Break-ups are hard to do....

I think I'm glad I waited for the responses before viewing it, now I know not to.

Though this reminds me of a college that had a pornography class, where you learned about the porn industry (and it had guest speakers). At the end of the year you could either do a paper or direct a porno (with you or someone else) or do a live performance. I wish my school had that class.
 
Internal Server Error

Someone wanna summarize it for me?

Edit: WTF Mate? Now it's working...

Wow.
 
i dont want to watch the video, but can someone explain to me what happened during the it?
 
[quote name='2poor']i dont want to watch the video, but can someone explain to me what happened during the it?[/QUOTE]

A man and woman hug each other outside of an elevator door. The young woman walks into an elevator. (Meaning: They just broke up.) He pulls out a gun, puts it in his mouth, and pulls the trigger. He then hits the floor. Also, he kind of rolls a bit after he has laid there for a few seconds.
 
[quote name='2poor']i dont want to watch the video, but can someone explain to me what happened during the it?[/QUOTE]

It shows a guy and a girl hug and kiss, then the girl gets on the elevator. The guy pulls out a gun and kills himself.
 
Why the hell do people want to watch people die? Seriously, get help.

And also, for the OP, put what the hell it is in the original post. You made it sound like something sexual (I almost watched it, turned back when I realized it was a video). People shouldn't be tricked into watching someone die. I hate when people do that, post some disgusting and disturbing shit and don't bother to mention what it actually is you'll be watching.
 
which viedo where the kid falls out the car and dies? that one from the back seat like into another parked car? if not which?

Also, you dont think that shit looks real? have you ever seen a person die in real life not on tv or anythibg? i doubt it, i have, that shit is real. i dont know if you expected like he head to pop off and blood to spray everywhere, its not kill bill...
 
[quote name='D4rkN1ght']which viedo where the kid falls out the car and dies? that one from the back seat like into another parked car? if not which?

Also, you dont think that shit looks real? have you ever seen a person die in real life not on tv or anythibg? i doubt it, i have, that shit is real. i dont know if you expected like he head to pop off and blood to spray everywhere, its not kill bill...[/QUOTE]

I've seen people get killed, but it was informative. I think we've all seen the south vietnamese troops shoot the captured north vietnamese soldier (I think that's what he was) in the head after getting the info they wanted, the monks going up in flames, nazi killing jews etc. And I was watching worldlink show a documentary about guerilla fighters in indonesia (I believe, I know it was in that area), and they showed a video where they had captives read out a note and then cut off their heads, showing one of the severed heads rolling through the grass.

One is being watched for information, is not sought out intentionally (at least it wasn't on my part), and is not made into a joke or a freakshow. This is just for fun, is 100% unexpected, and has no informative value whatsoever.
 
That was horrifying. I kind of realized what would happen after the elevator doors closed and I covered the screen. Meh. Sad.
 
Note to self: Don't click on any strange links.
I closed the window right when he put the gun in his mouth. Why the hell would anyone post this?
 
I agree with Sartori. When you see a warning that says "Not safe for work" "Not kid friendly" and "over 18 only," what do you think you're going to see a video of someone frollicking through a field of daisies?

Also it was pretty easy to discern what was going to happen by the title of the post and the message before the link.

You guys probably had heart attacks during the whole "link them to goatse!" And please, for the love of God, if you don't know what goatse is, DO NOT GOOGLE IT. IT IS NOT PLEASANT. AT ALL.

....chances are, someone's going to complain about that too.
 
That is very sad. Hopefully that video will get off most of the internet quickly so his family won't have to deal with it much longer. No one deserves to have their death be made a spectacle of.
 
:(

[quote name='Sartori']I must be quite desensitized.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, being online for nearly a decade, it feels like I've seen everything imaginable. Though I guess I'm not too far gone since the thought of death still leaves me melancholy; I'm not so much shocked by them, but saddened.

[quote name='Renegade_Zero']dude that looked pretty real he fell reall hard, but how'd he turn over like that at the end/.[/QUOTE]

The end of the video is slowed down significantly once he hits the ground, so he's not actually rolling for that long.
 
[quote name='ratedpeej']I agree with Sartori. When you see a warning that says "Not safe for work" "Not kid friendly" and "over 18 only," what do you think you're going to see a video of someone frollicking through a field of daisies?

Also it was pretty easy to discern what was going to happen by the title of the post and the message before the link.

You guys probably had heart attacks during the whole "link them to goatse!" And please, for the love of God, if you don't know what goatse is, DO NOT GOOGLE IT. IT IS NOT PLEASANT. AT ALL.

....chances are, someone's going to complain about that too.[/QUOTE]


I like you man. I like you.
 
[quote name='ratedpeej']I agree with Sartori. When you see a warning that says "Not safe for work" "Not kid friendly" and "over 18 only," what do you think you're going to see a video of someone frollicking through a field of daisies?

Also it was pretty easy to discern what was going to happen by the title of the post and the message before the link.

You guys probably had heart attacks during the whole "link them to goatse!" And please, for the love of God, if you don't know what goatse is, DO NOT GOOGLE IT. IT IS NOT PLEASANT. AT ALL.

....chances are, someone's going to complain about that too.[/QUOTE]

Not safe for work, not kid friendly, and especially the "over 18 only" made it sound sexual. No where, and for no reason, would I assume someone was going to die. Proper warning would be "graphic violence", suicide, gunshot, death etc. something signifying violence or death.

The only other thing that came to mind was a guy getting beat up by his ex girlfriend.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']Not safe for work, not kid friendly, and especially the "over 18 only" made it sound sexual. No where, and for no reason, would I assume someone was going to die. Proper warning would be "graphic violence", suicide, gunshot, death etc. something signifying violence or death.

The only other thing that came to mind was a guy getting beat up by his ex girlfriend.[/QUOTE]

Well, just because you think it's sexually inclined doesn't mean it can ONLY mean that. I think the warning was enough. It fits. It wasn't something that you should be viewing at work. It wasn't something that kids should be viewing (they see enough of that in TV). It was definitely something to be viewed by those 'over 18'. If there's anyone or anything to blame, blame your curiosity. No one forced you to click the link and the warnings were there to shoo anyone who couldn't qualify under the guidelines.
 
[quote name='jaykrue']Well, just because you think it's sexually inclined doesn't mean it can ONLY mean that. I think the warning was enough. It fits. It wasn't something that you should be viewing at work. It wasn't something that kids should be viewing (they see enough of that in TV). It was definitely something to be viewed by those 'over 18'. If there's anyone or anything to blame, blame your curiosity. No one forced you to click the link and the warnings were there to shoo anyone who couldn't qualify under the guidelines.[/QUOTE]

I didn't actually watch it, I clicked it and was going to but felt the video was too risky (thought it was sexually explicit but wasn't certain). But it may fit other things, and for something as graphic as a person dying it shouldn't be an ambiguous warning. The only good thing is he didn't post unavoidable pics in the post (which many have done).

I don't really care when people post these things (as long as they weren't the original source), but it bothers me when there is no warning, or the warning is unclear and doesn't sound like it actually is. It often seems like they give a warning just to be able to say they warned you, but at the same time are trying to shock you as well.

If you're going to show someone get killed, be considerate enough to give a clear warning, not one that could easily be misinterpereted to mean something entirely different.
 
I only had a hard time once with a break up, and I got drunk for about 2 months to get over it :lol:

I was with her for a few years, which is why it was so rough.

At least I can laugh about it now ... otherwise I was never heart broken and moved on pretty quickly.

By the way the guy in the video is a fucking retard.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']I don't really care when people post these things (as long as they weren't the original source), but it bothers me when there is no warning, or the warning is unclear and doesn't sound like it actually is. It often seems like they give a warning just to be able to say they warned you, but at the same time are trying to shock you as well.[/quote]
there was a warning in the very first post of the thread. you might've missed it. it was pretty clear, too. and warnings are put in place to let you know that there may be shocking material, while at the same time, telling you that you've been warned about what you're going to/not going to see. it doesn't get any simpler than that.

If you're going to show someone get killed, be considerate enough to give a clear warning, not one that could easily be misinterpereted to mean something entirely different.
Click to expand...
you still don't get it...

Well, just because you think it's sexually inclined doesn't mean it can ONLY mean that.
Click to expand...

without going into exact specifics, the warning was clear enough. i don't know what else you would want from a warning other than being... omg... warned that it's not appropriate for this and that, and so and so. just because you continue to think that it was something that it didn't turn out to be, doesn't mean the warning given doesn't still apply.
 
[quote name='ZR0 Limit']there was a warning in the very first post of the thread. you might've missed it. it was pretty clear, too. and warnings are put in place to let you know that there may be shocking material, while at the same time, telling you that you've been warned about what you're going to/not going to see. it doesn't get any simpler than that.


you still don't get it...



without going into exact specifics, the warning was clear enough. i don't know what else you would want from a warning other than being... omg... warned that it's not appropriate for this and that, and so and so. just because you continue to think that it was something that it didn't turn out to be, doesn't mean the warning given doesn't still apply.[/QUOTE]

Maybe from now on people need to draw up some schematics or post it on a fucking billboard. :lol:
 
[quote name='ZR0 Limit']there was a warning in the very first post of the thread. you might've missed it. it was pretty clear, too. and warnings are put in place to let you know that there may be shocking material, while at the same time, telling you that you've been warned about what you're going to/not going to see. it doesn't get any simpler than that.


you still don't get it...



without going into exact specifics, the warning was clear enough. i don't know what else you would want from a warning other than being... omg... warned that it's not appropriate for this and that, and so and so. just because you continue to think that it was something that it didn't turn out to be, doesn't mean the warning given doesn't still apply.[/QUOTE]

I didn't say it didn't apply, I said it wasn't good. When I go to a porn site I get a warning stating that there will be sexually explicit content, when I watch a violent movie or program I'm warned that there will be graphic violence, when I see a "faces of death" commercial I'm warned that there will be depictions of extreme violence and death. When I watch tv shows, there's warnings about the content. If someone posted the image from goatse on here and just had a warning that said "not safe for work, not for children, must be over 18", that's not very clear. A blanket warning that could mean anything isn't much of a warning.
 
This was really fucking sick. It shouldn't have been posted in the first place, despite the warning.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']If someone posted the image from goatse on here and just had a warning that said "not safe for work, not for children, must be over 18", that's not very clear.[/QUOTE]
what's not clear about goatse being "not safe for work, not for children, and must be over 18"? is it the "not safe for work" part, or the "not for children" section?

sure, the warning that was given isn't as fancy as the ones you're used to seeing, but i still fail to see the problem of it doing it's job. it's flat-out telling you that you shouldn't be looking at it. if you can't assume that there's going to be something messed up that ain't quite good in the link, then i'm sure there are plenty of caves with broadband access where you can set up shop, that's free from a non-specific warning society. god forbid anyone mistakes the skull and crossbones as a sign of impending happiness.

but if you seriously want a warning, here:

*WARNING* ZOMG! GUY BEING PWNED BY HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND AND THEN HIS GUN! PWNED = TEH DEAD!!!1ONE LOLZWTFBBQ!! *WARNING*

and remember everyone, there's also the "report post" button. it reports posts. you know, for posts that contain videos just like the one in this thread. if you don't think it's appropriate here, then click it and notify the mods to delete it. not a hard concept. you might also try suggesting a seperate sub-forum for things just like these. and heck, maybe it'll have a clear and precise warning on it, too.
 
I agree with alonzo on the warning thing... A picture of a pair of boobs is NSFW, not kid friendly, and over 18 only. There's a huge difference between mild nudity and graphic, real violence, IMHO.
 
While it's kinda redundant, JM gave everyone ample warning. I also expected it to be something sexual, but that was more from the comments people who didn't watch it said. He said explicitly that it's not kid friendly, so you've got no reason to whine.

That being said, I think it's pretty sick, and seems kinda disrespectful to the family and the guy.
 
[quote name='ZR0 Limit']without going into exact specifics, the warning was clear enough. i don't know what else you would want from a warning other than being... omg... warned that it's not appropriate for this and that, and so and so. just because you continue to think that it was something that it didn't turn out to be, doesn't mean the warning given doesn't still apply.[/QUOTE]

Uh, you missed the point of my post. I just said that. I know the warning was clear enough. I wasn't refuting that the warning was enough. I was clarifying that exact point to alonzo - I don't know why you had to tell me. Speaking to the choir.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']I didn't say it didn't apply, I said it wasn't good. When I go to a porn site I get a warning stating that there will be sexually explicit content, when I watch a violent movie or program I'm warned that there will be graphic violence, when I see a "faces of death" commercial I'm warned that there will be depictions of extreme violence and death. When I watch tv shows, there's warnings about the content. If someone posted the image from goatse on here and just had a warning that said "not safe for work, not for children, must be over 18", that's not very clear. A blanket warning that could mean anything isn't much of a warning.[/QUOTE]

Still, my point stands that whatever image, movie, motion picture, media it was going to show, it STILL qualifies as set forth in the warnings. To reiterate, blame your own curiosity (this goes to everyone bitching about not being given any warning) if you saw it and got angry about what you saw. You have a hand. It controls the mouse. All you have to do is resist the urge to click. It's not hard physical manual labor yet it is treated as such. The argument here is irrelevant. The fact of the matter is, no matter what the content was, you all were nonetheless given ample warning.
 
[quote name='judyjudyjudy']I agree with alonzo on the warning thing... A picture of a pair of boobs is NSFW, not kid friendly, and over 18 only. There's a huge difference between mild nudity and graphic, real violence, IMHO.[/QUOTE]

That's bullshit. It aggravates me to think that people are still so uptight about nudity yet nonchalant about violence. A pair of boobs idealistically SHOULD be work safe and kid friendly unlike seeing someone blow his own brains out. I find it more appalling that the nation is more concerned about censoring Janet's boobs rather figuring out why our brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, cousins, uncles, aunts, mothers, and fathers are dying for a 'war' they may or may not necessarily support but do so anyway due to their loyalty. Sure boobs are nice to look at but the only reason why seeing such a sight is so taboo is that the US is a puritanical nation despite its claims of openmindedness. The more you hide something, the more someone will want to see it.
 
I didn't watch the Nick Berg video, and I don't plan on watching this.

That being said...

Apply the America's Funniest Home Videos principle to this situation. Who would film this particular situation, and why? And after the deed happens, does the guy drop the camera? Why would they have a tripod set up in the first place? Much like most of AFHV's videos, this one could be fake.

Edit: Just read the news article. I say "Yeah, but still" to that.
 
[quote name='evilmax17']I didn't watch the Nick Berg video, and I don't plan on watching this.

That being said...

Apply the America's Funniest Home Videos principle to this situation. Who would film this particular situation, and why? And after the deed happens, does the guy drop the camera? Why would they have a tripod set up in the first place? Much like most of AFHV's videos, this one could be fake.

Edit: Just read the news article. I say "Yeah, but still" to that.[/QUOTE]

Other things to consider:
1. A color, fairly high quality security camera? In a housing development? Put there by the NYPD? These are the guys that sodomize you with plunger handles and shoot you for taking out your wallet.

2. The wound seems really consistant with an exploding blood pack. I've only ever seen one other gunshot wound to the head, but Bud Dwyer's blood ran like a fountain.

3. Check the dates on the articles and notice what they're right around.

I'm not saying straight out that it's a hoax anymore, but are there any follow-up stories to this that stick with the story? This would just be a really good media prank.
 
I never did understand why some people commit suicide over a failed relationship. Yeah it sucks most of the time when it happens and sometimes they take alittle while to get over but lets be realistic, in the whole scheme of things its not really that big of a deal. Which reminds me of something someone once said "women are like bus stops, there is one on every corner."
 
It's pretty unfourtunate that this guy killed himself (if this is real), but I don't feel much pity or remorse. If you even think about killing yourself over a girl, and you are not stone cold drunk, your broken. Sorry, but it's true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top