Also,
Edited by CheapyD, 24 March 2009 - 06:19 AM.
add link
Posted 22 March 2009 - 08:40 PM
Edited by CheapyD, 24 March 2009 - 06:19 AM.
add link
Posted 22 March 2009 - 08:50 PM
Posted 22 March 2009 - 11:36 PM
Posted 22 March 2009 - 11:38 PM

Posted 22 March 2009 - 11:38 PM
Posted 22 March 2009 - 11:49 PM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 12:12 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 01:21 AM
dude the single player is totally worth it!
Posted 23 March 2009 - 01:33 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 02:49 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 03:24 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 03:31 AM
I rented this one. Never having played the 360 version, I have to say it wasn't that bad, framerate seemed to hold up, I never had any issues. It also has all of the downloadable content from the 360 version already in the game.
Posted 23 March 2009 - 04:20 AM

Posted 23 March 2009 - 04:32 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 04:33 AM
i think i read that this one is really inferior to the 360 version....anyone confirm this?
Posted 23 March 2009 - 04:35 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 05:45 AM
Last time I played this, it didn't even support in game XMB. That was months ago though.
And yes, framerate issues. Also very ugly compared to the 360 version.
Posted 23 March 2009 - 05:46 AM

Posted 23 March 2009 - 05:49 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 05:53 AM
What?
How can a game not support in game XMB?
I got this game summer of last year $15 used and I'm certain it worked
Posted 23 March 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 06:06 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 06:16 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 06:18 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 06:21 AM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 05:38 PM
But for $28 you get the Colonies edition for the 360. So, not only are you not paying for a poorly done port, you'd be getting the superior version, which includes a bunch of new content.
Posted 23 March 2009 - 07:29 PM
Posted 23 March 2009 - 07:58 PM
Edited by jrsmaster411, 23 March 2009 - 08:31 PM.
Posted 23 March 2009 - 09:07 PM
