Trancendental
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 4 (100%)
[quote name='mykevermin']If any of you, in your sexual lives, *only* engage in vaginal intercourse (i.e., 
ing, humping, knockin' boots, riding the baloney pony, etc., since this thread has become a virtual lockerroom), then you can make the argument that male and female sexual organs are complementary parts.
If you engage or even fantasize about putting it elsewhere (hand, mouth and ass being the most conventional form of non-vaginal sexual activity), then any argument about male/female "normality" is a completely useless and moot point.
So, in short, if you want to argue that male/female is "better" or "normal," then, if you want to avoid being a hypocrite, your sex life is going to be boring, boring, boring. Holding hands and three-minutes-then-to-sleep boring. So, you can either fess up and admit that, with one glaring exception, and orifice is an orifice. How could you tell if that were a man or a woman on the other side of that glory hole you've always wanted to create for yourself?[/QUOTE]
But teh Jebus hates gays!!1!
ing, humping, knockin' boots, riding the baloney pony, etc., since this thread has become a virtual lockerroom), then you can make the argument that male and female sexual organs are complementary parts.If you engage or even fantasize about putting it elsewhere (hand, mouth and ass being the most conventional form of non-vaginal sexual activity), then any argument about male/female "normality" is a completely useless and moot point.
So, in short, if you want to argue that male/female is "better" or "normal," then, if you want to avoid being a hypocrite, your sex life is going to be boring, boring, boring. Holding hands and three-minutes-then-to-sleep boring. So, you can either fess up and admit that, with one glaring exception, and orifice is an orifice. How could you tell if that were a man or a woman on the other side of that glory hole you've always wanted to create for yourself?[/QUOTE]
But teh Jebus hates gays!!1!
