Kitty-killer label litters Frist resume for president

alonzomourning23

CAGiversary!
Feedback
26 (100%)
There's a potential pothole in U.S. Sen. Bill Frist's road to the White House: He's a confessed kitty killer.

He fessed up in his 1989 book, "Transplant," to adopting cats from shelters when he was in medical school, treating them like pets for a while, and then using them in his research experiments. Maybe in hindsight, Trent Lott should have seen it coming.

To his credit, the future senator wrote that it was a "heinous and dishonest thing to do."

Last week, Frist started shopping around a new memoir to New York and Tennessee publishers. Here's the burning question: How will he spin the cat tale?

It came up in Tennessee's 1994 Republican primary, when Frist faced five opponents for the nomination. It was Chattanooga's Bob Corker (he's in a similar cat fight for Frist's seat now) who tried to inflame the feline furor. Corker sent beef-and-bacon-flavored

9 Lives Cat Treats to reporters and put out a press release saying Frist had lost the Garfield vote.

It was a short-lived local story that briefly flared in the national press. Yes, what Frist did was odd and rather icky, but he also saved a lot of lives as a heart surgeon. The kitty killer charges were widely dismissed, and Frist won the primary.

But running a national race is a different animal from running a statewide one. He'd better have an answer ready on the cat thing before he can even think about winning the GOP nomination. Running for president requires candidates to dump out their underwear drawer for all to see, answer questions about what color eye shadow their prom date wore, and explain any cross word ever said to their dry cleaner.

In other words, it'll be brutal.

Bet Frist wishes now he'd refrained from giving out too much information in his first book. He made his case in "Transplant" for saving lives by learning through experiments with animals while at Harvard. It's the part where he kept them as pets first that is bothersome.

"Desperate, obsessed with my work, I visited the various animal shelters in the Boston suburbs, collecting cats, taking them home, treating them as pets for a few days, then carting them off to the lab to die in the interests of science. And medicine. And health care. And treatment of disease. And my project.

"It was, of course, a heinous and dishonest thing to do, and I was totally schizoid about the entire matter. By day, I was little Billy Frist, the boy who lived on Bowling Avenue in Nashville and had decided to become a doctor because of his gentle father and a dog named Scratchy. By night, I was Dr. William Harrison Frist, future cardiothoracic surgeon, who was not going to let a few sentiments about cute, furry little creatures stand in the way of his career. In short, I was going a little crazy."

Frist recently commented about the power he felt when holding the last beats of a dog's heart in his hand. Good thing little Scratchy had a decent hiding place while Frist was in med school.

This will be media catnip. Think of the potential for protests and endorsements. A "Saturday Night Live" skit would be a no-brainer: "Toonces, look out! It's the kitty-killing gentlemen from the state of Tennessee!"
Maybe Frist should title his coming memoir "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof."

Because, as Big Daddy would say, there's great potential here for mendacity. And he better get ready to dance on some hot shingles.

http://tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060612/COLUMNIST0101/606120346/1092/NEWS

I'm pretty sure that he could be sued for this, considering you have to sign a contract not to harm the animal when you adopt an animal in massachusetts. You also must agree to return it to the humane society if you are unable to care for it.

I know laws were different in the 70's, but in the 60's my mother adopted a dog at a shelter against the advice of the guy running it. They later found out the reason he didn't want her to take it was that he was going to sell the dog to a research lab and he used his shelter as a means to get animals he could sell for research. He got arrested for that. So I assume there had to be a legal aspect to fraudulently obtaining cats to kill.
 
"It was, of course, a heinous and dishonest thing to do, and I was totally schizoid about the entire matter. By day, I was little Billy Frist, the boy who lived on Bowling Avenue in Nashville and had decided to become a doctor because of his gentle father and a dog named Scratchy. By night, I was Dr. William Harrison Frist, future cardiothoracic surgeon, who was not going to let a few sentiments about cute, furry little creatures stand in the way of his career. In short, I was going a little crazy."

He sounds like a serial killer when discussing his two personas.
 
[quote name='fart_bubble']This isn't too bad as reserchers do this all the time.[/quote]

Well, I don't like that either. But they don't go to animal shelters and fraudulently adopt animals as pets and then kill them.

They also don't make comments like this:
Frist recently commented about the power he felt when holding the last beats of a dog's heart in his hand.

This seems like something he enjoyed. It's also illegal though.
 
I love how he and the article's writer seem to try to justify it
It was a short-lived local story that briefly flared in the national press. Yes, what Frist did was odd and rather icky, but he also saved a lot of lives as a heart surgeon. The kitty killer charges were widely dismissed, and Frist won the primary.

...

Bet Frist wishes now he'd refrained from giving out too much information in his first book. He made his case in "Transplant" for saving lives by learning through experiments with animals while at Harvard. It's the part where he kept them as pets first that is bothersome.

I'm pretty sure there's thousands of heart surgeons out there who are very excellent at their jobs and didn't use kitties as experiments. Hell, he was going to Harvard medical school, and he couldn't learn from them?!?!?
 
It depends on when he grabbed the cats. I might be off on this but its a week or so when shelters put animals down, so if he grabbed them just before they went to sleep, I don't see a huge problem with this.
 
[quote name='fart_bubble']It depends on when he grabbed the cats. I might be off on this but its a week or so when shelters put animals down, so if he grabbed them just before they went to sleep, I don't see a huge problem with this.[/quote]

They don't have particular week for that. And they don't tell you whether they're going to kill them, the only way you'd know is if you asked. There's no reason to believe he did. Even then, it's the difference between a painless death and whatever this guy decided to do with them.
 
[quote name='fart_bubble']It depends on when he grabbed the cats. I might be off on this but its a week or so when shelters put animals down, so if he grabbed them just before they went to sleep, I don't see a huge problem with this.[/QUOTE]


Not every animal shelter puts down animals. There's a few in MN here that don't euthanize any animals unless they are too sick. Otherwise they will stay in the shelter until they are adopted out.
 
" Frist recently commented about the power he felt when holding the last beats of a dog's heart in his hand."

I sure hope that there is a special place in hell set aside for this douche.
 
As for suing him, I'm sure the statute of limitations has kicked in since this was 30 years ago, so that's probably out.

The article is spot on that this will be closely examined in the primary at some point, and even more so if he wins it.
 
If he runs I'm going to have to open a cafepress shop selling bumper stickers with "vote kitty killer in '08" on them.

Stuff like this is damaging not for the legality or whether people agree with animal testing or not, it's the likability factor. Most people, especially people with cats as pets, wouldn't be too thrilled to find out someone adopted cats as pets and then cut em up.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']If he runs I'm going to have to open a cafepress shop selling bumper stickers with "vote kitty killer in '08" on them.[/quote]

It will probably work as well as "Vote for Drunk Drivers in '04"
 
[quote name='camoor']It will probably work as well as "Vote for Drunk Drivers in '04"[/quote]

Yes, because drunk driving is such a rarity and no one ever does it.

Drunk driving, illegal, dangerous and everything else, is something many can identify with because many have done it. There's nothing particularly odd about it so long as you're not doing it anymore.

But, I don't think most people can identify with someone going to shelters and adopting pet cats to cut up. Clinton used mittens to help him campaign, presidents routinely get dogs to boost there likability factor, to make them seem more normal. Frist? He cut up kitties and ripped out a dog heart. It doesn't scream everyman.

The idea of bush being stupid, drinker etc. it stuck but no one cared. The trick here is getting it to stick.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']Yes, because drunk driving is such a rarity and no one ever does it.

Drunk driving, illegal, dangerous and everything else, is something many can identify with because many have done it. There's nothing particularly odd about it so long as you're not doing it anymore.

But, I don't think most people can identify with someone going to shelters and adopting pet cats to cut up. Clinton used mittens to help him campaign, presidents routinely get dogs to boost there likability factor, to make them seem more normal. Frist? He cut up kitties and ripped out a dog heart. It doesn't scream everyman.

The idea of bush being stupid, drinker etc. it stuck but no one cared. The trick here is getting it to stick.[/quote]

We can only hope. But the right has that whole hard-core double standard working - Kerry got screwed for being a veteran who decried a bad war, but the costume-happy draft-dodging pro-war Bush and Cheney team were given a pass.

The "culture of life" usually doesn't give a damn about anything but human life (in all of it's broken, twisted, hooked-up-to-frankenstein-machine brain-dead forms) - if you think any different just look at how many inhumanely raised animals those porkers stuff down their gullets as they laugh about the "fictions" of global warming, decreasing animal habitats, and chemical pesticide contamination.
 
[quote name='camoor']The "culture of life" usually doesn't give a damn about anything but human life...[/QUOTE]

You forgot the phrase 'non-poor'
 
[quote name='camoor']We can only hope. But the right has that whole hard-core double standard working - Kerry got screwed for being a veteran who decried a bad war, but the costume-happy draft-dodging pro-war Bush and Cheney team were given a pass.

The "culture of life" usually doesn't give a damn about anything but human life (in all of it's broken, twisted, hooked-up-to-frankenstein-machine brain-dead forms) - if you think any different just look at how many inhumanely raised animals those porkers stuff down their gullets as they laugh about the "fictions" of global warming, decreasing animal habitats, and chemical pesticide contamination.[/QUOTE]

QFT.
 
I wonder if he ever ate any of his test subjects. You know, to absorb their strength.

And because it's damn good. Mmmmm.... kitten heart.
 
bread's done
Back
Top