I would suggest not doing another live show. Well the show was okay and the bad parts were no fault of wombat or cheapy, just the people that called in were Fucking terrible.
there was the guy with the bad mike
the guy that wanted to talk about the hype wagon 40 minutes after it past
the guy...
I love cheap ass gamer because every post so far has been a nice honest anwser, I put this also on gamespot as a experiment to see once and for all which one is the better board and the post on the gamespot version of this thread are like it "dude halo 0wns joo mom!!11!!11"
yes would be wonderful if all games were judged on there own merits, but theres always somthing like it not as good as this or better than that.
I think its PLAY magazine that actually prides it self on telling you that this game is not as good as this game over here , agin I think its PLAY...
well yeah of course GTA, Halo, zelda, every world war 2 frist person shooter
the argument for gta is that they added more places to see and things to do
which can be applyed to almost anything really
thats actually what I was trying to get at does the first game get a better score just because you have not played 10 of them before
and for the sake of arugment lets say all of them cost the same, and yes of course $60 space invaders deserves to be smashed on sight.
You know how some reviews say things like "its more of the same" or "you've played this game thousand times before" and the game gets a lower the score because of it. What I was thinking is that the new game should not get a lower score than the frist one just because it's just like the first...
You know how some reviews say things like "its more of the same" or "you've played this game thousand times before" and the game gets a lower the score because of it. What I was thinking is that the new game should not get a lower score than the frist one just because it's just like the first...