Franklin Graham says 'religious rights' denied

[quote name='depascal22']Because this is America and children aren't judged by the sins of their parents.

Back on topic, why do some people on here seem to feel that Christianity is untouchable for criticism? You can bash everything all day long but as soon as someone says, "Catholics need to figure out how to get their priests from molesting small boys.", you've got a riot on your hands. Now, I'm not only anti-Catholic but anti-Christian AND anti-religion. I understand that faith is a touchy subject for some but are you really that threatened by video forum discourse?[/QUOTE]

.............
 
[quote name='depascal22']So asking why Christianity is somehow bulletproof is the evidence of my hate for Christianity? Really?[/QUOTE]

So you love Christianity then? (cue Mallrats)
 
[quote name='depascal22']So asking why Christianity is somehow bulletproof is the evidence of my hate for Christianity? Really?[/QUOTE]

Absolutely. Also, you're with the terrorists because this is a Christian nation.
 
holy shit, depascal. The evidence is in what you said. You asked where I came up with you saying that you were anti religion. I quoted you verbatim saying that you are.

If you say that you are not anti religion and you were being sarcastic, I believe you. I was simply pointing out that you said you were. That is way more slack than the norm for the internets.
 
[quote name='xxDOYLExx']holy shit, depascal. The evidence is in what you said. You asked where I came up with you saying that you were anti religion. I quoted you verbatim saying that you are.

If you say that you are not anti religion and you were being sarcastic, I believe you. I was simply pointing out that you said you were. That is way more slack than the norm for the internets.[/QUOTE]

Look at FoC's post right below it. The question mark was implied but I guess I have to put everything down for the lowest common denominator.
 
[quote name='depascal22']Look at FoC's post right below it. The question mark was implied but I guess I have to put everything down for the lowest common denominator.[/QUOTE]

you are a dipshit?
 
i'm so lost in this argument. am I missing something, like some hidden sarcasm, or is depascal really getting upset because doyle didn't catch the "implied" question mark? the sentence really can be read either way, so not putting a question mark and instead putting a period can really alter the way a person reads that sentence. I read it the same way doyle did, so I guess I'm an idiot too.
 
It's just the implied question makes sense when you read the ENTIRE paragraph. Like I said, lowest common denominator.

And saying "When?" doesn't mean my panties are in a bunch. I could've called you a piece of shit that knows absolutely nothing but all I said was "When?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top