little dignity, man. People up from time to time. You sound like a little bitch when you get all crybaby like that. You accused ME of putting that word in other mouths, so, yeah, I take false accusations strongly.

Anyway, I said no "real" solutions were presented. They talk about "incentives", which I strongly believe in, but welfare and SNAP are just incentives to many to continue generational poverty. The gov't should ensure equal treatment, Not equal outcomes, it should NOT be a nanny state offering treats and rewards to selfish, lazy people who are too ignorant or stupid to want to better themselves. Communities need to come together and arrange childcare and work programs. You don't work, you don't eat. Having kids without resources is the parents' fault, not society. Do you think we are doing the kids a favor by leaving them in the hands of these morons? Detropia has the idea of urban farmlands. The residents interviewed were down on the idea while demanding more services from the bankrupt city. Culturing dependency on a failing system is not a viable solution.

Originally Posted by mykevermin That someone in that segment used the word "give"? , sure, what a huuuuuuge error on my part, I shall never be more ashamed in my life and stuff. Meanwhile, you're still hanging your hat on the idea that no solutions were presented in that segment - no apology, no realization of how preposterously ing *imbecilic* you're being in that regard - willful, flagrant pants-on-backwards ignorance. Yet if you want to be that way and have a dance because you won a pitiful semantic argument, by all means. Go treat yourself to a ing cupcake. EDIT: You know what? I take it back. Eat a ing dick. Go get me a timestamp on that segment when someone SAYS "Giving People Money. It's Actually That Easy." You hung your hat on that, you bitched and moaned for your Pyrrhic victory, and you got it - when you shouldn't have. Go watch that segment (again, if you're to be believed). Give me a time stamp when a person on that segment SAYS anything about "giving" people money. Past tense, present, future, past perfect - any conjugation. Then disappear from this thread 'cause you have no ing dignity.

At the end of the first segment, as I've already stated. The MSNBC "anchors" offer up their solutions to poverty via written word. The little guy with glasses holds up his saying "Giving People Money. It's Actually That Easy."

I pointed this out three times now. Will you remove yourself from the thread now?

I prefer that you didn't actually, you are hilarious when you throw a sissy fit. Way to keep the conversation civil, rational, and clean.



Hahahahahahaaa...just thought of the image of you feverishly watching and rewatching that terrible segment hoping to not see that word.....

Originally Posted by egofed I pointed this out three times now

Links. Make it happen.

Advertisement

Register for free to remove this ad

Originally Posted by mykevermin Links. Make it happen.

Ask nicely, in a civilized and respectable manner. Please.