thrustbucket
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 7 (100%)
[quote name='mykevermin']Bullshit. I'm sure WB was paid a hefty sum, but half a billion? *any* speculation on what WB's financial take was is just that. Until I see a reliable source put a number out there (the way NY Times and others mentioned 150m to Paramount/Dreamworks), I call complete bullshit.
Half a billion. Heh.
And FOX? Chalk me up for another heh. Those cats ran scared with their tails between their legs when BD was cracked last year before full implementation of BD+ encryption (which, although cracked, yes, I know - is disc specific, so they managed to crack a single title). I don't see them going HD DVD exclusive until the bitter end, just like I would expect Universal to do in the opposite case.
That said, if you'd like to discuss this further, I'll be in the format war thread. I'm not going to bring that nonsense in this 'un.[/QUOTE]
Actually it is true. The insider thread on AVS is full of people "in the know" admitting it's true. Not the money itself. Let me quote Dave Vaughn, insider for Home theater Spot, known to have many connections in the industry:
So yes, Fox was in negotiations with HD DVD. And for whatever reason, they went back to Sony and asked them to counter offer. Warner was simply going to go whichever way Fox went (or any other studio).
It's just very interesting that no studio decision here had anything to do with which format they liked better or which one they thought was "winning" it all had to do with incentives.
Half a billion. Heh.
And FOX? Chalk me up for another heh. Those cats ran scared with their tails between their legs when BD was cracked last year before full implementation of BD+ encryption (which, although cracked, yes, I know - is disc specific, so they managed to crack a single title). I don't see them going HD DVD exclusive until the bitter end, just like I would expect Universal to do in the opposite case.
That said, if you'd like to discuss this further, I'll be in the format war thread. I'm not going to bring that nonsense in this 'un.[/QUOTE]
Actually it is true. The insider thread on AVS is full of people "in the know" admitting it's true. Not the money itself. Let me quote Dave Vaughn, insider for Home theater Spot, known to have many connections in the industry:
And you are right...it wasn't a slam dunk. For people celebrating for Blu-ray, it could just as easily have gone the other way...yes it was that close. There was an agreement in principle between Toshiba, Fox and Warner, but FOX pulled out at the 11th hour and went to Sony with their intentions. To Sony's credit, the did whatever it took to get Fox and Warner (although Warner is denying any type of incentives...if you believe this, I have a bridge for sale if anyone is interested). For the record, I think "incentives" are perfectly acceptable and a part of doing business.
Let's look at this from a business perspective. Is Toshiba harmed by losing HD DVD? Yes, but not to the degree that Sony would be if Blu-ray died. Sony has literally bet the farm on Blu-ray with the PS3. The PS3 isn't considered a successful game machine (yet), and if Sony lost Fox and Warner after the Paramount defection, that would have been the end of Blu-ray and possibly the end of Sony as we know it.
So yes, Fox was in negotiations with HD DVD. And for whatever reason, they went back to Sony and asked them to counter offer. Warner was simply going to go whichever way Fox went (or any other studio).
It's just very interesting that no studio decision here had anything to do with which format they liked better or which one they thought was "winning" it all had to do with incentives.