[quote name='CheapyD']Yeah, I just listened to the show earlier and noticed that section. It kind of came out wrong.
I believe what I meant to say was...
Of those people considering laying down $600 for a PS3 at this time, the Xbox 360 would be their logical alternative. I think that for other than the hardcore gamer, anyone considering paying out that kind of cash for a PS3, is not going to find the Wii as an acceptable substitute.
It is just as reasonable to conclude that anyone considering purchasing a Wii, is not likely to find a PS3 as a logical alternative.
I almost don't see the Wii as even competing with the 360 or the PS3, which I think is exactly where Nintendo wants to be.
Does that make sense?[/QUOTE]
A week ago I would have pretty much agreed with this line of thinking. However, after waiting in line for over 3 hours at EB for a Wii preorder and talking to the "hardcore gamers" in line there (many of whom classified themselves as Sony and Microsoft devotees up until now and several of whom had never owned a Nintendo system before), I'm inclined to disagree. Now certainly a lot of these guys fall into the "Wii60" or "PSWii" camp, but if the Wii is the baseline and the OTHER system is the variable, Nintendo wins, no matter how you measure it. Add to that the non-traditional audience Nintendo is targeting, who would be perfectly content to own a Wii and nothing else, and its easy to see how they could become the dominant player in the marketplace.