Advertisement

Register for free to remove this ad

IGN Star Wars Trilogy Review Part 1

why review a movie so old? thats dumb its the same movie its just on dvd

www.thedigitalbits.com

has a full review with screen shot changes.

I cannot wait!

Originally Posted by Birakon why review a movie so old? thats dumb its the same movie its just on dvd

Unfortunately, that's not the case...

That Naboo scene looks like crap.

Oh god I just learned they changed Fett's voice.

Worst edit so far, kill me now.

Originally Posted by Sartori Oh god I just learned they changed Fett's voice. Worst edit so far, kill me now.

Yeah, this one didn't make sense to me. They say that his voice should match Jango's 'because he is a clone of Jango'. Is he not Jango's son?

Well, he's a clone - yeah. But that doesn't mean he can't be his own. Jango sucked 100%. It's bad enough that when I watch Episode II I get to see a whiny kid and all in place of my favorite Star Wars character - but now I get to be reminded of it with that annoying accent Jango has.

Originally Posted by Ledhed Yeah, this one didn't make sense to me. They say that his voice should match Jango's 'because he is a clone of Jango'. Is he not Jango's son?

Jango asked that the Kaminoans create an unaltered clone for him,hence Boba is an exact duplicate of himself.

Originally Posted by Sartori Oh god I just learned they changed Fett's voice. Worst edit so far, kill me now.

wtf why would they change his voice, goddamit

Sheesh, piss and moan....deal with it.....

I thought more people would bitch about inserting Hayden Christenson in at the end of Jedi.

Originally Posted by doubledown Sheesh, piss and moan....deal with it..... I thought more people would bitch about inserting Hayden Christenson in at the end of Jedi.

They tie in my book.

Changing Boba's voice does suck, even though he only has like two or three lines in the whole trilogy. What I don't understand is why Pigman wants the original trilogy to conform to the new trilogy. He should be distancing himself from them new movies, and blame them on a bad acid trip in a few years, or something.

IMO the original movies owned and they never should have made these new ones. The Trilogy would be untouched and I wouldn't have to see shitty new star wars movies.

I'm starting to be glad I held onto my laser disc versions... from the early 90's before Lucas went.... insane.

trakan no one is making you watch them

im torn, i mean its dvd... i love dvds, the quality the sound... but these mutilated versions of the trilogy, somebody should kill lucas, or throw him in the nut house, he obviously lost it long ago

After reading the review, it seems that most changes will be either improvements, or have little to no change to the films at all. The execptions are the Han / Greedo scene (improved from 1997, but still inferior to the original), and, much worse, the Emporer knowing and revealing Luke's relationship with Vader. This destroys what is possibly the most powerful scene in the Trilogy. By revealing this bit of information early, it denies the audience the moment of shock when Vader reveals this fact to Luke. While this may not seem a big deal to us, who have known about this secret for most of our lives, the fact is, many who are watching the films for the first time, will be watching this version.

Originally Posted by Birakon trakan no one is making you watch them

Yeah, I'm fully aware of that. I was just giving my opinion.

Sheesh...fanboys....I'm not worried one bit about the changes. Ok, so they are NOT the exact same when they came out.....it's still technically the same movie.


I for one will be buying the DVD's come Sept.21st!