Advertisement

Register for free to remove this ad

^ Damn. Looks like Nadine Valezquez

Originally Posted by cancerman1120 Ok we have our first picture of this "irresistible" woman. I am no looker but this woman is 32 and looks almost 10 years older in the pic. She must have a banging body because I am not seeing it. Sorry if that is sexist but I am starting to think we are not getting the whole story here.

The "whole story" in my opinion is that this sleazeball had been hitting on her for months and they were both mere weeks from giving in an cheating. The wife found out about it through the texts and told the husband to fire her. The husband agreed to it because he knew how guilty he was and that he was planning on trying to sleep with her. The wife then likely suggested told the husband he was going to pray to god for forgiveness and have the pastor there. The wife then probably stood over his shoulder while he wrote his prepared speech (or maybe even wrote it for him) for when he fires the assistant. The dentist is a complete sleaze who knew he wanted to cheat but as soon as he got caught he wanted to do anything to keep his wife happy.

I'm still baffled as to why this wasn't a sexual
harassment claim, it would seem to me to be a much easier claim than sexual discrimination. The crappy part of our legal system is just that sometimes the bad guy does have to win. I doubt this case should do anything to get the legislature change discrimination laws (particularly title vii which is essentially set in stone at this point) but perhaps in the aggregate it will start to move the needle...

Originally Posted by DietPepsi leav the law 2 the laywer not the "armchair lawyer" that is interet slang 4 "wanabe lawyer"

Judges shouldn't be elected positions.

Thanks for the reminder, Iowa.

I'm starting to think we have a troll infestation or something...unless CAG was featured on a major blog site recently.

Originally Posted by GBAstar ^ Damn. Looks like Nadine Valezquez

Yeah that woman in the video is very attractive. The thing is if the outfits in the video were the actual clothes she was getting in trouble for wearing then I have no idea what a woman with those curves has to wear. Yeah she looked hot in those clothes but she is completely covered up. This has a lot to do with "powerful" men's insecurities and less about "sex".

Originally Posted by cancerman1120 Yeah that woman in the video is very attractive. The thing is if the outfits in the video were the actual clothes she was getting in trouble for wearing then I have no idea what a woman with those curves has to wear. Yeah she looked hot in those clothes but she is completely covered up. This has a lot to do with "powerful" men's insecurities and less about "sex".

You should pull up some pics of the douche and his wife that happens to work in the practice with them.

Originally Posted by dohdough You should pull up some pics of the douche and his wife that happens to work in the practice with them.

Yeah I am not above posting their pics on here either.



After watching her talk about this I am even more pissed something like this happened. Did not realize she was married also.

I love reading some of the comments on various websites. Here is a good one.

"A non-issue. In reality, an employer can fire anyone for pretty much any reason they choose, so long as it's not discrimination. In this case, it wasn't discrimination, it was just a personal issue. The fact that it was HIS personal issue doesn't change a thing. Sure, it wasn't her fault--but he's the employer, he's not going to fire himself. What difference does it make whether he fired her because he didn't like her voice, or couldn't keep his eyes off of her? Whether he didn't like her handwriting, or the way she stacked papers? You can fire someone for any of those reasons. Let it go"

That is exactly what is being argued here dummy. Yes the Iowa Supreme Court ruled in his favor but that does not mean it was the right decision. Also it is good to know that a "personal issue" is not discrimination. What if you have a "personal issue" with minorities?

I would've posted the one with his douche bag tribal tat..heh

Would've done it myself if I didn't have to post from my tablet the for the past few days or the next for that matter.

Originally Posted by DietPepsi leav the law 2 the laywer not the "armchair lawyer" that is interet slang 4 "wanabe lawyer"

For the record, my posts were informed by an actual attorney, a female attorney I might add

I don't see what this douche sees in that blonde chick. Not so 'irresistible'. The one in the video though... WOAH... I can see how that could be a problem for guys lol

I completely disagree with the outcome of this case.

I also completely disagree with this woman being so irresistible as she and the media claim.

Attractive, sure. Would I hit it, sure. Is she a big deal? Nope.

I love how the male members of CAG are coming out and judging this woman to be "not irresistible" based only on her looks and without knowing anything about her personality.

Stay classy.

Originally Posted by UncleBob I love how the male members of CAG are coming out and judging this woman to be "not irresistible" based only on her looks and without knowing anything about her personality. Stay classy.

You do realize she went to the media and was like "I'm fired because I'm so hot. I'm irresistible". Her arrogance is laughable. Most occasions when someone talks about being irresistible they are talking about looks...not about her personality or if she likes anime and lord of the rings.

Originally Posted by UncleBob I love how the male members of CAG are coming out and judging this woman to be "not irresistible" based only on her looks and without knowing anything about her personality. Stay classy.

Considering we only have her picture to judge her by it seems appropriate.

1.) Yeah, keep in mind we're talking Iowa irresistible and not Scarlett Johannsjesuschristthey'rebigandfirmandherlipsaream azingandgodddayumthatassen irresistible.

2.) Not worth screwing up your life over either way

3.) Dude, seriously, control your cock. Failing that, go rub one out if it's that bad. Now that you're set for a huge lawsuit, welcome to your forthcoming poverty. Give everything to your lady before your hygenist takes it all.

Originally Posted by Calipso You do realize she went to the media and was like "I'm fired because I'm so hot. I'm irresistible".

Do you have a link to that article?

Originally Posted by cancerman1120 Considering we only have her picture to judge her by it seems appropriate.

Ah. Like judging Trayvon Martin by his photos. Sounds like a fair way to live your life.

Originally Posted by UncleBob Ah. Like judging Trayvon Martin by his photos. Sounds like a fair way to live your life.

Yes deciding on someones "attractiveness" based on a photo is exactly the same thing.

I guess I should feel good that I have finally been trolled by you. Makes me feel like I am truly a part of Vs now.

Again, it's male members of CAG judging a woman's attractiveness based on nothing but her looks. Bonus that the topic is one of gender discrimination.

Stay Classy.

You don't have just pictures of her, you have all the interviews she's done since the incident. Sadly, those post-incident interviews weren't possible with Trayvon.