Not ass covering at all, if you would notice he only likes the rich that donate to his cause... millions of dollars in fact. The outrage comes from the fact that its never been about income inequality to begin with. He is a fraud for trying to make us believe that, it is just about power grabbing and votes (nothing new). But I don't blame him for thinking he can pull the wool over the American people's eyes, he got elected twice after all and that is proof enough how ignorant the populace is.
"Only likes rich that donate to his cause"? Seriously? As opposed to the GOP praise for Soros and Buffett? That's the best you have to say that Obama must hate the rich even though he's hanging around with them?
You clearly don't understand what Marxism is about. It is about power through the government and controlling the people. He can precisely DO all those things because he is a Marxist and he is the president. I can't believe how ridiculously uniformed you are. Under Marxism essentially the upper 1% is the government and the guy at the top is of course the President which he has now turned into a socialist state.
When are you going to learn its not about liking and disliking someone, this isn't a popularity contest this is about pointing out how much of a fraud he is and if people like you don't wake up you are going to wonder why your standard of living keeps decreasing.We get it, you don't like Obama. Talk about brokening record at this point.
Haha, well gee you got me there. :lol:
It is not about him it is about keeping the party in power. Do I have to literally draw a road map for you?
Please do. Because I always find these conspiracy theories interesting, especially when they try to connect it all to an end game.
) what you're giving me here is that Obama is a radical Marxist who wants to consolidate all the power into a totalitarian government to control the people... and then leave government.But, again, he won't be the president by the time this comes to pass. So now you're rushing to move the goal posts and say "No! Really it's all about the party!"
Because of all the favors he has done for his puppetmasters like George Soros they will make sure he is well taken care of while the rest of America suffers. You could clearly see him trying to do that with Solyndra and all these green energy companies that failed miserably and went under... costing the taxpayers millions of dollars due to his incompetence.Please do. Because I always find these conspiracy theories interesting, especially when they try to connect it all to an end game.
So rather than your umpteen attempts to shame me with "Oh no, I can't believe you're so dumb!" (
But, again, he won't be the president by the time this comes to pass. So now you're rushing to move the goal posts and say "No! Really it's all about the party!"
Can you come up with something better than that? Or do you need to try and hurt my feelings again? I've heard that sometimes works when you don't have an actual argument.
Another person who can't rebuttal facts
*rebut
I remember that guy. We can only hope this is him so he eventually loses his mind and starts posting nonsense/trolling again getting himself banned.
What facts? That you have no idea what Marxism is? That fascism or plutocracy are actually a more accurate terms?
Talk about rehashing the same old tactics. You always play this sad little game when facts slap you in the face, you always come back with that the other person has no what so and so is.
Me? I'm not the one with the insane conspiracy theories and jumping up and down hooting about Obama being a hypocrite. I don't need to come up with anything. You're trying to advance your little scary stories and failing miserably at it. Whether or not you continue to believe them really doesn't worry me. I'm not under the delusion that I can heal the mentally ill via the internet.
I've been dumpster diving into old threads and I finally figured out the Soros reference! It was Vader582 from this thread:
Right, so your only tactic is to redefine terms incorrectly to fit your narrative and to accuse people of having alternate accounts.
I'm pretty sure that Karl Marx was an economist that critiqued and described the conflicts of capitalism and that communism has something to do with a classless society and something about who owns the means of production(hint: it isn't capital), which is the exact opposite of how you're "defining" Marxism as a fascist plutocracy ruled by capital. I mean seriously, this is pretty basic political science here.
ing rocker.
So now you have to backtrack and try t0 define your terms better. That is an improvement but I will start answering you when you actually read my posts and you take away more than just a "Soros" reference which proves how childish you really are and somehow that automatically disqualifies someone.I'm pretty sure that Karl Marx was an economist that critiqued and described the conflicts of capitalism and that communism has something to do with a classless society and something about who owns the means of production(hint: it isn't capital), which is the exact opposite of how you're "defining" Marxism as a fascist plutocracy ruled by capital. I mean seriously, this is pretty basic political science here.
If I'm wrong, then prove it. Let's see some citations unless you think every form of media has a liberal bias. At that rate, you're just completely off your
Shhhhh...Doh, your laughter will creep Msutt out.AHHAHAHAAHHA...holy shit. There have been some real knuckleheads on this forum, but it seems like you're seriously running to be head of that class. Are you going to tell us about the Trilateral Commission and the Illuminati next? Don't forget about Bilderberg and the Stonecutters!
The only thing to be taken from your posts is that it's bad performance art. If you're going to troll, at least try to do it well.
Oh man there was a Bilderberg reference! Bravo troll.AHHAHAHAAHHA...holy shit. There have been some real knuckleheads on this forum, but it seems like you're seriously running to be head of that class. Are you going to tell us about the Trilateral Commission and the Illuminati next? Don't forget about Bilderberg and the Stonecutters!
The only thing to be taken from your posts is that it's bad performance art. If you're going to troll, at least try to do it well.
