Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Just another example of hypocrisy by Obama....


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 05:29 AM

After a day of ranting about income inequality Obama hits the links owned by billionare Oracle founder Larry Ellison. "Do as I say, not as I do".

http://www.americant...illionaire.html

#2 Syntax Error

Syntax Error

    Tortue d'Art

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 05:52 AM

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be outraged about.  The general theme of "income inequality" is that the poor are too poor, not necessarily that the rich are too rich.  If Obama is advocating for making the poor less poor and theoretically closer to "privately owned golf course", what exactly is the problem?

 

I do like the ass-covering the article tries to do though: "Oh, Obama hates the rich!  Well, not these rich... but he does hate the rich!  Those rich!  Those are the guys he hates!  Look at him playing on a luxury privately owned golf course -- What a Marxist, am I right?"


Backlog Alphabet: Working my backlog A to Z [Blog Updated on Jan 28 - New Final Entry, Now With The Letter Z!]


#3 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 09:17 AM

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be outraged about.  The general theme of "income inequality" is that the poor are too poor, not necessarily that the rich are too rich.  If Obama is advocating for making the poor less poor and theoretically closer to "privately owned golf course", what exactly is the problem?
 
I do like the ass-covering the article tries to do though: "Oh, Obama hates the rich!  Well, not these rich... but he does hate the rich!  Those rich!  Those are the guys he hates!  Look at him playing on a luxury privately owned golf course -- What a Marxist, am I right?"


Not ass covering at all, if you would notice he only likes the rich that donate to his cause... millions of dollars in fact. The outrage comes from the fact that its never been about income inequality to begin with. He is a fraud for trying to make us believe that, it is just about power grabbing and votes (nothing new). But I don't blame him for thinking he can pull the wool over the American people's eyes, he got elected twice after all and that is proof enough how ignorant the populace is.

Also the fact that you can't see the hypocrisy of this entire scenario gravely concerns me.

#4 renique46

renique46

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 11:39 AM

We get it, you don't like Obama. Talk about broken fucking record at this point.



#5 Syntax Error

Syntax Error

    Tortue d'Art

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 03:18 PM

Not ass covering at all, if you would notice he only likes the rich that donate to his cause... millions of dollars in fact. The outrage comes from the fact that its never been about income inequality to begin with. He is a fraud for trying to make us believe that, it is just about power grabbing and votes (nothing new). But I don't blame him for thinking he can pull the wool over the American people's eyes, he got elected twice after all and that is proof enough how ignorant the populace is.

Also the fact that you can't see the hypocrisy of this entire scenario gravely concerns me.

 

"Only likes rich that donate to his cause"?  Seriously?  As opposed to the GOP praise for Soros and Buffett?  That's the best you have to say that Obama must hate the rich even though he's hanging around with them?

 

I'm not going to waste a lot of time trying to argue his motivations because neither of us can prove what he's thinking.  But this article was a joke.  Obama goes to luxury private golf courses... but he's a Marxist.  Obama doesn't care at all about income inequality... but he's REALLY a Marxist, honest!  Do you guys just have no idea what "Marxist" means?  I mean, beyond as a buzzword and verbal boogeyman?

 

"Grave concern" indeed :lol:


Backlog Alphabet: Working my backlog A to Z [Blog Updated on Jan 28 - New Final Entry, Now With The Letter Z!]


#6 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 08:10 PM

"Only likes rich that donate to his cause"?  Seriously?  As opposed to the GOP praise for Soros and Buffett?  That's the best you have to say that Obama must hate the rich even though he's hanging around with them?
 
I'm not going to waste a lot of time trying to argue his motivations because neither of us can prove what he's thinking.  But this article was a joke.  Obama goes to luxury private golf courses... but he's a Marxist.  Obama doesn't care at all about income inequality... but he's REALLY a Marxist, honest!  Do you guys just have no idea what "Marxist" means?  I mean, beyond as a buzzword and verbal boogeyman?
 
"Grave concern" indeed :lol:


You clearly don't understand what Marxism is about. It is about power through the government and controlling the people. He can precisely DO all those things because he is a Marxist and he is the president. I can't believe how ridiculously uniformed you are. Under Marxism essentially the upper 1% is the government and the guy at the top is of course the President which he has now turned into a socialist state.

#7 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 08:11 PM

We get it, you don't like Obama. Talk about broken fucking record at this point.


When are you going to learn its not about liking and disliking someone, this isn't a popularity contest this is about pointing out how much of a fraud he is and if people like you don't wake up you are going to wonder why your standard of living keeps decreasing.

#8 Syntax Error

Syntax Error

    Tortue d'Art

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 08:41 PM

You clearly don't understand what Marxism is about. It is about power through the government and controlling the people.

 

Haha, well gee you got me there.  :lol:

 

Let me guess, in another couple years Obama will end free elections in the US to hold power?  I mean, what's the use of spending years creating a socialist dictatorship if you're going to be out of the game before it happens?


Backlog Alphabet: Working my backlog A to Z [Blog Updated on Jan 28 - New Final Entry, Now With The Letter Z!]


#9 RedvsBlue

RedvsBlue

    Rocket Science Level

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 19 February 2014 - 09:16 PM

Man, Glenn Beck really has fallen pretty far since Fox dropped him, slummin' it up on political subforums of video game websites an' all...



#10 Spokker

Spokker

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 02:12 AM

I would think that a progressive would wonder why a man needs so many acres for such a silly game that historically has excluded all but rich, white men.

Surely that land would be better used for low-income housing.

#11 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 01:32 PM

Haha, well gee you got me there.  :lol:
 
Let me guess, in another couple years Obama will end free elections in the US to hold power?  I mean, what's the use of spending years creating a socialist dictatorship if you're going to be out of the game before it happens?


It is not about him it is about keeping the party in power. Do I have to literally draw a road map for you?

#12 egofed

egofed

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 02:10 PM

I agree that his position on income inequality could be greatly helped in the public eye if he didn't live so extravagantly. Live modestly for 4 years and you would go down in history as a man of the people who practiced what he preached. THEN live like the elitist political class for the rest of your life. O:)



#13 Syntax Error

Syntax Error

    Tortue d'Art

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 05:05 PM

It is not about him it is about keeping the party in power. Do I have to literally draw a road map for you?

 
Please do.  Because I always find these conspiracy theories interesting, especially when they try to connect it all to an end game.
 
So rather than your umpteen attempts to shame me with "Oh no, I can't believe you're so dumb!" ( :roll: ) what you're giving me here is that Obama is a radical Marxist who wants to consolidate all the power into a totalitarian government to control the people... and then leave government.
 

Under Marxism essentially the upper 1% is the government and the guy at the top is of course the President which he has now turned into a socialist state.


But, again, he won't be the president by the time this comes to pass. So now you're rushing to move the goal posts and say "No! Really it's all about the party!"

 

Can you come up with something better than that?  Or do you need to try and hurt my feelings again?  I've heard that sometimes works when you don't have an actual argument.


Backlog Alphabet: Working my backlog A to Z [Blog Updated on Jan 28 - New Final Entry, Now With The Letter Z!]


#14 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 22 February 2014 - 01:45 AM

Please do.  Because I always find these conspiracy theories interesting, especially when they try to connect it all to an end game.
 
So rather than your umpteen attempts to shame me with "Oh no, I can't believe you're so dumb!" ( :roll: ) what you're giving me here is that Obama is a radical Marxist who wants to consolidate all the power into a totalitarian government to control the people... and then leave government.
 

But, again, he won't be the president by the time this comes to pass. So now you're rushing to move the goal posts and say "No! Really it's all about the party!"
 
Can you come up with something better than that?  Or do you need to try and hurt my feelings again?  I've heard that sometimes works when you don't have an actual argument.


Because of all the favors he has done for his puppetmasters like George Soros they will make sure he is well taken care of while the rest of America suffers. You could clearly see him trying to do that with Solyndra and all these green energy companies that failed miserably and went under... costing the taxpayers millions of dollars due to his incompetence.

That was a case of "You scratch my back, and I will scratch yours", only this time it became public knowledge much to his dismay and it failed.

You need to come up with something better than "Yeah but he won't be the president anymore", he doesn't care about being the President when he gets out, his side of the isle will make sure he stays at the top 1% and thanks to his phony books he wrote which were mostly lies (don't believe me, just google yourself) he is sitting comfortably as a millionaire while his policies have made millions lose money and become broke.

It is clear you are in Obama's corner but try to have some ounce of objectivity when actually looking at the facts. You seem to skim over all his failures (which there are a ton of).

#15 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 22 February 2014 - 02:59 AM

A Soros reference? LOLZ...which banned CAG are you? SgtMurder?
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#16 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 22 February 2014 - 03:58 AM

A Soros reference? LOLZ...which banned CAG are you? SgtMurder?


Another person who can't rebuttal facts

#17 RedvsBlue

RedvsBlue

    Rocket Science Level

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 22 February 2014 - 01:42 PM

Another person who can't rebuttal facts

*rebut

Similarly you could have used "counter", but "rebuttal" is a noun, not a verb as you used it in your post.

A Soros reference? LOLZ...which banned CAG are you? SgtMurder?

I remember that guy. We can only hope this is him so he eventually loses his mind and starts posting nonsense/trolling again getting himself banned.

#18 UncleBob

UncleBob

Posted 22 February 2014 - 03:19 PM

lol... previously banned forum members posting conspiracy theories about previously banned forum members.
"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy, instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it."

#19 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 22 February 2014 - 03:45 PM

Another person who can't rebuttal facts


What facts? That you have no idea what Marxism is? That fascism or plutocracy are actually a more accurate terms?

Marxism is a critique of capitalism; not an advocate.

Oh and I could care less about your refudiating because for all intensive purposes, you have absolutely no clue about the concepts you're talking about, irregardless of your ability to parrot talking points.
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#20 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:34 AM

What facts? That you have no idea what Marxism is? That fascism or plutocracy are actually a more accurate terms?

Marxism is a critique of capitalism; not an advocate.

Oh and I could care less about your refudiating because for all intensive purposes, you have absolutely no clue about the concepts you're talking about, irregardless of your ability to parrot talking points.


Talk about rehashing the same old tactics. You always play this sad little game when facts slap you in the face, you always come back with that the other person has no what so and so is.

And no you care WAY too much, because if you didn't care at all you wouldn't respond in the first place. So keep it up with the same old drivel.

#21 Msut77

Msut77

    Occam's Shank

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 23 February 2014 - 10:36 AM

Defining terms is a tactic?
wahhhhh noone helped me so they must not help anyone. - knoell

#22 Syntax Error

Syntax Error

    Tortue d'Art

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 24 February 2014 - 12:42 AM

You need to come up with something better than...

 

Me?  I'm not the one with the insane conspiracy theories and jumping up and down hooting about Obama being a hypocrite.  I don't need to come up with anything.  You're trying to advance your little scary stories and failing miserably at it.  Whether or not you continue to believe them really doesn't worry me.  I'm not under the delusion that I can heal the mentally ill via the internet.


Backlog Alphabet: Working my backlog A to Z [Blog Updated on Jan 28 - New Final Entry, Now With The Letter Z!]


#23 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 24 February 2014 - 04:20 PM

I remember that guy. We can only hope this is him so he eventually loses his mind and starts posting nonsense/trolling again getting himself banned.


I've been dumpster diving into old threads and I finally figured out the Soros reference! It was Vader582 from this thread:

http://www.cheapassg...sy-politicians/
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#24 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 25 February 2014 - 02:47 AM

I've been dumpster diving into old threads and I finally figured out the Soros reference! It was Vader582 from this thread:

http://www.cheapassg...sy-politicians/


Right, so your only tactic is to redefine terms incorrectly to fit your narrative and to accuse people of having alternate accounts.

Kind of obvious now when I visit every topic you are involved in everyone laughs it off at how much of a troll you are. It is just fun putting you in place constantly because liberals are so easy to prove wrong.

#25 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 25 February 2014 - 03:36 AM

Right, so your only tactic is to redefine terms incorrectly to fit your narrative and to accuse people of having alternate accounts.

Kind of obvious now when I visit every topic you are involved in everyone laughs it off at how much of a troll you are. It is just fun putting you in place constantly because liberals are so easy to prove wrong.


I'm pretty sure that Karl Marx was an economist that critiqued and described the conflicts of capitalism and that communism has something to do with a classless society and something about who owns the means of production(hint: it isn't capital), which is the exact opposite of how you're "defining" Marxism as a fascist plutocracy ruled by capital. I mean seriously, this is pretty basic political science here.

If I'm wrong, then prove it. Let's see some citations unless you think every form of media has a liberal bias. At that rate, you're just completely off your fucking rocker.
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#26 mykevermin

mykevermin

    Queen of Scotland

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 25 February 2014 - 06:09 PM

Oh, a Marxist expert, eh? What are your thoughts on The Eighteenth Brumaire? Care to...rebuttal...the thesis of that particular work?


Posted Image

#27 RPGNinja

RPGNinja

    CAG in Training

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 25 February 2014 - 11:00 PM

I'm pretty sure that Karl Marx was an economist that critiqued and described the conflicts of capitalism and that communism has something to do with a classless society and something about who owns the means of production(hint: it isn't capital), which is the exact opposite of how you're "defining" Marxism as a fascist plutocracy ruled by capital. I mean seriously, this is pretty basic political science here.

If I'm wrong, then prove it. Let's see some citations unless you think every form of media has a liberal bias. At that rate, you're just completely off your fucking rocker.


So now you have to backtrack and try t0 define your terms better. That is an improvement but I will start answering you when you actually read my posts and you take away more than just a "Soros" reference which proves how childish you really are and somehow that automatically disqualifies someone.

Go back and read your very first post in this topic, it is obvious you were not serious from the beginning so I can't treat you seriously either.

#28 dohdough

dohdough

    Sum Dum Guy

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 26 February 2014 - 01:10 AM

AHHAHAHAAHHA...holy shit. There have been some real knuckleheads on this forum, but it seems like you're seriously running to be head of that class. Are you going to tell us about the Trilateral Commission and the Illuminati next? Don't forget about Bilderberg and the Stonecutters! :rofl:

The only thing to be taken from your posts is that it's bad performance art. If you're going to troll, at least try to do it well.
dohdough.png


"Speaking of which, there's another elitist prick that argues constantly on the Politics forums by the name of dohdough. He's a complete douche, but at least he keeps his posts in that cesspool of useless opinions. He gets my runner-up nomination."


Thanks for the nomination for the Most Memorable CAG Villan 2012, Blade!

#29 mykevermin

mykevermin

    Queen of Scotland

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 26 February 2014 - 04:19 AM

Gotta read Marx to understand Marx. Gotta understand Marx to critique Marx. He overlooked systemic racism as a mechanism to keep the proletariat perpetually divided, for instance.

 

I don't get folks who refuse to read classic works yet insist on critiquing the views of the authors. You've made it this far in life not letting facts get in the way of staunchly refusing to alter your worldview, why would one book be so fearful and dangerous?


Posted Image

#30 egofed

egofed

    CAGiversary!

  • CAGiversary!

Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:58 PM

AHHAHAHAAHHA...holy shit. There have been some real knuckleheads on this forum, but it seems like you're seriously running to be head of that class. Are you going to tell us about the Trilateral Commission and the Illuminati next? Don't forget about Bilderberg and the Stonecutters! :rofl:

The only thing to be taken from your posts is that it's bad performance art. If you're going to troll, at least try to do it well.

Shhhhh...Doh, your laughter will creep Msutt out. :rofl: