Did the Associated Press alter this image?

rabbitt

CAGiversary!
Feedback
7 (100%)
I noticed a difference between an image in the New York Times and my city's paper, the Akron Beacon Journal, both in today's edition:

NYT:

nyt.jpg


ABJ:

abj.jpg


It may not seem like a big deal, but from what I understand (and was taught in my Journalism classes), newspapers are to edit pictures under vital circumstances only, such as cropping. It's beyond me what the purpose of this edit is, but it makes me wonder how often my paper photoshops pictures, and to what degree. Thoughts on this? If any journalists out there could offer insight, that would be helpful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='JolietJake']Eh, there have been much worse edits, at least they were just translating the text.[/QUOTE]

No, they didn't. The exact translation is "Hound Dog for Pussy Express". It was left over from the Clinton trip earlier this month.
 
[quote name='JolietJake']Eh, there have been much worse edits, at least they were just translating the text.[/QUOTE]

Only part of the text was translated. Namely the part that says 中國 or in English, China.
 
[quote name='JolietJake']Well from the photos it's hard to see how far down the ramp he is in the second picture.[/QUOTE]

That's true. In the NYT photo, he's nearer to the plane's door. In the left corner of the AP picture, you can see a camera being held up. That said, the railing looks different also.
 
bread's done
Back
Top