All Lawyers Should Be Hung: But We'll Start With These Morons

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
Victims Sue Thailand, U.S., Accor Over Tsunami

Mon Mar 7, 9:20 AM ET

 World - Reuters

VIENNA (Reuters) - U.S. and Austrian lawyers have filed a lawsuit demanding Thailand, U.S. forecasters and the French Accor group answer accusations they failed in a duty to warn populations hit by December's Tsunami disaster, a lawyer said Monday.

The lawsuit was filed Friday at a New York district court on behalf of tsunami victims by lawyers including U.S. attorney Edward Fagan, internationally renowned for 1990s lawsuits against Swiss banks over Holocaust-era accounts. It demanded an account of their actions on Dec. 26.

"We expect a hearing within 30 days," Austrian lawyer Gerhard Podovsovnik told Reuters.

"We don't earn any money on the lawsuit. We want to help people," he said. "We are suing to get information."

The disaster left about 300,000 people dead or missing in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, India, Thailand, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Maldives, Bangladesh and East Africa. Hundreds of thousands lost their homes.

The text of the lawsuit is available on the Web site www.tsunamivictimsgroup.com.

The U.S. and Austrian lawyers filed the lawsuit on behalf of around 60 named plaintiffs from Austria, Germany, France, Netherlands and elsewhere. Podovsovnik said they were also acting on behalf of at least 40 more not named.

The lawsuit suggests the Thai government and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which operates a Tsunami Warning Center in Hawaii, failed to issue the requisite warnings.

SLOW WARNINGS

"Respondent NOAA did not notify all involved countries which lay in the tsunami's path. From public information it appears that ... NOAA failed to issue an alert that would notify countries where the tsunami hit that the deadly wave was coming," the lawsuit said.

"Published reports emerged that upon receipt of the NOAA alert and other data, the seismological and oceanographic experts of Thailand spent more than one hour talking about what the risk may or may not have been, instead of immediately issuing a warning to their population," it said.

It also accused Thailand of failing to notify Sri Lanka that a tsunami wave was headed its way.

Among the charges leveled against Accor, the owner of the Sofitel hotel chain, was failure to equip its luxury resort and spa in Khao Lak, Thailand with state-of-the-art seismic detection and warning systems, despite its location "in an earthquake and tsunami fault zone."

Last month, Accor issued a statement denying media reports of possible negligence in connection with the tsunami disaster. "The allegations concerning Accor are completely unfounded," Accor said on its Web Site.

Exihibit A on Lawyer Murder Trial
 
"We are suing to get information."..........

The lawsuit suggests the Thai government and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which operates a Tsunami Warning Center in Hawaii, failed to issue the requisite warnings.........

"Published reports emerged that upon receipt of the NOAA alert and other data, the seismological and oceanographic experts of Thailand spent more than one hour talking about what the risk may or may not have been, instead of immediately issuing a warning to their population," it said.


I think I'm missing the problem

Oh ya, and the "all lawyers should be hung" part, how exactly would that work? How well does that average person know the law, let alone a poor uneducated person, or an immigrant?
 
Remember...alonzomourning23...information is "bad" according to this administration. Look what they have done to hide other information.

Not a big deal IMO expect PaD gets an excuse to bash conservatives favorite whipping boys..Lawyers. That is until they want to sue.

The hypocrisy of the right on the issue of lawyers is just like everything else.

Stem cells
the Environment
Gays
Taxes


they hate the idea until they need it.
 
WTF are you guys talking about? Do you have to turn EVERY issue into a partisan argument? What the hell does this administration have to do with the NOAA Warning Center?

These lawyers sound like jerks to me. The scientists feel bad enough already (I have read interviews) and I'm sure they won't make the same mistake again.
 
[quote name='Backlash']WTF are you guys talking about? Do you have to turn EVERY issue into a partisan argument? What the hell does this administration have to do with the NOAA Warning Center?

[/quote]

What part of "vs." don't you understand...;)

You're right. I overstepped at bit. But after being called 'stupid', a 'tard', 'short bus rider' etc. from PaD (and his parrot Scurb). I tend to be a little defensive.
 
WTF are you guys talking about? Do you have to turn EVERY issue into a partisan argument?

Yes, but that's what the radicals on this board do so I am not surprised.

Anway, These countries should get their own warning system so they can sue them. That's what the US gets for doing the people of the world favors.
 
I'd file this with the story about how they're going to start issuing weathermen a fine iin DC if they mis-forecast a snowstorm.

It's regulatory BS that's just going to serve to both

A) Drive up the cost of forecasting storms (IE you'll need "forecaster insurance")

B) Drive business and competition out of the forecasting industry.
 
[quote name='Scrubking']
WTF are you guys talking about? Do you have to turn EVERY issue into a partisan argument?

Yes, but that's what the radicals on this board do so I am not surprised.
[/quote]

You do the exact same thing.

[quote name='Scrubking']
Anway, These countries should get their own warning system so they can sue them. That's what the US gets for doing the people of the world favors.[/quote]

Nice.
 
[quote name='Backlash'][quote name='Scrubking']
WTF are you guys talking about? Do you have to turn EVERY issue into a partisan argument?

Yes, but that's what the radicals on this board do so I am not surprised.
[/quote]

You do the exact same thing.[/quote]

:roll:
 
[quote name='camoor']I'd file this with the story about how they're going to start issuing weathermen a fine iin DC if they mis-forecast a snowstorm.

It's regulatory BS that's just going to serve to both

A) Drive up the cost of forecasting storms (IE you'll need "forecaster insurance")

B) Drive business and competition out of the forecasting industry.[/quote]

If forcasting tsunamis were like forcasting rain on Tues. you might have a point....but it isn't.

Besides the issues is warning NOT forecasting.

if anything, the suit seems to be premature as NOAA might very well have it's own investigation underway.
 
Agreed. An investigation is the more appropriate response, funded by NOAA and reviewed by a science panel in order to prevent future disasters. A lawsuit is simply a media circus that accomplishes nothing except to run Tsunami footage on the news for another month.
 
bread's done
Back
Top