IGN Hates 360

LinkinPrime

CAGiversary!
Feedback
172 (100%)
IGN » Insider » Roundtable Roundtable #159: Broken 360s All I'm saying is my Dreamcast still works. by IGN Staff

April 20, 2006 - David Clayman, IGN Insider: When the 360 was first released there were scattered reports of lemons and permanent crashes. A few weeks later there was a running joke in the office that inserting a DOA disc would result in a nuclear explosion. The list of editors who'd experienced the blinking ring of death continued to grow but with my console working fine I was hardly bothered by the misfortunes of everyone else.

Now that my most anticipated game of the past few years is in my hands I've started to receive game-ending dirty disc errors. I suppose these manufacturing errors are unavoidable considering the incredible complexity of the machine combined with the rush to make the "world-wide" launch. All I'm saying is that I fired up my Dreamcast this weekend and it's working just fine.

Are these errors, crashes, and general decline in reliability just something we'll have to learn to deal with as game consoles become more complex? Personally, the reason I lean towards consoles is because I'm lazy. Normally you make the purchase, plug it in, and there's nothing more to worry about.

How does this change your expectations for the PlayStation 3 or figure into Nintendo's plans?

------------------------------------------------

Hilary Goldstein, IGN Comics: The 360 sucks. I don't care about power, games, and achievement points. **** that. It seems like 2/3 of all systems bought by people in the IGN offices has broken. That sucks.

In contrast, my seven-year-old Dreamcast still works perfectly.

------------------------------------------------

Teddy Pierson, IGN Community Manager: Not to state the obvious... But MS is not really known for rock solid stability in their products. They are more for the paper ink and wow factor, hence the "world wide launch" bull that produced exactly what they wanted, shortages. Which is turn got them a lot of publicity portraying, "people killing their mothers in order to get a 360". I'm sure we can all debate what the faults are or reasons for so many 360s sinkin' in the drink. But what it comes down to is poor building standards from the Umbrella Corporation. Meaning... when Nintendo, for example, builds something... they build it to last and they make sure of it. When MS builds something, it breaks and millions of people turn into zombies.

I don't know, that's my quick and dirty comments without writing a novel...

------------------------------------------------

Scott Senkowski, IGN Design: Is this that big of a surprise? Microsoft basically took a G5, which is about the size of a car door, made it even more powerful and crammed it into a case about four apples high. Granted, this may be tall for a smurf but it's way too small for a beefed up desktop turned console.

As for the PS3, I'm guessing the same if not worse. They are rocking entirely new hardware, from the cell chip to the über-GPU. Not to mention the addition of Blu-Ray's insanity. All this stuffed into a George Foreman Grill? Not bloody likely.

Look at this monster and it just plays Blu-Ray movies.

------------------------------------------------

Gerry Block, IGN Gear: I'm beginning to think that the reason why 360s are still hard to find at retail, even after Peter Moore promised otherwise, is the fact that MS is now replacing the majority of 360s they shipped at Christmas. Out of a pool of more than 20 360s around IGN, almost all of them have broken, right? That's not a bad sample size, and the rate of failure is staggering.

On the other hand, none of my consoles have ever lived very long. I went through 3 PS1s, 2 DreamCasts, 2 Genesises, and my second PS2 just died last week. It's not even as though I'm rough with them. Failing after a year or two is one thing, however, and failing after a month is quite another.

Microsoft will probably have a way to hide the real numbers, but their next quarterly report and annual statement may be interesting reads if they have to report excessive expenses based on 360 hardware failure. 2 million units shipped, 1 million units functionally installed? Maybe.

------------------------------------------------

Jessica Chobot, IGN Host: I am highly disappointed with my 360. Not only with the basic console functions (or lack thereof) but also their customer service help and repair centers. After my 360 took its inevitable dump, I spent countless hours trying to talk with someone who wasn't an utter jerk-off. It took 10 tries and finally a threat to get any kind of problem solving to occur.

After sending it back to be repaired the first time, I received it back...about 2 weeks later... and it was a different model and more broken than the one I had sent them originally. This meant another 2 days dealing with the help line from Marrakesh.

What can this do for the PS3 and Revolution? Well, I feel the bigger question is what can the PS3 push back launch date do for the Rev (those are the two competitors I truly follow in these console wars). I thought that Nintendo may have bagged it and inched themselves back towards the top rung of the console wars due to the PS3's mamby-pamby announcements and failed launch dates (similar to their weak sauce PSP browser, games and UMD output vs. the DS and soon-to-be DS Lite) and the 360's obvious flaws. Yet with the Rev's controller yet to be proven as "innovative" as it's being touted by the ever efficient Nintendo PR team-we'll just have to wait and see.

So, at this point, I'm still looking at the Nintendo and PS3 race as being more neck and neck with the 360 slightly ahead mostly due to Oblivion and the fact that, although broken, it has been launched

------------------------------------------------

Dan Adams, IGN PC: I love Oblivion and play it every night on my perfectly operational Xbox 360! Microsoft is my lover.

------------------------------------------------

Peer Schneider, IGN Blog Promoter: Disappointed with the 360's functions? You mean, the lack of it functioning at all, I hope. I can't say that I'm disappointed with the Xbox 360 hardware in any area -- except for reliability. **** about Microsoft Windows crashes all you want, but the software powering the 360 with its dashboard system is pretty awesome. But yeah, if my console is any indication, the hardware launched without enough reliability testing. Apart from occasional crashes that may or may not be software-related (Oblivion freezing up while loading, PGR crashing when exiting to the dashboard, etc.), I've seen more errors booting games on 360 than any other console. I'm on Xbox 360 #2 now, and last night the machine told me that Tomb Raider Legend isn't an Xbox 360 disc. Restarting the box fixed it, but it's still an irritating (and disconcerting) thing to see after my first one flashed the three-eyed skull.

Is that because the machine is more complex than ever? Sure. But let's not forget that the price tag also went up, the price of the games and controllers went up, and a year's worth of paid warranty coverage is now "recommended" by the manufacturer. I'm also paying for an annual gaming service and am expected to pay money for small downloads that enhance the look of my on-screen desktop. This console eats money for breakfast. If I bought a DVD player or a receiver for $500 and the thing broke on me and a few friends after three months, I'd return it to the store and get another machine altogether. With a console, you don't really have that choice. I want to play Oblivion, so I have to just take it and send my 360 off to the service center. It's the curse of being an early adopter. But the fault definitely lies with Microsoft.

I've already gone through the whole anger phase so I'm pretty mellow about my hardware experience with 360 right now. My first PlayStation 2 was busted on day 1 -- luckily I was able to get another one from the store that same day. If my friend wasn't studying for an exam, I'd be screwed without my 360 right now, though. Out of my classic consoles, the only one that broke was my Super Famicom -- but that's because Fran borrowed it for a week. He must've showered with it, or something. The only other machine to break on me was, brace yourself, the original Xbox. That first-gen $#@% Thomson drive decided to not read some of the later game discs. I firmly believe that MS should've recalled the units or at least offered free service.

I do think that Sony could face similar issues since its console also uses all-new and unproven drive technology and high-powered (that means hot) chips. But when it comes down to it, Sony is a bit more experienced, being a longtime hardware manufacturer. And let it be known: when my Sony Vaio computer started to smoke one day, it took Sony four days to replace it. And they sent me a free Sony Clie (hey Jess, there is that crazy thing again!) to make up for the problems. So, Microsoft: how about a free copy of Halo 3? Or maybe some free horse armor?

------------------------------------------------

Jeremy Dunham, IGN PlayStation: Outside of one freezing glitch that I got once while playing Condemned, I haven't had any problems.

But that could be contributed to my conspiracy theory that it's just a ploy by Microsoft to win me over since I run the PlayStation sites.

------------------------------------------------

Hilary Goldstein, IGN Comics: The loading errors are an easy fix, Peer. Eject the disc, blow on it a few times, reinsert and hit power. Should work 22% of the time

What do you guys think about all of this? They are obviously biased against X360 (just like EGM/1UP) to make such claims as "XBOX360 SUCKS". How can they be so hypocritical and expect us to read their previews/reviews and comments?
 
Yes, that's exactly what they said. That entire little article was nothing but "360 TEH SUXZORZ!!!!" and did not contain any reasonable discussion about the problems with their 360s. Really. We were reading the exact same article, so I got the exact same impression you did. Seriously.
 
[quote name='evanft']Yes, that's exactly what they said. That entire little article was nothing but "360 TEH SUXZORZ!!!!" and did not contain any reasonable discussion about the problems with their 360s. Really. We were reading the exact same article, so I got the exact same impression you did. Seriously.[/quote]

:rofl:

op, did you read the whole thing? here are some parts that you obviously missed:

Scott Senkowski, IGN Design: Is this that big of a surprise? Microsoft basically took a G5, which is about the size of a car door, made it even more powerful and crammed it into a case about four apples high. Granted, this may be tall for a smurf but it's way too small for a beefed up desktop turned console.

As for the PS3, I'm guessing the same if not worse. They are rocking entirely new hardware, from the cell chip to the über-GPU. Not to mention the addition of Blu-Ray's insanity. All this stuffed into a George Foreman Grill? Not bloody likely.

Look at this monster and it just plays Blu-Ray movies.

Gerry Block, IGN Gear: I'm beginning to think that the reason why 360s are still hard to find at retail, even after Peter Moore promised otherwise, is the fact that MS is now replacing the majority of 360s they shipped at Christmas. Out of a pool of more than 20 360s around IGN, almost all of them have broken, right? That's not a bad sample size, and the rate of failure is staggering.

On the other hand, none of my consoles have ever lived very long. I went through 3 PS1s, 2 DreamCasts, 2 Genesises, and my second PS2 just died last week. It's not even as though I'm rough with them. Failing after a year or two is one thing, however, and failing after a month is quite another...

Jessica Chobot, IGN Host:...What can this do for the PS3 and Revolution? Well, I feel the bigger question is what can the PS3 push back launch date do for the Rev (those are the two competitors I truly follow in these console wars). I thought that Nintendo may have bagged it and inched themselves back towards the top rung of the console wars due to the PS3's mamby-pamby announcements and failed launch dates (similar to their weak sauce PSP browser, games and UMD output vs. the DS and soon-to-be DS Lite) and the 360's obvious flaws. Yet with the Rev's controller yet to be proven as "innovative" as it's being touted by the ever efficient Nintendo PR team-we'll just have to wait and see...

Dan Adams, IGN PC: I love Oblivion and play it every night on my perfectly operational Xbox 360! Microsoft is my lover.

Peer Schneider, IGN Blog Promoter: ...I've already gone through the whole anger phase so I'm pretty mellow about my hardware experience with 360 right now. My first PlayStation 2 was busted on day 1 -- luckily I was able to get another one from the store that same day. If my friend wasn't studying for an exam, I'd be screwed without my 360 right now, though. Out of my classic consoles, the only one that broke was my Super Famicom -- but that's because Fran borrowed it for a week. He must've showered with it, or something. The only other machine to break on me was, brace yourself, the original Xbox. That first-gen $#@% Thomson drive decided to not read some of the later game discs. I firmly believe that MS should've recalled the units or at least offered free service.

I do think that Sony could face similar issues since its console also uses all-new and unproven drive technology and high-powered (that means hot) chips. But when it comes down to it, Sony is a bit more experienced, being a longtime hardware manufacturer. And let it be known: when my Sony Vaio computer started to smoke one day, it took Sony four days to replace it. And they sent me a free Sony Clie (hey Jess, there is that crazy thing again!) to make up for the problems. So, Microsoft: how about a free copy of Halo 3? Or maybe some free horse armor?

Jeremy Dunham, IGN PlayStation: Outside of one freezing glitch that I got once while playing Condemned, I haven't had any problems...

Hilary Goldstein, IGN Comics: The loading errors are an easy fix, Peer. Eject the disc, blow on it a few times, reinsert and hit power. Should work 22% of the time
 
Eh, whatever. Let them say what they want. I've experienced a broken 360 and had hassles in getting it fixed but I have no regrets on my purchase and still consider the 360 the best console I've ever owned.
 
it's not like there is any unbiased reviewers these days.

they all have an agenda to push, whether it be thru advertising or what.
 
People still read IGN?

Its been progressively getting worse on all ends of the spectrum. No one found it a little odd that they're constantly looking new editors on a semi weekly basis?

Did Microsoft make some mistakes? Sure. Do they deserve to be discussed? Certainly.

However, I don't think IGN should be just flaunting an "I really fucking hate Microsoft" badge. If I was Microsoft, I'd show them the door. No special interviews. No preview builds. Nothing. If they hate the 360 so much, why even bother have a 360 channel?
 
[quote name='doraemonkerpal']:rofl:

op, did you read the whole thing? here are some parts that you obviously missed:[/quote]

Yes I did read the whole thing. My point is that they are blatantly stating that the 360 is no good. Such comments as:

The 360 sucks. I don't care about power, games, and achievement points. **** that. It seems like 2/3 of all systems bought by people in the IGN offices has broken. That sucks.

In contrast, my seven-year-old Dreamcast still works perfectly.



Out of a pool of more than 20 360s around IGN, almost all of them have broken, right? That's not a bad sample size, and the rate of failure is staggering.

2 million units shipped, 1 million units functionally installed? Maybe.

But what it comes down to is poor building standards from the Umbrella Corporation. Meaning... when Nintendo, for example, builds something... they build it to last and they make sure of it. When MS builds something, it breaks and millions of people turn into zombies.

The whole article is based on "lets bash X360" Everyone ofcourse sees everything differently and has their own opinions. You may find it funny but I dont. They are supposed to be a media source for all gamers/systems. Its obvious that they are just throwing random thoughts of anger without actual data. Claiming that millions of units are lemons based on almost 20 units going bad in their office and chatter from angry/disappointed consumers is a very irresponsible claim.
 
[quote name='terribledeli']People still read IGN?

Its been progressively getting worse on all ends of the spectrum. No one found it a little odd that they're constantly looking new editors on a semi weekly basis?

Did Microsoft make some mistakes? Sure. Do they deserve to be discussed? Certainly.

However, I don't think IGN should be just flaunting an "I really fucking hate Microsoft" badge. If I was Microsoft, I'd show them the door. No special interviews. No preview builds. Nothing. If they hate the 360 so much, why even bother have a 360 channel?[/quote]

QFT :applause:
 
Can't wait to see the Sony fanboys thread crap all over this...

IGN... has always been hating on everything thats not sony..
 
I'm just surprised by Gerry Block's comment that his systems tend to die often, even with good care and all. I think it's a pretty bad level of complacency when we reach the point where a system working for a year or two is considered a "good thing".

Otherwise, yes, there's some bias but it does tend to stem from their own circumstances. Whether or not those circumstances have been exaggerated, that's a little bit harder to tell, but at least most of the staff is also supportive of the 360 or have other, extremely valid points about next-gen systems and what they're trying to pull off.
 
[quote name='LinkinPrime']Yes I did read the whole thing. My point is that they are blatantly stating that the 360 is no good. Such comments as:

The 360 sucks. I don't care about power, games, and achievement points. **** that. It seems like 2/3 of all systems bought by people in the IGN offices has broken. That sucks.

In contrast, my seven-year-old Dreamcast still works perfectly.



Out of a pool of more than 20 360s around IGN, almost all of them have broken, right? That's not a bad sample size, and the rate of failure is staggering.

2 million units shipped, 1 million units functionally installed? Maybe.

But what it comes down to is poor building standards from the Umbrella Corporation. Meaning... when Nintendo, for example, builds something... they build it to last and they make sure of it. When MS builds something, it breaks and millions of people turn into zombies.

The whole article is based on "lets bash X360" Everyone ofcourse sees everything differently and has their own opinions. You may find it funny but I dont. They are supposed to be a media source for all gamers/systems. Its obvious that they are just throwing random thoughts of anger without actual data. Claiming that millions of units are lemons based on almost 20 units going bad in their office and chatter from angry/disappointed consumers is a very irresponsible claim.[/quote]
i took a quote from everybody who was interviewed except the first two people. the first person sounds like he's just messing around. the second person hates microsoft itself. everybody else is trying to answer the original question stated in the article:

Are these errors, crashes, and general decline in reliability just something we'll have to learn to deal with as game consoles become more complex? Personally, the reason I lean towards consoles is because I'm lazy. Normally you make the purchase, plug it in, and there's nothing more to worry about.

How does this change your expectations for the PlayStation 3 or figure into Nintendo's plans?

what i found funny was evanft's quote, not the "xbox360 bashing".
 
[quote name='Chris in Cali']Xbox 360 is surpassing Nintendo for ultra-aggressive fanboys more and more everyday.[/QUOTE]

Maybe because there hasn't been a Cube game released since RE4 that's been worth purchasing to me and my PS2 and Cube are covered in dust. That's a powerful statement to me which console is worth something to me and which is not.
 
Check out the links to these pics:

roundtable-159-broken-360s-20060420104547168-000.jpg


roundtable-159-broken-360s-20060420114316027-000.jpg



More proof. (Right Click pic -> Properties to find ign link)
 
[quote name='Chris in Cali']Xbox 360 is surpassing Nintendo for ultra-aggressive fanboys more and more everyday.[/QUOTE]

Maybe because the system is unfairly attacked more and more everyday.
 
Well, I kind of agree with them... don't get me wrong, I love my 360 but in the back of my head I'm just waiting for the thing to break and I really believe it's only a matter of time before it does and that's a shitty way to feel after spending all that money.

Tomb Raider isn't readable media according to my 360 about 1 out of every 4 times I load it up and it has also crashed twice. Burnout crashes routinely when it is trying to save which is infuriating after getting a record or something. DOA crashes my system every single time I play it but only after about 30 minutes or so. Ever since I got rid of Oblivion I've noticed it running a little better though. Either way, it's total bullshit.

I've NEVER had a problem with a Nintendo made product in the last 20 years I've been a customer and I've owned everything and multiple gameboys). I love my 360 when it works though and for now it's enough to put up with the crashing
 
if I ran a magazine or site and the majority of the systems in my office broke, I'd probably write an article about it.

what are they supposed to do? sweep it under the carpet and lie?

you people seem to forget the difference between "bias" and "overwhelming evidence that logically sways a person's opinion one way." did they say they were going to rate all 360 games low from now on? no. they're just bitching about broken systems, which any gamer would.
 
[quote name='LinkinPrime']How can they be so hypocritical and expect us to read their previews/reviews and comments?[/quote]
2006 FIFA World Cup Sports 8.4 4/18/2006
Far Cry Instincts Predator
Shooter 8.3 3/30/2006
Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, The
RPG 9.3 3/24/2006
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Shooter 9.2 3/07/2006
Burnout Revenge
Racing 8.9 3/06/2006
EA Sports Fight Night Round 3
Sports 8.5 2/17/200
Dead or Alive 4 Fighting 9.0 12/28/2005
Perfect Dark Zero
Shooter 8.4 11/23/2005
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Action 8.7 11/17/2005

just b/c they have a problem with the hardware doesn't mean they will be baised against the game reviews. i hate it whenever my damn computer crashes, but that doesn't mean i hate command & conquer: red alert or counterstrike.

edit: i made my post easier to read.
 
[quote name='Apossum']if I ran a magazine or site and the majority of the systems in my office broke, I'd probably write an article about it.

what are they supposed to do? sweep it under the carpet and lie?[/quote]

I agree, mention it. Just dont bash and overexaggerate to the point of saying 50% of systems are lemons or that there are a million bad ones out there.
 
[quote name='LinkinPrime']I agree, mention it. Just dont bash and overexaggerate to the point of saying 50% of systems are lemons or that there are a million bad ones out there.[/QUOTE]



they didn't say that. they made some amateurish statements about their office being a good sample (pft) but that's what their roundtable feature is all about-- opinions. sometimes those opinions don't come off as neutral, thankfully.
 
[quote name='Apossum']they didn't say that. they made some amateurish statements about their office being a good sample (pft) but that's what their roundtable feature is all about-- opinions. sometimes those opinions don't come off as neutral, thankfully.[/quote]

Out of a pool of more than 20 360s around IGN, almost all of them have broken, right? That's not a bad sample size, and the rate of failure is staggering.

2 million units shipped, 1 million units functionally installed? Maybe.
1 million of 2 million is 50%


But what it comes down to is poor building standards from the Umbrella Corporation. Meaning... when Nintendo, for example, builds something... they build it to last and they make sure of it. When MS builds something, it breaks and millions of people turn into zombies.

Again with the millions.

Even if they were just trying to be funny, its f'ed up to do that being in the position that their in (media industry).
 
btw, i'm not a ps2 fanboy. i've never bashed or expressed my opinion of the xbox360 b/c i don't have one (i hope to get one in the near future). i do have an xbox and play it more than any of my other systems. i've never had a problem from any of my consoles yet (gc, xbox, ps2, psp, gba, etc) *crosses fingers*. i'm defending ign in this situation b/c the article wasn't as harsh as the op would like to believe. they posed a fair and thought provoking question (about future consoles in general) and some of their employees chose to rant a little bit about their xbox360 problems. plus, i always take ign review scores and combine them with gamespots b/c i believe both of their scores accurately reflect my opinions of a game.


[quote name='LinkinPrime']Again with the millions.

Even if they were just trying to be funny, its f'ed up to do that being in the position that their in (media industry).[/quote]
that came from one out of nine staff members they interviewed. notice that the interview did not include ALL of their staff members and reviewers. you shouldn't generalize the whole company b/c of what one person said.
 
[quote name='terribledeli']People still read IGN?

Its been progressively getting worse on all ends of the spectrum. No one found it a little odd that they're constantly looking new editors on a semi weekly basis?

Did Microsoft make some mistakes? Sure. Do they deserve to be discussed? Certainly.

However, I don't think IGN should be just flaunting an "I really fucking hate Microsoft" badge. If I was Microsoft, I'd show them the door. No special interviews. No preview builds. Nothing. If they hate the 360 so much, why even bother have a 360 channel?[/QUOTE]

Of course people read IGN, if Gamepro has subscribers you really think IGN is going anytime soon?
 
2 million units shipped, 1 million units functionally installed? Maybe.

still within the boundaries of an op-ed. sure it's amateurish to use hyperbole, but almost every media outlet does it.

But what it comes down to is poor building standards from the Umbrella Corporation. Meaning... when Nintendo, for example, builds something... they build it to last and they make sure of it. When MS builds something, it breaks and millions of people turn into zombies.

what? he's got a point. Nintendo systems are solid. but that section is pretty much just a bitter joke cause they're systems are crashing and breaking. and I'm a nerd for laughing at it when i first read it :lol: and once again, it's a roundtable discussion that always has these kinds of lines in it...
 
In all honesty I'm actually continuously shocked at how little people care about having a durable system. The thing is if I spent $400 on a game console that thing better work pretty damn well for awhile. If it broke, scratched a disc, or overheated within a few months I'd go nuts.

The major problem is most of these system are designed to do something else or their hardware is not built from a video game only mindset. It's all about how many features it has other than gaming.

I know a lot of people won't want to hear the Nintendo card and I realize the Cube has a lack of new games but....The cube has very short load times, the hardware is durable, and I always feel as if I'm getting my money's worth with Nintendo. It blows my mind how people always laugh at Nintendo's specs when they continue to produce the same quality or better quality games with less.

It's obvious that Sony and M$ throw more hardware and more disk space into their systems rather then thinking about what would make them perform better for games.

When I play my PS2 I think that hardware design took a step backwards with that system. Great games shitty hardware.
 
I don't see anything wrong with what they're saying. They're bagging on a company that's shipped a lot of shitty consoles, and rightfully so.

I don't think they'd be saying all these negative things had their systems not crapped out in the first month or so of owning them.

I haven't personally had any problems with my 360, but I know several people who have. We shouldn't have these kinds of mass problems with our brand new consoles.
 
I can understand why everyone here is being defensive. There's a little fanboy inside all of us that was fed some HGH by the fact that we've all invested so much in our system and we're worried about its long-term health. That's fine. I'm for damn sure worried that my system will die soon, as Oblivion has been locking up on me recently...

But really, attacking people for expressing their opinion in an editorial is misplaced and searching for a conspiracy in it is borderline laughable (the Lemon Faceplate and Skull with Red Ring Eyes pictures were hardly posted on the front page or in any serious article format). They had awful experiences with failing hardware and their opinion reflects that. Perhaps they're a bit too passionate about it, but we all get that way when we're upset -- especially about something that we find important.

Therein lies the flaw in looking for conspiracy... a lot of what they said (and the way they said it) is indicative of people that CARE about their 360. They like the system and as a spurned lover was hurt at a base level by its failings. That hurt led to outlandish claims and cheap shots... but remember it's an editorial in a roundtable format... almost like a chatroom or a *gasp* video game forum where logic doesn't always hold sway and emotions run high.

You expect too much from your media. Relax.

[quote name='"Doug Perry IGN"']People like to bitch, and Microsoft is giving them good reasons to complain. But despite broken machines, which can be replaced by MS, the buzz around this office when Fight Night Round 3, Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter and Oblivion came out have been palpable. Most everyone, despite their misery, has been playing 360 games[/quote]
 
I know I can't count on any company for ALL games, and ALL systems to give good postive and negative coverage to each, but this isn't the first negative article from IGN about 360, do any of you remember the article 10 Reasons to wait for the PS3?
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Maybe because there hasn't been a Cube game released since RE4 that's been worth purchasing to me and my PS2 and Cube are covered in dust. That's a powerful statement to me which console is worth something to me and which is not.[/quote]Don't let Reality's Fringe read that, or he'll post a 2 paragraph rant that's 5% related to what you're talking about, and 95% "I'm trying to be witty and impress my Nintendo fanboy buddies" bullcrap.

My 360 still works fine. Aren't those morons at IGN the same people who found that if you move your 360 from horizontal to vertical while a disc is IN THE MACHINE, AND RUNNING, that you could damage it? These people get PAID to write about games, yet they are that stupid? They probably unplug their 360's and constantly move them around the office with them too.
 
[quote name='VanillaGorilla']They probably unplug their 360's and constantly move them around the office with them too.[/QUOTE]

Well, to be fair, I've noticed that when I try to juggle my 360 along with my PS2 and DVR, it doesn't play games correctly. I really think MS should work on that problem - there are a LOT of jugglers out there.
 
[quote name='VanillaGorilla']Aren't those morons at IGN the same people who found that if you move your 360 from horizontal to vertical while a disc is IN THE MACHINE, AND RUNNING, that you could damage it? These people get PAID to write about games, yet they are that stupid? [/quote]

they get paid to inform people about crap like that and did the public a good service by figuring that out, no?

They probably unplug their 360's and constantly move them around the office with them too.


I think the ability to unplug and move a system around should come with the steep price :lol:
 
[quote name='jkam']In all honesty I'm actually continuously shocked at how little people care about having a durable system. The thing is if I spent $400 on a game console that thing better work pretty damn well for awhile. If it broke, scratched a disc, or overheated within a few months I'd go nuts.[/quote]

I agree completely, and it's fucking annoying as hell to see these idiots say "WELL ITS A NEW CONSOLE OF COURSE IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!1111" What, so because it's a new console we should expect our 300-400 dollar investment to break?

I know a lot of people won't want to hear the Nintendo card and I realize the Cube has a lack of new games but....The cube has very short load times, the hardware is durable, and I always feel as if I'm getting my money's worth with Nintendo. It blows my mind how people always laugh at Nintendo's specs when they continue to produce the same quality or better quality games with less.

You had me at first, but lost me along the way. Nintendo's hardware generally is more reliable. They may produce the "same quality" but it's in much lower quantity. For my money, that makes the console less desirable.

[quote name='WildWop'] I can understand why everyone here is being defensive. There's a little fanboy inside all of us that was fed some HGH by the fact that we've all invested so much in our system and we're worried about its long-term health. That's fine. I'm for damn sure worried that my system will die soon, as Oblivion has been locking up on me recently...

But really, attacking people for expressing their opinion in an editorial is misplaced and searching for a conspiracy in it is borderline laughable (the Lemon Faceplate and Skull with Red Ring Eyes pictures were hardly posted on the front page or in any serious article format). They had awful experiences with failing hardware and their opinion reflects that. Perhaps they're a bit too passionate about it, but we all get that way when we're upset -- especially about something that we find important.

Therein lies the flaw in looking for conspiracy... a lot of what they said (and the way they said it) is indicative of people that CARE about their 360. They like the system and as a spurned lover was hurt at a base level by its failings. That hurt led to outlandish claims and cheap shots... but remember it's an editorial in a roundtable format... almost like a chatroom or a *gasp* video game forum where logic doesn't always hold sway and emotions run high.

You expect too much from your media. Relax.[/quote]
One of the best posts I've read in a while. I can't really say much without just echoing you, but I agree. I don't get why people are so up-in-arms about this. It CLEARLY says it's an editorial. So, what, because they're a popular gaming website their editorials have to maintain a "fair" or "middle-of-the-road"? fuck that. This is clearly a console with problems in regards to hardware, whether an individual has experienced problems or not. I like the console as far as the games go - which is really the most important part - but if you can't fucking PLAY those games because the hardware is awful, you can't really go any further.

It's an article. It's not anything that's going to bring down the 360, and obviously it's not going to change the opinion of anyone here on way or another. That's all there is to it.
 
[quote name='jkam']In all honesty I'm actually continuously shocked at how little people care about having a durable system. The thing is if I spent $400 on a game console that thing better work pretty damn well for awhile. If it broke, scratched a disc, or overheated within a few months I'd go nuts.[/quote]

I agree completely, and it's fucking annoying as hell to see these idiots say "WELL ITS A NEW CONSOLE OF COURSE IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!1111" What, so because it's a new console we should expect our 300-400 dollar investment to break?

I know a lot of people won't want to hear the Nintendo card and I realize the Cube has a lack of new games but....The cube has very short load times, the hardware is durable, and I always feel as if I'm getting my money's worth with Nintendo. It blows my mind how people always laugh at Nintendo's specs when they continue to produce the same quality or better quality games with less.

You had me at first, but lost me along the way. Nintendo's hardware generally is more reliable. They may produce the "same quality" but it's in much lower quantity. For my money, that makes the console less desirable.

[quote name='WildWop'] I can understand why everyone here is being defensive. There's a little fanboy inside all of us that was fed some HGH by the fact that we've all invested so much in our system and we're worried about its long-term health. That's fine. I'm for damn sure worried that my system will die soon, as Oblivion has been locking up on me recently...

But really, attacking people for expressing their opinion in an editorial is misplaced and searching for a conspiracy in it is borderline laughable (the Lemon Faceplate and Skull with Red Ring Eyes pictures were hardly posted on the front page or in any serious article format). They had awful experiences with failing hardware and their opinion reflects that. Perhaps they're a bit too passionate about it, but we all get that way when we're upset -- especially about something that we find important.

Therein lies the flaw in looking for conspiracy... a lot of what they said (and the way they said it) is indicative of people that CARE about their 360. They like the system and as a spurned lover was hurt at a base level by its failings. That hurt led to outlandish claims and cheap shots... but remember it's an editorial in a roundtable format... almost like a chatroom or a *gasp* video game forum where logic doesn't always hold sway and emotions run high.

You expect too much from your media. Relax.[/quote]
One of the best posts I've read in a while. I can't really say much without just echoing you, but I agree. I don't get why people are so up-in-arms about this. It CLEARLY says it's an editorial. So, what, because they're a popular gaming website their editorials have to maintain a "fair" perspective or "middle-of-the-road"? fuck that. This is clearly a console with problems in regards to hardware, whether an individual has experienced problems or not. I like the console as far as the games go - which is really the most important part - but if you can't fucking PLAY those games because the hardware is awful, you can't really go any further.

It's an article. It's not anything that's going to bring down the 360, and obviously it's not going to change the opinion of anyone here one way or another. That's all there is to it.
 
I sent my 360 in to Microsoft early this week for repair. I love the 360, it's a great system, but I completely understand where the IGN people are coming from.

Everyone I know has had to have their 360 repaired. I don't care if you're a $$$$$$ fanboy piece of shit, or if you own every system on the face of the earth. No matter what side you're on, it is complete bullshit that the 360 has these kinds of problems.

And in regards to that one post from IGN that has been quoted a few times--I'm too lazy to quote it here--but it's the one where they say fuck games, achievements, etc... that just means the console needs to work properly for any of that other stuff to matter one damn bit.
 
David Jaffe said it best in his interview with EGM issue 201

"I think game journalists need to challenge us more in the development community, not be such fanboys-actually be reporters and journalists."
 
u guys do seem like zombies i mean id be proud of something i paid all that money on to but reality is all i hear is how these games are a let down or dont work right and freeze.

All I hear is how you all ship ur xbox360s back cause they break .

I thought the psp dead pixel thing was bad but damn I dont get why the zombies arnt hating microsoft right now.

Personaly I woudlnt be to happy about having something like that break on me over n over .

Maybe by next year xbox360s will be fully working and worth some of my time.
 
[quote name='Skelah']u guys do seem like zombies i mean id be proud of something i paid all that money on to but reality is all i hear is how these games are a let down or dont work right and freeze.[/quote]

Whoever tells you "the games are a letdown" is full of shit. Or they just don't own the system to begin with. The 360 has more high-level titles within the first six months of it's life than most systems do for the first year or two.

Really, if there were no/fewer hardware problems, it would be hard to argue this isn't one of the better launches in history.
 
It´s funny when people talk about the quality of Nintendo´s consoles...They seem to forget the NES ...ing PINK screen of death...

Almost half an hour to make a single game work...It´s time to change the cartridge slot...For the 5th time...That´s quality...

Never had a problem with the other Nintendo consoles...But hooking it up (NES) to play Super C and Ninja Gaiden 2 and taking almost 30 minutes to make it work...Sucks...
 
[quote name='mvega']It´s funny when people talk about the quality of Nintendo´s consoles...They seem to forget the NES ...ing PINK screen of death...

Almost half an hour to make a single game work...It´s time to change the cartridge slot...For the 5th time...That´s quality...

Never had a problem with the other Nintendo consoles...But hooking it up (NES) to play Super C and Ninja Gaiden 2 and taking almost 30 minutes to make it work...Sucks...[/QUOTE]

Good points, but even though most NES consoles ended up having problems, it didn't occur for a long time and could *usually* be avoided if you never blew into your games. The moisture from your breath rusted out the connectors, which were admittedly crappy to begin with. The major flaw in the NES was its front-loading design. It was a dust magnet, leading to weak connections and people blowing into the system and games. Did anyone have a FamiCom? How was the failure rate of that, since it was a toploader?

One thing I'll always find weird about that is the Nintendo tech support that had me start rubbing the cartridges back and forth in the deck and popping it up and down, up and down... what was that doing exactly? I'd think it was degrading the connectors even further, but it usually got things going.

A big difference for me in the durability argument is that Nintendo definitely learned their lesson. My SNES works just the same as the day I bought it, and my N64 used to drop 4 feet off my entertainment center while playing games and not skip a beat. The Gamecube has had more problems than either of those two, but you can only be so durable with a disc-based system.

Meanwhile I went through two PS1 systems; most of my friends had theirs flipped upside down. My PS2 was starting to show signs of death staved off only by HDLoader, but others were definitely not so lucky. MS had their Thompson drive fiasco and now their issues are even worse. DRE has happened so much that pretty much any gamer will be able to tell you what that acronym stands for. That's just crazy.
 
My SNES, original Gameboy, N64 and Gamecube all work fine.

I'm on my second PS2.

The consumer base should not accept shoddy hardware, how many 80 dollar VCRs last for 20 years? If a system is going to cost 300 and up, it better at least last for that long. Sony and MS are not really hip to the longevity factor.

I don't have an XBox or 360, but I'd get a 360 if it got some exclusive platformers and RPGs, a cheaper price, and some increased reliability.
 
I have almost every system since NES. None have went on me. I had the 360 since laucnh and it worked fine until the other day. I dont hate my purchase. So far i'm pretty happy with it. But I think Microsoft has made some mistakes so far and I think the system was rushed out. Not saying I agree with IGN or anything. They bash whatever they are paid to bash. I don't listen to anything any of them have to say. Site is good for news that's it.
 
[quote name='mvega']It´s funny when people talk about the quality of Nintendo´s consoles...They seem to forget the NES ...ing PINK screen of death...

Almost half an hour to make a single game work...It´s time to change the cartridge slot...For the 5th time...That´s quality...

Never had a problem with the other Nintendo consoles...But hooking it up (NES) to play Super C and Ninja Gaiden 2 and taking almost 30 minutes to make it work...Sucks...[/QUOTE]

Your point would be really well taken... if we hopped into a time machine and went back 20 fucking years.

[quote name='thamaster24']I know I can't count on any company for ALL games, and ALL systems to give good postive and negative coverage to each, but this isn't the first negative article from IGN about 360, do any of you remember the article 10 Reasons to wait for the PS3?[/QUOTE]

And did you know that article was put together by the IGN PS3 team? And do you remember the 10 reasons to buy a 360 article that appeared around the same time?
 
bread's done
Back
Top