A Glimpse Into The Psyche Of Obama/Biden Supporters...

RAMSTORIA

RAMSTORIA

CAGiversary!
Feedback
34 (100%)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5p3OB6roAg


Howard Stern had one of his cronies go around Harlem asking people if they supported Obama or McCain. No surprise that Obama was the most popular answer. He then asked if they agreed with Obama's policy, but gave them things that McCain supports. They all said they supported those policies. Pretty funny stuff. (The same thing happened when someone said they support McCain).
 
There's no denying that the majority of the electorate on both sides is clueless.

And it's probably the worst in poor, rural conservative areas and poor, urban liberal areas.
 
The only difference in this year's election is that the hackneyed Democrat mantra has been successfully repackaged as "Change."
 
Oh, I get it. This is like that other thread with all the stupid racist people, but about Obama instead. And without the stupid racist people. Gotcha.
 
[quote name='Kirin Lemon']Oh, I get it. This is like that other thread with all the stupid racist people, but about Obama instead. And without the stupid racist people. Gotcha.[/quote]

Racism doesn't have to involve hate, just FYI.
 
This is as stupid as claiming Sarah Palin actually represents conservative thought or just thought in general.
 
[quote name='Kirin Lemon']Oh, I get it. This is like that other thread with all the stupid racist people, but about Obama instead. And without the stupid racist people. Gotcha.[/QUOTE]

Oh yeah. I knew something was diferent: nobody yelling for a candidates decapitation.
 
Okay, like all my other posts here, lemme say that I'm not voting for either of these two idiots. I believe the Republocrats have destroyed this country. But these were too hilarious (and slightly sad). There is one thing Obama has done that amazes me: he's built the world's biggest cult of personality around himself. I'm not criticizing the man, but the cult-like status he's received in some circles. Anyway, enjoy:

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/oct/18/owner-believes-lexus-vandalized-due-mccain-sticker/

By DAVE NICHOLSON | The Tampa Tribune
Published: October 18, 2008
Clearwater - CLEARWATER Frank Armstrong was preparing to go for a jog this morning when he noticed his Lexus – adorned with a McCain-Palin sticker - had been vandalized with obscenities and a burned American flag.
Armstrong discovered the damage to his 2006 Lexus about 8:30 a.m. at his Sand Key condominium at 1400 Gulf Blvd. Clearwater police and Armstrong said someone etched obscenities and "KKK" into the paint, burned several areas of the car with cigarettes, set the flag on fire on his hood and may have urinated on the vehicle. Officers and Armstrong think the car was singled out because of its political stickers, including one reading "Nobama."
"This is definitely a hate crime," said Armstrong, a 41-year-old physician.
Police estimated damage at $4,500. Police classified the incident as "criminal mischief/hate crime" and said it appeared "to be politically/racially motivated because the victim affixed a bumper sticker supporting the McCain campaign as well as an anti-Obama bumper sticker."
Click to expand...

And here is another one (that I won't cut and paste, way too long) I saw on Digg a few days ago.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-supporter-assaults-female-mccain-volunteer-in-new-york/2/

And finally, this lovely little image.....

obamavotive.jpg
 
i still don't think this is worse than the treason and kill the terrorist shouts at the McCain Palin rallies.. without either one of them telling those people that they are wrong in what they shout.
 
[quote name='DJSteel']i still don't think this is worse than the treason and kill the terrorist shouts at the McCain Palin rallies.. without either one of them telling those people that they are wrong in what they shout.[/quote]
Agreed i havent heard anybody shouting to kill McCain or McCain is a terrorist.
 
[quote name='DJSteel']i still don't think this is worse than the treason and kill the terrorist shouts at the McCain Palin rallies.. without either one of them telling those people that they are wrong in what they shout.[/quote]

While we could argue that (which btw, the secret service believes is unfounded), my comments are more about the cult-like status that people attribute to Obama, which is why he generally receives a free pass in the media and other political circles.
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki']While we could argue that (which btw, the secret service believes is unfounded), my comments are more about the cult-like status that people attribute to Obama, which is why he generally receives a free pass in the media and other political circles.[/QUOTE]

how is that?? Have you watched Fox News lately?? In the right wing media Obama gets killed.. if Left wing, McCain gets killed.. neither one gets a free pass..
 
[quote name='DJSteel']how is that?? Have you watched Fox News lately?? In the right wing media Obama gets killed.. if Left wing, McCain gets killed.. neither one gets a free pass..[/quote]

The operative word in my statement is 'generally.' And while Fox News, Washington Times and the NY Post generally favor McCain, Obama receive more positive press than negative, something McCain probably can't say.
 
I bet there's more to the story with the guy hitting the lady. He never should have done it in a million years but I highly doubt he wasn't being overly antagonized. She should have walked away when he started grabbing the sign from her, realizing he was nuts. But no, she pulls out another sign. Which she has the right to do. But you also have the right to wear steaks around your neck and go to sleep in bear infested woods. Sometimes you need to shut your mouth and walk away.
 
[quote name='HowStern']I bet there's more to the story with the guy hitting the lady. He never should have done it in a million years but I highly doubt he wasn't being overly antagonized. She should have walked away when he started grabbing the sign from her, realizing he was nuts. But no, she pulls out another sign. Which she has the right to do. But you also have the right to wear steaks around your neck and go to sleep in bear infested woods. Sometimes you need to shut your mouth and walk away.[/quote]

Sorry, I call foul on that assessment too. This is supposed to be a nation where the rule of law applies. You're blaming the victim for getting beat up. By your own assessment, the aggressor should have walked away, but rather decided to pursue the matter by beating a woman in a crowd area with a wooden stick.
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki']While we could argue that (which btw, the secret service believes is unfounded), my comments are more about the cult-like status that people attribute to Obama, which is why he generally receives a free pass in the media and other political circles.[/QUOTE]

The Secret Service investigated one rally and think no one shouted "kill him" that rally btw was not the one where there is a youtube video of someone shouting "kill him" but a different rally.

And yes Obama is often attributed a "cult-like status" by total jackoffs who have nothing better to say or do.

As for your last statement all I have to say is crack is whack.
 
[quote name='Msut77']
And yes Obama is often attributed a "cult-like status" by total jackoffs who have nothing better to say or do.
[/quote]

Are you implying that I'm a total jackoff??? :cry: And here I thought we were all friends on the Controversy board ;)
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki']Are you implying that I'm a total jackoff??? :cry: And here I thought we were all friends on the Controversy board ;)[/QUOTE]

I am pretty sure I hate you, almost as much as the other jackoffs that cannot type four syllables without throwing in a charge of socialism.
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki'] There is one thing Obama has done that amazes me: he's built the world's biggest cult of personality around himself. I'm not criticizing the man, but the cult-like status he's received in some circles.[/quote]
I don't think it holds a candle to the cult of personality fawning over Bush during the 2004 election. Obama's hard core crowd is definitely ready to crown him prince of America, but George was damn near the second coming of Christ there for a bit.

I love the Obama candles. Hilarious.
 
[quote name='speedracer']I don't think it holds a candle to the cult of personality fawning over Bush during the 2004 election. Obama's hard core crowd is definitely ready to crown him prince of America, but George was damn near the second coming of Christ there for a bit.

I love the Obama candles. Hilarious.[/quote]
Dont forget the Cult of Sarah Palin.
 
[quote name='speedracer']I don't think it holds a candle to the cult of personality fawning over Bush during the 2004 election. Obama's hard core crowd is definitely ready to crown him prince of America, but George was damn near the second coming of Christ there for a bit...[/QUOTE]

Herein lies the problem for McCain. No one wants to anoint the "wanabe" conservative named McCain. Anyone making the claim knows they're lying to themselves.

He's only getting the conservative vote for lack of a real candidate, while Democrats blow their wad on a savior every four years. If Republicans had any backbone and nominated a real conservative, there wouldn't even be a contest since Obama is just John Kerry with a tan.


Speaking of John Kerry and the psyche of Obama voters, he likes to make jokes at McCain's expense:

http://www.politickerma.com/jeremyj...-he-goes-commando-and-mccain-would-say-depend

No, Democrats never use crude or inflamatory remarks to portray their opponents. They're as squeaky clean as a Catholic virgin.
 
[quote name='bmulligan']Herein lies the problem for McCain. No one wants to anoint the "wanabe" conservative named McCain. Anyone making the claim knows they're lying to themselves.

He's only getting the conservative vote for lack of a real candidate, while Democrats blow their wad on a savior every four years. If Republicans had any backbone and nominated a real conservative, there wouldn't even be a contest since Obama is just John Kerry with a tan.


Speaking of John Kerry and the psyche of Obama voters, he likes to make jokes at McCain's expense:

http://www.politickerma.com/jeremyj...-he-goes-commando-and-mccain-would-say-depend

No, Democrats never use crude or inflamatory remarks to portray their opponents. They're as squeaky clean as a Catholic virgin.[/QUOTE]

I can say the same about McCain/Palin and the whole William Ayers angle... safe to say David Letterman showed McCain a thing or two...
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki']Sorry, I call foul on that assessment too. This is supposed to be a nation where the rule of law applies. You're blaming the victim for getting beat up. By your own assessment, the aggressor should have walked away, but rather decided to pursue the matter by beating a woman in a crowd area with a wooden stick.[/quote]

I agree, but it's a grey area because the man is obviously not okay in the head. In todays society you can't go around egging people on. People shoot each other over less. By all means, he was wrong and she should be able to hold up as many signs as she wants but when the fire is getting bigger in front of you and you keep throwing gasoline in it..

edit: I just thought of a good analogy. It's sort of like letting your kids go swimming at a priests house. Legally, well we know the law...but...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='DJSteel']I can say the same about McCain/Palin and the whole William Ayers angle... safe to say David Letterman showed McCain a thing or two...[/QUOTE]

Which revealed the real reason MCain is not a good candidate, but not for the reason you think.

When Letterman asked him about his association with G. Liddy, McCain sisn't even see it coming and couldd not come up with a valid response and looked like an unprepared dufus. Honestly, you'd think that a Republican campaign think-tank that's determining Obama terrorist strategy would have researched MCain's associations and come up with a pre-recorded response to such accusations. We're supposed to "trust" McCain to surround himself with good advisers becuase he's a self-admitted dunce and they can't even properly prepare strategy.

The real answer to the Liddy question in comparison to the Ayers association is the nature of the associations. Meaning, MCain's link to Liddy is a peer relationship while Ayers-Obama relationship could be one of power and owed favors. If Ayers is responsible for Obama's foothold into Chicago local politics, Obama and will be expected to repay such debt. I don't see how Lidddy is, or was, in any similar position of power over McCain. This is the question and is not even being proposed by the McCain campaign, which leads me to believe they are just as moronic as the candidate himself.
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki']why can't there be an adequate third party candidate [/QUOTE]
Because you touch yourself. :D

And because no matter who runs, there will be a segment that doesn't like any of them. We could have 100 viable candidates and then people would complain that it's overload. There were what, 8 Dem candidates and 7 Repub candidates? The range on them was to put it mildly, wide. Slap a different tag on 2 or 3 more people, toss em in the general election, and the complaint would be the same.

Oh wait, we already do that. But like you said, you don't like Barr.

The difference between potentials was pretty friggin wide this year. Any contest that has Romney and Paul, Hillary and Kucinich, and host of others is pretty friggin diverse.

What exactly would address your concern here? It seems to me that people are complaining that there's not more candidates EXACTLY LIKE THEM. Well, if that's the case, then they need to run.
 
[quote name='speedracer']

The difference between potentials was pretty friggin wide this year. Any contest that has Romney and Paul, Hillary and Kucinich, and host of others is pretty friggin diverse.

What exactly would address your concern here? It seems to me that people are complaining that there's not more candidates EXACTLY LIKE THEM. Well, if that's the case, then they need to run.[/quote]

I hardly call this election diverse. Other than Paul, Kucinich and Gravel, there really isn't much noteworthy difference between the primary candidates respective to the two parties.

Nor do I want someone exactly like me. I not unwilling to vote Democrat (which I've done before) or Republican (which I've also done before) when the person is undoubtedly qualified. Hell, I even thought Slick Willie was qualified within reason ('cept that whole NAFTA thing, but that's not the point here). Unfortunately, there are just too many sour notes for either candidate to be listed as "undoubtedly qualified." And God help us all if either one of the Veeps had to step up to the presidency (Biden I probably could tolerate, but Palin, really?).
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki']I hardly call this election diverse. Other than Paul, Kucinich and Gravel, there really isn't much noteworthy difference between the primary candidates for the respective to the two parties.[/quote]
What is it you would like to see more of from the candidates? What is the difference between them that would cause you to perceive as different?

Unfortunately, there are just too many sour notes for either candidate to be listed as "undoubtedly qualified."
Click to expand...
Problem is, no one could ever be undoubtedly qualified for the job. It's just not the nature of the job.
 
[quote name='speedracer']Because you touch yourself. :D
[/quote]

And dag-nabit, first killing dinosaurs, now this!?!?!? What's next, getting blamed for global warming? :lol:

[quote name='speedracer']
Problem is, no one could ever be undoubtedly qualified for the job. It's just not the nature of the job.[/quote]

I'll concede to you on this one.
 
[quote name='thrustbucket']My complaint is that Ron Paul isn't exactly running. Or anyone much like him, that I know of.[/QUOTE]

Funny how his outlandish claims of the perils of an uncontrolled, 3d party money supply aren't so "Looney" or "Certifiable" anymore, yet you'd still be hard pressed to find anyone to admit that. It's too bad the american people only understand "depression" and "bail-out" after it's too late.
 
[quote name='plasticbathmonki']What's next, getting blamed for global warming?


[/QUOTE]


ejaculation procduces more co2 than a cross country flight
 
[quote name='RAMSTORIA']ejaculation procduces more co2 than a cross country flight[/quote]
Good thing I spent my whole allowance on carbon credits. :joystick:
 
[quote name='DarkSageRK']Racism doesn't have to involve hate, just FYI.[/QUOTE]

To imply that uninformed voters who happen to support Obama and be black are racist is pretty absurd.

There are plenty uninformed voters of all races on both sides of this election, as always.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top