[quote name='icruise'][quote name='starman9000']
Just cause someone doesnt agree with you doesnt make them uniformed. And just cause someone is 'informed' doesnt mean they will do things that you consider right.[/quote]
Very well put. A lot of people seem to think that if only the other side knew "the truth" they would naturally change their minds. They think if someone disagrees with them, they must be stupid, uninformed, or basing all their decisions on emotion. I hate to break it to you, but there isn't only one "right" answer, and two people can be very well informed and very intelligent and still disagree.[/quote]
Sometimes there is only one right answer. Hitler was right to try to annihilate the Jews - right or wrong?
I agree with what is spoken above about informed, etc. as well. However, being informed does raise the likelihood that a person will make better decisions. Come on, we all play video games. We all know the guy with the strategy guide who is "informed" is more likely to finish a game before someone else (Yes, somebody else might find a "better" way, but it is much less likely).
No, you shouldn't hold someone's ignorance against them, but don't downplay the value of being informed. After all, for all you Bush-haters out there, do you think the country is better or worse off for being informed about the WMD issue? Or maybe it would be better if nobody were informed on the issue...