Inolerance kills. Hate kills.

ZOHMIGAWD!

All Christians are terrorists! We should drag those bible thumpers into the street and kill them!!!!!!!


:roll:
 
"When ye meet the unbelievers, smite at their necks. Those who are slain in the way of Allah – he will never let their deeds be lost." Surah 47:4​
 
[quote name='Scrubking']
"When ye meet the unbelievers, smite at their necks. Those who are slain in the way of Allah – he will never let their deeds be lost." Surah 47:4​




[/QUOTE]But God will smash the heads of his enemies, crushing the skulls of those who love their guilty ways. The Lord says, "I will bring my enemies down from Bashan; I will bring them up from the depths of the sea. You, my people, will wash your feet in their blood, and even your dogs will get their share!"(Psalms 68:21-23 NLT)
 
[quote name='camoor']But God will smash the heads of his enemies, crushing the skulls of those who love their guilty ways. The Lord says, "I will bring my enemies down from Bashan; I will bring them up from the depths of the sea. You, my people, will wash your feet in their blood, and even your dogs will get their share!"(Psalms 68:21-23 NLT)[/QUOTE]

Which is, of course a threat from God. Not a call for man to do God's work for him.

Forgot that little bit of context didn't you?

Whereas the Koran calls for the followers of Islam to do the bidding of Satan. As Mohammed was a prophet of the devil, not of God.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Which is, of course a threat from God. Not a call for man to do God's work for him.

Forgot that little bit of context didn't you?

Whereas the Koran calls for the followers of Islam to do the bidding of Satan. As Mohammed was a prophet of the devil, not of God.[/QUOTE]

While the Israelites were camped at Acacia, some of the men defiled themselves by sleeping with the local Moabite women. These women invited them to attend sacrifices to their gods, and soon the Israelites were feasting with them and worshiping the gods of Moab. Before long Israel was joining in the worship of Baal of Peor, causing the LORD's anger to blaze against his people. The LORD issued the following command to Moses: "Seize all the ringleaders and execute them before the LORD in broad daylight, so his fierce anger will turn away from the people of Israel." So Moses ordered Israel's judges to execute everyone who had joined in worshiping Baal of Peor. Just then one of the Israelite men brought a Midianite woman into the camp, right before the eyes of Moses and all the people, as they were weeping at the entrance of the Tabernacle. When Phinehas son of Eleazar and grandson of Aaron the priest saw this, he jumped up and left the assembly. Then he took a spear and rushed after the man into his tent. Phinehas thrust the spear all the way through the man's body and into the woman's stomach. So the plague against the Israelites was stopped, but not before 24,000 people had died. (Numbers 25:1-9 NLT)
 
I love how everyone thinks that Judaism and Christianity are so peace loving and innocent but wasn't one of their prophets (abraham) ready to kill his own child just cause some voice in his head, that he thought was a god, told him to?

So basically, someone tries to kill their kid way back when, they're a prophet. Many people have done so in modern times, they're labeled crazy and thrown into prison or a mental hospital for the rest of their lives. Don't ya miss the good ol' days?
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Which is, of course a threat from God. Not a call for man to do God's work for him.

Forgot that little bit of context didn't you?

Whereas the Koran calls for the followers of Islam to do the bidding of Satan. As Mohammed was a prophet of the devil, not of God.[/QUOTE]

You love Salmon Rushdie don't you? Be honest you're really a more hateful and less understanding version of him right?
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Which is, of course a threat from God. Not a call for man to do God's work for him.

Forgot that little bit of context didn't you?

Whereas the Koran calls for the followers of Islam to do the bidding of Satan. As Mohammed was a prophet of the devil, not of God.[/QUOTE]

If god is telling is threatening to kill people, isn't that something of a concern? Or is god always good, so therefore if he kills million it must be a good thing.
 
[quote name='RedvsBlue']I love how everyone thinks that Judaism and Christianity are so peace loving and innocent but wasn't one of their prophets (moses) ready to kill his own child just cause some voice in his head, that he thought was a god, told him to?

So basically, someone tries to kill their kid way back when, they're a prophet. Many people have done so in modern times, they're labeled crazy and thrown into prison or a mental hospital for the rest of their lives. Don't ya miss the good ol' days?[/QUOTE]

Kierkegaard (one of the fathers of existentialism) writes an excellent essay on Abraham, Isaac, and the paradox of faith.

Of course there is always the problem of identifing who the supreme god is - where is the objective proof that the voice in Dubya's head is the supreme god, and what about the gods that are talking to all the other religious fanatics?
 
[quote name='camoor']While the Israelites were camped at Acacia, some of the men defiled themselves by sleeping with the local Moabite women. These women invited them to attend sacrifices to their gods, and soon the Israelites were feasting with them and worshiping the gods of Moab. Before long Israel was joining in the worship of Baal of Peor, causing the LORD's anger to blaze against his people. The LORD issued the following command to Moses: "Seize all the ringleaders and execute them before the LORD in broad daylight, so his fierce anger will turn away from the people of Israel." So Moses ordered Israel's judges to execute everyone who had joined in worshiping Baal of Peor. Just then one of the Israelite men brought a Midianite woman into the camp, right before the eyes of Moses and all the people, as they were weeping at the entrance of the Tabernacle. When Phinehas son of Eleazar and grandson of Aaron the priest saw this, he jumped up and left the assembly. Then he took a spear and rushed after the man into his tent. Phinehas thrust the spear all the way through the man's body and into the woman's stomach. So the plague against the Israelites was stopped, but not before 24,000 people had died. (Numbers 25:1-9 NLT)[/QUOTE]

What, were you pissed off that the initial biblical text was taken out of context?

You won't find me quoting or defending scripture for the purposes of debate.

Good job on the old college try though.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Which is, of course a threat from God. Not a call for man to do God's work for him.

Forgot that little bit of context didn't you?[/QUOTE]

[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']You won't find me ... defending scripture for the purposes of debate.[/QUOTE]

:lol:
 
You laugh because you can't comprehend English?

You're the one that can't read my friend. You take a quote that has nothing to do with man doing God's work and say "OMG OMG LOOK HERE1!1!!! U R GOD IS TEH EV1L!1!11!!!" LOLOZLOZOLOLZOR!!! When it didn't even say that.

I mock you openly.
 
Anyone else find it ironic that camoor is on his soap box preaching about intolerance and hate coming from christianity towards others, yet he himself is basically as intolerant as possible when it comes to christianity, and I'd likely wager is not a big fan either?
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Of course. You can hate Christianity. Republicans. Conservatives. White males and heterosexuals as much as you want, no bag limit.[/QUOTE]

I want you to find me one person who hates heterosexuals (and not a sarcastic joke article).
 
It's a figure of speech, not a literal statement. However what does the derogatory term in GLBT circles "heteronormative" mean?

I also notice you fail to mention where prejudice against the other groups I mentioned fails to exist. Curious how you admit, by omission, that you're allowed to be as hostile to the other groups as you please without consequence.

Learn to deal with SARCASM you dumb fuck.
 
To be honest, I'm all for gay marriage and support whatever they want to do, however, there's a term that's frequently used by gay people that absolutely pisses me off. Ever hear the term "breeder"? I absolutely despise that phrase and how its used.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']It's a figure of speech, not a literal statement. However what does the derogatory term in GLBT circles "heteronormative" mean?

Learn to deal with SARCASM you dumb fuck.[/QUOTE]

Wow, angry are we? Besides, nowhere in that passage did you say anything that wasn't normal for you.

Though heteronormative is not derogatory if you had a clue of what it means. If you take a course in sociology you may encounter it, it simply refers to societies that express views where heterosexuality is the only normal form of sexuality. It is often used as a negative term for those societies, but that's like saying the term discrimination is a derogatory term instead of a term pointing out inequalities.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']It's a figure of speech, [/QUOTE]

lol lol lol

typical. Caught in a false statement, you hide in a pile of bullshit.
 
[quote name='Duo_Maxwell']Anyone else find it ironic that camoor is on his soap box preaching about intolerance and hate coming from christianity towards others, yet he himself is basically as intolerant as possible when it comes to christianity, and I'd likely wager is not a big fan either?[/QUOTE]

That's what makes coming here so fun. We get to see radical idiots in action and goad them on to more foolishness.

That's what this board is all about. Hearing idiots cry about tolerance while being completely intolerant, and watching them defend killers who only want to slit their throats and rape their mothers while demonizing the people who want to fight them and protect our country.
 
[quote name='usickenme']lol lol lol

typical. Caught in a false statement, you hide in a pile of bullshit.[/QUOTE]

I'm hiding in your living room???
 
[quote name='Scrubking']That's what makes coming here so fun. We get to see radical idiots in action and goad them on to more foolishness.

That's what this board is all about. Hearing idiots cry about tolerance while being completely intolerant, and watching them defend killers who only want to slit their throats and rape their mothers while demonizing the people who want to fight them and protect our country.[/QUOTE]

Umm..... it seems that you're only referring to liberals as radicals. Agree with him or not, it's impossible to label PAD as anything less than radical.
 
[quote name='Duo_Maxwell']Anyone else find it ironic that camoor is on his soap box preaching about intolerance and hate coming from christianity towards others, yet he himself is basically as intolerant as possible when it comes to christianity, and I'd likely wager is not a big fan either?[/QUOTE]

Being tolerant does not include tolerating intolerance. For example, I can be a tolerant individual and at the same time denounce the actions of Casto's Cuban government.

I am not "preaching about intolerance and hate coming from christianity towards others", I just thought it would be good for the conservatives of the board to think of all terrorists (white, black, brown, muslim, christian, athiest, etc) in the same light. After all, noone ever seems to call for the christian church to denounce the latest abortion bombing, all things being equal this is the first thing I'd expect PAD to be screaming about the next day. This was a little shock treatment, judging by the reaction I hit a nerve.
 
You know, the lot of you pointing fingers and screaming "Christian hater!" are lying to yourselves. Most of the arguments here are NOT (for added effect, if you're dense ---NOT) about hating christianity.

Many of those, including myself, I'm sure, who bring up problems within the christian religion merely seek to point out that extremists exist in many ways, shapes, and forms. In addition, they should not be considered to be representative of the whole. Just as Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols et al. are not representative of the entirety of the Republican party, and instead only a select radical flank of the whole, the muslims who are associated with al-qaeda are radicals and not representative of the whole. Fred Phelps? Radical.

Christianity is a convenient comparison because it is, like Islam, a religion (and an Abrahamic one at that, making the comparison even better, right?). The intent of the OP, I can say with great certainty, is not "fuck you, jebus! you suck and mohammed rules!!!"

The point is that all religions are equally valid (or useless, depending on your disposition), and all religions offer freaks, mutants, weirdos, and peopl who just make shit up on the spot, many of whom can be dangerous. Furthermore, if you only select one religion to actively advocate the entire decimation of based on those radicals, you're being intellectually lazy, as well as inherently contradictory (since you aren't in favor of killing all Catholics or Republicans as well).

If you can't tell the difference between a Muslim terrorist and a Muslim citizen, how can you tell the difference between a Christian terrorist (how about Eric Rudolph if the OP's cite doesn't suit your fancy, or Randall Terry?) and a Christian citizen? Can you tell the difference between a Republican terrorist (McVeigh) and a Republican citizen?

The point has nothing to do with religion, and, as you continue to focus solely on that, you're keeping the dialogue at a base level which allows you to escape unfettered without having to deal with your laziness, your hatred, and your contradictory and religiously preferential lifestyles.
 
[quote name='Scrubking']That's what makes coming here so fun. We get to see radical idiots in action and goad them on to more foolishness.

That's what this board is all about. Hearing idiots cry about tolerance while being completely intolerant, and watching them defend killers who only want to slit their throats and rape their mothers while demonizing the people who want to fight them and protect our country.[/QUOTE]

Will you ever bring anything to the conversation on the vs. boards, or are you going to remain a cheerleader since your pitiful attempts at substantive arguments have been consistently rendered impotent at best?

Say hellp to sexy sexy ScrubKing!
cheerleader.jpg


It's your pick, kiddo. Cheerleader or Chickenhawk. Although, full disclosure, you just might become head of your local Republican chapter if you continue to champion the war from the comfort of your suburban home, all the while coming up with dreadfully poor excuses for not going.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']
The point has nothing to do with religion, and, as you continue to focus solely on that, you're keeping the dialogue at a base level which allows you to escape unfettered without having to deal with your laziness, your hatred, and your contradictory and religiously preferential lifestyles.[/QUOTE]

:roll: Thats exactly what I knew a liberal wacko like you would say. Sure, try and dress it up as logic and comparisons, but we all know you hate the jews! You're an antisemite! That means you had teh buttsechz with Hitler!!!!!!!!!!!!! Zomigawd!
:roll: Thats exactly what I knew a liberal wacko like you would say. Sure, try and dress it up as logic and comparisons, but we all know you hate the jews! You're an antisemite! That means you had teh buttsechz with Hitler!!!!!!!!!!!!! Zomigawd!
Click to expand...
:applause:
There, now neither PAD nor Scrub need to respond.
 
[quote name='vienge']Kill 'em all and let God sort them out.

Muslims that is.[/QUOTE]

Catharism was a religious movement with Gnostic elements that originated around the middle of the 10th century, branded by the contemporary Roman Catholic Church as heretical.
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathar

In the 13th century under the authority of Pope Innocent III, it was ordered that France be cleansed of the Cathar heresy by a crusade. The town of Beziers was besieged, but the citizens of the town, 99% Catholic, refused to surrender the few Cathars amongst them. When the town fell, the leader of the crusader army asked advice from Arnaud-Armaury, the Abbot of Citeaux as to how to identify the heretics. He answered "Kill them all. God will know his own." All 20,000 residents of the town were slaughtered, including perhaps 200 Cathars
Click to expand...
http://www.apatheticagnostic.com/articles/meds/med02/med034.html

To be true to your sentiment, are we killing non-catholic christians now too?
 
[quote name='camoor']To be true to your sentiment, are we killing non-catholic christians now too?[/QUOTE]

You know, although I'm pretty much an apostate in the Catholic church, I still have some of the Virgin Mary fetishizing that I learned as a child. I'm considering my next major tattoo project to be a "Lady of Guadalupe"-esque image on my inner forearm

pl02a.jpg


Who knew there could be such functionality in that idea for me? When the crusades come through, they'll stop me and say, "no. not him, he's a Catholic."

Works better than a scapular! Awesome!
 
How come we always hear stories about Christian terrorists and Muslim terrorists? Where are all the Buddhist terrorists?

Anyone who judges someone based on their religion only are fuckers. I have a Muslim friend who is the nicest and sweetest person I've ever met and I would trust her with my life. I also have a lot of Christian and Catholic friends...just because someone is born into a certain religion or as a certain race does not make them killers or inferior in any way.

Oh well, kinda reminds me of how people accused my parents when they first came to the US of killing their brothers/husbands/fathers...

Okay, so some Muslim terrorists killed Americans. If this means that all Muslims should be killed, the same would go for Germans and Japanese for what they during WW2. Also, shouldn't all Americans be killed for supporting the Indonesian government in its killing of over a million innocent lives? What about how England colonized Burma and India and killed a lot of innocent people? And how America colonized the Philipines and killed those poor people who were only trying to protect their country? Oh, and what about how Americans dropped atomic bombs on innocent people in Japan? Sure, it was a "last resort" and justified because it helped end the war, but how about how the US were the ones who supported Saddam Hussein's rise to power in the first place at the cost of innocent lives? Iraquis are using the same argument in their attacks against Americans. If we keep trying to take vengeance against a whole group of people of whom a minority have done ill against us, we might as well apply that principle to other historical events and kill off most of the world. Hey, that might solve the population problem we're having...
 
[quote name='vietgurl']How come we always hear stories about Christian terrorists and Muslim terrorists? Where are all the Buddhist terrorists?[/QUOTE]

I remember watching a documentary on tibetans still living in tibet and those who fled to india. Many youths were idolizing palestinian militants. Here's some articles mentioning it:

Diplomatic sources said that the Dalai Lama understands that the Chinese cannot move on his proposal quickly because of the many layers of central authority in Beijing, but in his first clearest warning, he has told overseas Chinese interlocutors that he cannot indefinitely put down growing Tibetan militancy, and that China would lose a chance if it did not act now.
Click to expand...

http://www.indiareacts.com/nati2.asp?recno=3291&ctg=Policy

On the Tibetan side, there is some indication of a growing militancy among younger Tibetans. "This generation," one analyst writes, "has grown up under Chinese rule, is no longer familiar with traditional Tibet, and does not necessarily orient its activities to values such as peaceful opposition" (Heberer, 1995:307). These militants reject the Dalai Lama's insistence on nonviolence and even question his political leadership. When, for example, the Dalai Lama offered what he called "the middle way" of domestic autonomy, but not sovereignty, for Tibet, not only did China reject the proposal as "a disguised form of independence" but younger Tibetans urged that he support an armed insurgency
Click to expand...

http://www.dushkin.com/connectext/wpold/ch6/infp7.mhtml

Although there have been a number of bombing incidents in Tibet both before and since, 1996 was the year when the Chinese authorities finally acknowledged they were happening. On 13 January1996 a bomb exploded in Sog County in Nagchu, northern Tibet, damaging two shops. A young monk in India later claimed responsibilty, saying that it was a protest against China’s imposition of its own choice of boy as the reincarnation of the Panchen Lama, as well as against migration by Chinese Muslims.
On 18 January 1996 a bomb exploded at the house of Sengchen Lobsang Gyaltsen, a lama and political collaborator who led the pro-Chinese faction in the dispute over the Panchen Lama; one person was said to have been injured.


On 18 March 1996 another bomb went off outside the Tibet headquarters in Lhasa of the Chinese Communist Party, the sixth reported explosion in nine months, and the first clearly political target in the series. On 11 May 1996 the authorities admitted for the first time that bombs had gone off in Tibet. They blamed “the Dalai clique” but gave no details. Nine days later, on 20 May 1996, they announced that they would “resolutely crack down on cases of explosion and assassination” as part of the “Strike Hard” campaign which had been launched in Lhasa earlier that month.
Click to expand...

http://www.tibetnews.com/bulletin/98Issue3/page6.html
 
Buddhist terrorist? You're kidding right? What would they do, wish bad karma upon a city? Buddhists are the most aggressive lot.
 
[quote name='vietgurl']How come we always hear stories about Christian terrorists and Muslim terrorists? Where are all the Buddhist terrorists?[/QUOTE]

Actually, the Aum Shinrikyo cultists who attacked the Japanese subway system with Sarin nerve gas a couple years back were/are technically Buddhists, I believe.
 
[quote name='thisiswack']I hate inolerance so much[/QUOTE]

I guess one would say your are intolerant of intolerance. Which makes you......A COMMUNIST...err, HYPOCRITE! Either one is fine. ;)
 
Reality's Fringe said:
I guess one would say your are intolerant of intolerance. Which makes you......A COMMUNIST...err, HYPOCRITE! Either one is fine. ;)
Click to expand...

I believe that he was trying to point out the lack of a t in the 'intolerance' in the title ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top