Democrats Out There Supporting Illegal Acts & Aliens: What Else Is New

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
Protesters condemn governor's support of citizen border patrols
By Steve Geissinger, SACRAMENTO BUREAU

SACRAMENTO — Hundreds of chanting immigrants — joined by Democratic lawmakers — called Monday for the ouster of Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger because of his "terrible," "irresponsible" and "discriminatory" support of armed citizen patrols on the Mexico border.

"Today, we're here to fight back" against what President Bush has denounced as "vigilantes," said Assemblyman Hector De La Torre, a South Gate Democrat who was among several Southern California and San Francisco Bay Area lawmakers who addressed demonstrators outside the Capitol.

"We're here to yell and scream and stand up to the bullying that's coming out of that building," De La Torre said. "He needs to be careful about what kind of fear and what kind of anger you spread in a state as diverse as California."

With a gubernatorial election looming next year, Schwarzenegger has "become an embarrassment to our state," said Assemblyman Albert Torrico, D-Newark."He sneaks in and out of buildings through the back door because he's afraid of you, because he can't face the people," Torrico said.

"Let's show him the back door to the Capitol. Let's send him back to Hollywood," Torrico said, drawing thunderous approval from a crowd that waved signs such as, "Arnold said close the borders: Go home now."

Schwarzenegger spokesman Vince Sollitto said in an interview afterward that the governor, as an immigrant from Austria, understands the contributions that immigrants have made to California and the nation.

But the governor also "appreciates the difference between legal and illegal immigration" and the need for "public safety and homeland security."

Schwarzenegger first triggered controversy when he said California needed to close the border to control illegal immigration. After he was criticized, he apologized and said he meant government needed to do more to secure the borders.

The governor then praised the Minuteman Project, saying it reduced the flow of illegal immigrants in Arizona. He now says he didn't endorse the Minutemen but that the federal government is falling short of doing its job of securing borders.

Last questioned on the issue, Schwarzenegger sidestepped the matter by saying, "I love Mexico."

The so-called Minuteman Project involves hundreds of volunteers, some armed, who have been patrolling the Arizona border since April

1 to document and report incidents of illegal crossing. The group is planning its first California patrols near San Diego in August.

The Minutemen and governor's comments have revived the long-running debate in California over whether the costs of illegal immigration outweigh the benefits.

Schwarzenegger's supporters in the controversy, such as GOP Assemblyman Ray Haynes of Murrieta, say a federal act allows state and counties to negotiate pacts with the federal government to help enforce immigration laws. Haynes envisions a 2006 California ballot initiative to clear the way for a state border force.

"Comments by Gov. Schwarzenegger have drawn attention to immigrants' presence in a terribly negative way," said Reshma Shamasunder, director of the California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative. "Immigrants contribute in a major way to our great state."

Oakland Democratic Assemblywoman Wilma Chan said "this is a country of immigrants" so it's "very surprising there's still so much discrimination."

"We have to tell our governor we don't want vigilantes with guns standing on our borders," Chan said. "We want health care, we want decent education, we want care for our elderly. That's what we're fighting for today."

Chan's comments were aimed partially at the Democrats' deficit-spawned budget battles with Schwarzenegger, who plans to sidestep the Legislature and take several partisan issues to a special fall election ballot.

Assemblyman Mervyn Dymally,

D-Compton, who spoke during an earlier press conference held by protesters, said "Schwarzenegger supported (immigrant-rights limiting Proposition) 187. He wants vigilantes on the border. He wants to close the border."

"The governor is the biggest enemy in this state that immigrants have," Dymally said.

Link

You know, these tactics of painting a politician as "against" immigration won't work. There isn't a sizable sement of the American population on the left or right that can't discern the difference between legal and illegal immigration. That these Hispanic and Latino Democrats pretend they're the same are really just hurting their own cause.

There are few groups out there demanding a stop to all legal immigration. To be fair though it's not a modern phenomenon. We've had that forever.

I love how this is presented, that people crossing up the beaches, across rivers, stretches of desert evading the border patrol and law enforcement are just as viable an immigrant as an Indian, Vietnamese or Eastern Europeans are or have been recently that have real skills and entered legally. The racism card being played here is just such a desperate attempt by the La Raza types in a battle that is finally being joined by people outside border states and national politicians.

I could care less if our best immigrants, correction, best LEGAL immigrants are coming from El Salvador, Columbia, Brazil, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Poland or India. Immigration to me has never been about race but legality, willingness to adopt a common language and contributing to our country. Illegals show none of the above traits, even their contributions (Questionable.) don't result in taxation and frequently involve substantial payrolls leaving the country never to circulate again in the U.S. econcomy. I don't think there's one person on this board that feels illegals deserve the same social services citizens and legal alien do other than emergency medical care.

This is such a loser for any political party to support publicly or even tacitly. Too many people are finally waking up to the national security and financial costs of illegal immigration. I'm really surprised state and national chairs aren't all over these lawmakers like stink on shit.
 
Wow. A post that is neither an outright attack on democrats nor racist! I wonder if anyone who matters (read: anyone other than Quackzilla) will take this out of context...
 
You ignored the fact that illegal immigrants allows us to have many goods and service for cheap. Their services are just as vitial as the legal immigrants in our economy. I dont have to attack any goverment or deal with race but from the economic stand point they are needed.

I am sure the situation is different in other parts of the country, but thanks the work of illegal immigrants allows the cost of food and many manual labor to be avaivable for cheap.
 
[quote name='62t']You ignored the fact that illegal immigrants allows us to have many goods and service for cheap. Their services are just as vitial as the legal immigrants in our economy. I dont have to attack any goverment or deal with race but from the economic stand point they are needed.

I am sure the situation is different in other parts of the country, but thanks the work of illegal immigrants allows the cost of food and many manual labor to be avaivable for cheap.[/QUOTE]

I always see people say what you're saying. Is this cheap cost of food in comparison to other states without illegal alien problems? I don't doubt that employers can get their labor cheap, but I'm sure the money saved never makes its way to the consumer. Nor does the government get its cut, meaning we all lose out in some small way. I also don't see how this is really any different from running sweatshops on American soil. Aren't sweatshops supposed to be bad?
 
I used to work part time at a McDonald's when I was in High School. 90% of the employees were illegal. Everyone knew it, the cops that went in for burgers, the customers, and the owner. It's very easy to get into this country. The gov't puts up a front with the border patrol but they want illegals in this country.

The average middle class American doesn't like them here, but rich politicians can't get enough of them.
 
[quote name='62t']
I am sure the situation is different in other parts of the country, but thanks the work of illegal immigrants allows the cost of food and many manual labor to be avaivable for cheap.[/QUOTE]

It also allows companies like McDonalds and Walmart to thrive by keeping labor costs down, any company that can fill the majority of its positions with unskilled labor gains an advantage due to a constant influx of illigal immigrants who will work at or below minimum wage. While such a situation helps to reduce prices to the consumer it also creates a salary glut, limiting the buying power of many consumers. So just remember a vote for illegal immigration is a vote for Walmart.:D

And I think if Arnold's militia really wants to get serious they need to start placing heads atop pikes. With the situation as it is right now for anything to change either the federal government needs to actually enforce employment laws which it won't or we need a very violent mob on our hands, this pussy footing certainly isn't going to do much.
 
I think the title of this thread needs to be ammended to add Dubya's support for illegals and condemnation of vigilantes. Ya know, just to be fair.
 
[quote name='MrBadExample']I think the title of this thread needs to be ammended to add Dubya's support for illegals and condemnation of vigilantes. Ya know, just to be fair.[/QUOTE]

Seriously, the DEMOCRATS are fighting to tighten the borders, and the REPUBLICANS are fighting to keep them open.
 
personally anything that can stop the flow of illegal immigrants is a good thing. Sorry but when the Mexican Gov't. makes a flyer telling you how to cross, something is truely the matter. And hell everyone else has to wait their turn to get into the country, so why shouldn't they

and while the OP points out the democrats saying something, both parties heavily covet the Latino vote and turn the other cheek. It is one issue I wish a group united would step forward and try and put a stop to through actually having some border security.
 
And don't forget Bush posing with Vicente Fox, and supporting him.


It's a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black (for those who miss the analogy, the pot is on the fire too, and may even be more burned than the kettle).
 
Sad that PAD can't even make a decent topic without the usual misleading title. Illegal Immigration is a huge problem. The actual cost/ benefit of this illegal immigration is hard to judge and I can't say for sure if it is a net postive. The essential problem is a bad national policy. While California, can do what it wants, until the entire border is protected in a similar matter, I don't know how much good it will do.
 
[quote name='usickenme']Sad that PAD can't even make a decent topic without the usual misleading title. Illegal Immigration is a huge problem. The actual cost/ benefit of this illegal immigration is hard to judge and I can't say for sure if it is a net postive. The essential problem is a bad national policy. While California, can do what it wants, until the entire border is protected in a similar matter, I don't know how much good it will do.[/QUOTE]

Yes, misleading title. Because it was obviously a reporter that mistakenly labled these Democrats Democrats. We all know that they MUST be Republican.

Hey, I'm not even going to touch Bush's stance on this. It's disgraceful pure and simple. Both parties have shown an irresponsible disregard to the issue and the state and social consequences due to pandering for Latino votes. His proposal for guest workers is fine and dandy in theory but you know these people are going to come in with one legal hook, drop babies and then have anchor children that are citizens.

It's amazing you can't even seriously debate this issue without racism being brought out as the first rebuttal. The only person I know of in Congress that will take a public stand on this is Tom Tancredo (R)- Colorado. If there's a Democrat in the House or Senate that speaks out on this issue I'm not aware of him/her but would be happy to be told there was.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']

It's amazing you can't even seriously debate this issue without racism being brought out as the first rebuttal. The only person I know of in Congress that will take a public stand on this is Tom Tancredo (R)- Colorado. If there's a Democrat in the House or Senate that speaks out on this issue I'm not aware of him/her but would be happy to be told there was.[/QUOTE]

You implied all Dems. Quit hiding from what you wrote. You could have made it clear but that would require a little honesty from you.

Excuse me? I didn't mention racism. The racism charge is weak. I know that functionally there is a racial component because the vast majority of illegals are of a particular type. But is doesn't matter. Illegal is illegal.

Plus It bothers me that some American Latinos put the interests of "La Raza" above their country. (I am equally bothered by other groups who do this)

One mo' point. The Government of Mexico is at fault as well. Not only do they encourage illegal crossings, they provide sanctuary for crimminals who flee the US.
 
I'm going to do a classic PAD reply.

You are wrong, you are on the wrong side, everything your side stands for is wrong. I don't need proof, everything I say is right.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']

It's amazing you can't even seriously debate this issue without racism being brought out as the first rebuttal. The only person I know of in Congress that will take a public stand on this is Tom Tancredo (R)- Colorado. If there's a Democrat in the House or Senate that speaks out on this issue I'm not aware of him/her but would be happy to be told there was.[/QUOTE]


yea it is quite suprising. Before you even start a topic you are a hateful racist. Its like they have that remark saved so they can make a real quick reply.

not saying I agree with everything you say, but just because someone does not agree with your politics does not mean they deserved to be bashed unrelentlessly
 
[quote name='CaseyRyback']yea it is quite suprising. Before you even start a topic you are a hateful racist. Its like they have that remark saved so they can make a real quick reply.

not saying I agree with everything you say, but just because someone does not agree with your politics does not mean they deserved to be bashed unrelentlessly[/QUOTE]

Well, a racist is always a racist, whether they're posting or not. But no one called him a racist here, so I don't see his point in complaining about it.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']Seriously, the DEMOCRATS are fighting to tighten the borders, and the REPUBLICANS are fighting to keep them open.[/QUOTE]

Bullshit. Both Democrats and Republicans, at least a majority of politicians from both parties, don't want to tighten the border because they fear political reprecussions from Latinos.
 
[quote name='elprincipe']Bullshit. Both Democrats and Republicans, at least a majority of politicians from both parties, don't want to tighten the border because they fear political reprecussions from Latinos.[/QUOTE]

Right, which is my primary beef with Bush is that he is so lax on the borders. Pissed was I when he called the Minutemen "vigilantes". La Raza is the vigilate group, not the Minutemen.
 
[quote name='Tiphireth'] Pissed was I when he called the Minutemen "vigilantes". La Raza is the vigilate group, not the Minutemen.[/QUOTE]


they both are.
 
PAD, pay attention to what you quote. The issue isn't whether or not we allow illegal immigrants to continue to come into the country. The issue is how it will be controlled. Getting a bunch of citizens to volunteer to watch the borders with guns is asking for trouble. I agree that the immigration process needs to be controlled better, if only for the fact that then companies will be required to pay these immigrants an actual livable wage. My grandparents came from Mexico, did things the right way and worked their butts off. And they deserve a lot of respect for that. Even those that do come in illegally deserve some respect, because they work 12-14 hour days many times, and for far less than any of us would be willing to accept as pay. It's not fair to them, it's not fair to anyone, including us. But it is absurd to think that the way to solve the issue is to trust that people volunteering to guard the borders with guns will not abuse that duty. Find a way to control the borders legally and then we'll talk.
 
[quote name='BigSpoonyBard']PAD, pay attention to what you quote. The issue isn't whether or not we allow illegal immigrants to continue to come into the country. The issue is how it will be controlled. Getting a bunch of citizens to volunteer to watch the borders with guns is asking for trouble. I agree that the immigration process needs to be controlled better, if only for the fact that then companies will be required to pay these immigrants an actual livable wage. My grandparents came from Mexico, did things the right way and worked their butts off. And they deserve a lot of respect for that. Even those that do come in illegally deserve some respect, because they work 12-14 hour days many times, and for far less than any of us would be willing to accept as pay. It's not fair to them, it's not fair to anyone, including us. But it is absurd to think that the way to solve the issue is to trust that people volunteering to guard the borders with guns will not abuse that duty. Find a way to control the borders legally and then we'll talk.[/QUOTE]

I'm still trying to figure out why those gangs are legal. I can't find why they're not, but I can't believe they are.
 
If the "Minute Men" really wanted to stop illegal immigration, they should volunteer to do the jobs the illegals are coming for. Go pick some crops for sub-minimum pay. Clean someone's house "off the books." Find some other back-breaking job that Americans are unwilling to do. And stop shopping at Wal-Mart, McDonald's and other places that exploit illegals. If there are no jobs for them, the illegals won't come here.

But the "Minute Men" won't do that because they want to play weekend warrior, sit in lawn chairs and look tough.

Does anyone thik we couldn't seal off our border if we really wanted to? We could but it would be disastrous to farming and other industries that depend on cheap labor.
 
There shouldn't be any crap jobs in America.

A company like Wal-Mart makes so much profit it could easily double it's workforce and double it's pay.

Farm jobs used to be good jobs, because when nobody is using slave or immigrant workers, farm owners can afford to pay higher wages and still be competitive.


The only crap job should be suctioning out portable toilets, and the people who do that are paid a lot of money because many illegal immigrants are not even willing to do it.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']There shouldn't be any crap jobs in America.

A company like Wal-Mart makes so much profit it could easily double it's workforce and double it's pay.

Farm jobs used to be good jobs, because when nobody is using slave or immigrant workers, farm owners can afford to pay higher wages and still be competitive.[/QUOTE]

I agree that every job in the US should pay minimum wage and minimum wage should be raised to a livable standard.

It's the employers of illegals that are the root of the problem.
 
It should be ammended into the constitution that the minimum wage should cover the cost of living, varying by city, and be revised at least every other year.
 
Wal Mart employs over 900,000 people in this country. If the "average" Wal Mart employee makes $25,000 (Average, of managers, executives, drivers, warehouse workers etc.) and you double that to $50,000 you still think Wal Mart is going to make money?

Hmmm, let's do the math.... That's $22.5 billion in annual payroll, double that to $45 billion and you've cut their net income to -$12.3 billion. Yeah, I think Wal Mart will be lining up to lose $12 billion dollars.

Wonder tard.
 
[quote name='Quackzilla']It should be ammended into the constitution that the minimum wage should cover the cost of living, varying by city, and be revised at least every other year.[/QUOTE]

BWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I think we have a new winner of the "Stupidest Thing Ever Said on the vs. Mode"! Yeah, 36 states and the Congress will get right on ammending the Constitution every odd year.

OMG, you really are dumb as dirt.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']BWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I think we have a new winner of the "Stupidest Thing Ever Said on the vs. Mode"! Yeah, 36 states and the Congress will get right on ammending the Constitution every odd year.

OMG, you really are dumb as dirt.[/QUOTE]

No, a single ammendment stating that the minimum wage should be revised every other year based on the cost of living in each city.

I didn't mean ammend the constitution every other year and you knew that.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Wal Mart employs over 900,000 people in this country. If the "average" Wal Mart employee makes $25,000 (Average, of managers, executives, drivers, warehouse workers etc.) and you double that to $50,000 you still think Wal Mart is going to make money?

Hmmm, let's do the math.... That's $22.5 billion in annual payroll, double that to $45 billion and you've cut their net income to -$12.3 billion. Yeah, I think Wal Mart will be lining up to lose $12 billion dollars.

Wonder tard.[/QUOTE]

That's some dubious math. First of all, managers and executives wouldn't need their salaries doubled to make them livable wages. The minimum wage workers are getting $10,712 annually ($5.15 x 40 hours x 52 weeks). That level could be raised without eliminating Wal-Mart's profits. And you're also assuming that Wal-Mart wouldn't raise prices to offset this payroll increase.
 
[quote name='MrBadExample']That's some dubious math. First of all, managers and executives wouldn't need their salaries doubled to make them livable wages. The minimum wage workers are getting $10,712 annually ($5.15 x 40 hours x 52 weeks). That level could be raised without eliminating Wal-Mart's profits. And you're also assuming that Wal-Mart wouldn't raise prices to offset this payroll increase.[/QUOTE]

Don't forget that Wal-Mart hires people for 39 hour weeks so they don't have to pay them for full-time wages.
 
[quote name='MrBadExample']Does anyone thik we couldn't seal off our border if we really wanted to? We could but it would be disastrous to farming and other industries that depend on cheap labor.[/QUOTE]

Of course we could close off the border. That's what the National Guard should be used for, backing up the Border Patrol to stop illegals. If we had politicians with any balls, they would do that and then increase legal immigration to provide necessary labor.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']BWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I think we have a new winner of the "Stupidest Thing Ever Said on the vs. Mode"! Yeah, 36 states and the Congress will get right on ammending the Constitution every odd year.

OMG, you really are dumb as dirt.[/QUOTE]



LOL


Yes what a brilliant idea.
 
[quote name='MrBadExample']
Does anyone thik we couldn't seal off our border if we really wanted to? We could but it would be disastrous to farming and other industries that depend on cheap labor.[/QUOTE]

Hey, the commies did it with Berlin and the Chinese with their Wall. Don't see how we couldn't.

New inflamatory sig= hottness.
 
bread's done
Back
Top