I guess this was inevitable in Taxachusetts....
Edited by jimijumper, 14 December 2012 - 01:11 AM.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 12:55 AM
Edited by jimijumper, 14 December 2012 - 01:11 AM.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 03:27 AM
Link to story
I guess this was inevitable in Taxachusetts....
Posted 14 December 2012 - 02:49 PM
Ironically enough, MA actually has some of the lowest taxes in the country unless we're talking tobacco. Then again, we still have until 11/1/13 to make all those sales tax free purchases. Because of this announcement, I'm joining the Tea Party.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 05:50 PM
You're going to start seeing more tax hikes... I mean how else do you expect to fund free sex changes for state prisoners?
Posted 14 December 2012 - 05:57 PM
Blinded by the light!
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:16 PM
You're supposed to pay in-state sales tax regardless of where you shop, so yes, it's legal. That's why there's a line item specifically on the MA state income tax form for it. All this does is close the loophole on the honor system for self-reporting when buying from Amazon.Isn't this still illegal? Isn't the law that you have to have a company presence in the state in order to charge sale tax? If Amazon wants to give Mass some new jobs I'm all for it.
The thing is, I'll still order from them, they still have cheaper prices and I trust them. If I buy from BestBuy.com or Amazon it doesn't make a difference because I still don't go into a store.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:21 PM
In Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, the Supreme Court ruled that a business must have a physical presence in a state for that state to require it to collect sales taxes. However, the court explicitly stated that Congress can overrule the decision through legislation.
Blinded by the light!
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:23 PM
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:35 PM
Taxes on online purchases have no impact on my shopping. I shop online for the convenience of not having to find time to fight traffic and get to the store, deal with people etc. I order mostly from Amazon as I've had great experience with them, have Prime for free two day shipping (and the streaming video and Kindle lending library) etc. I don't even really bother checking if they have the cheapest price anymore when it comes to most of the things I order from there (games, movies, books etc.).
Blinded by the light!
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:38 PM
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:42 PM

Aminal Crossing: Strell@Tazmily, 2836-3590- 0819
"One of the more...amusing screwballs around here..." - shrike4242
Join the El Hoardo Fan Club!
Threadless.com puts the fun back in laundry!...lafundry! HOORAY! (Referral link)
Wii Obscure FAQ and Facts Thread [Version 2.0] ::: Wii Shop Thread ::: DSi Shop Thread
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:42 PM
Yeah exactly. Are books going to be cheaper in B&N or Amazon? I mean the government is claiming it's to help local companies, it won't do sht for local companies and the know it. The state just wants more money to waste.
I will hopefully not be living in the state anyways.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:48 PM

Aminal Crossing: Strell@Tazmily, 2836-3590- 0819
"One of the more...amusing screwballs around here..." - shrike4242
Join the El Hoardo Fan Club!
Threadless.com puts the fun back in laundry!...lafundry! HOORAY! (Referral link)
Wii Obscure FAQ and Facts Thread [Version 2.0] ::: Wii Shop Thread ::: DSi Shop Thread
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:50 PM
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:54 PM
Uhhh...it's money that the state is already supposed to be getting to begin with.Yeah exactly. Are books going to be cheaper in B&N or Amazon? I mean the government is claiming it's to help local companies, it won't do sht for local companies and the know it. The state just wants more money to waste.
The grass is always greener...I will hopefully not be living in the state anyways.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:56 PM
Posted 14 December 2012 - 06:56 PM
Are you volunteering your backyard or are you willing to have one as your neighbor?If Massachusetts really wants more spending money, then they should've gotten those casinos built a long time ago. Gambling folks willingly hand over their cash and they've been happily doing so across the border.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:08 PM
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:14 PM
Visiting a place is different from living there. But since you avoided answering the question, I can safely conclude that you'd have no interest in living next to a casino.Typical city backyard isn't going to fit anything, but the few occasions I've gone to the CT casinos the surrounding areas didn't look any worse for wear.
Foxborough peeps were getting their panties in a bunch, the random Everett residents that were interviewed on the news seemed to be pretty happy about the possibility of having a casino in their backyard.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:20 PM
Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:48 PM
I'm fully aware of the negative effects, both socially and economically, of having a casino in a community. Saying that it's be no different from the present level of the visibility of drug addicts is mind-numbingly naive. There are always marked increases in alcoholism, domestic violence, drug addiction, prostitution, theft, and overall violence. There have been enough studies done that this should be common knowledge and easily avaliable for the remotely curious. Why should I need to know first hand what it's like to live next to a casino when there's literally mountains of data that support my position? Would I have to grow up next to the Combat Zone to know how bad it would be for a community in order to speak out against it? Stop being obtuse.Well what experience do you have in regards to living next to a casino? I don't have an answer because I don't know. It can't be worse than the druggies skulking around the city parks and homes. Mind you, I don't live in the ghetto, but the unsavory are still visible. No diff to me then.
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:12 PM
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:32 PM