Obama illegally attempts to fire AmeriCorps inspector general

[quote name='Sarang01']Koggit how the fuck can you not look at the Hate Brief or hear about it and not be infuriated, Gay or not?![/QUOTE]
obama is not his administration, it's beyond ignorant to call the president of our country a "just one massive sack of shit" because you dislike the wording in a DoJ brief.

even if obama was his administration, even if he hand-wrote the DoJ brief: nothing distinguishes those relationships from any other relationship, aside from societal acceptance. DOMA should be repealed for sure, i vehemently disagree with the DoJ's stance on the issue, but the wording in the brief was fine and the rationale behind citing those cases was reasonable.

so, learn: blame goes in the blame hole, blame comes from blame trees
 
[quote name='Sarang01']Let's not forget the Hate Brief from the Obama Administration that defended DOMA since it was law and likened Gay's or Gay sex to Pedophilia and Incest.
Oh and then the slap in the face to the Gay government employees afterwards with a MEMORANDUM, note that word, that it was NOT an Executive Order, that Gays would get Long Term care insurance as well as moving expenses and one other thing that was minimal paid for. Keep in mind with the Long Term care insurance you're fucked possibly when he's out of office since it's a memorandum, not even an Executive Order.
Obama is just one massive sack of shit that most have woken up to except for the most diehard of the Democrats who don't care what he does since he's got a D by his name. Call them Obamabots, call them what you will, the bottom line is those people are almost as BAD as the Bush defenders. The only reason I say almost is how rabid they are for National Healthcare. Past that you're complete crap. I mean how can anyone have their head up their asses so much?
Depascal I hate to break it to you but the Americorp bit is the Spies of "1984" or the Nazi Youth Group in my opinion. Pick whichever example you wish to use.
Frankly with Obama I'm surprised no one has mentioned impeachment yet with the way he's spending money. If he doesn't get those "Audit the Fed" bills signed when they come by his desk he needs his ass booted out of office. Yeah I said it. He seems arrogant enough to do whatever the fuck he wants. Oh and by the way, take your fucking face off the tube. I can't imagine most people are enamored with you swatting a fly.
Seriously when will the media STOP licking this guy's balls, playing catch, doing the wet and wild water slide or licking up Hershey bits?[/QUOTE]

Were you actually having a heart attack when you wrote this? Calm down, man.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Elaborate on this argument and defend it.

You can start with the easy one: defend that the 2nd amendment is "barely there anymore."

This oughta be fun...[/QUOTE]

1st: HR 1966 Megan Meier Cyberbullying bill. Would make free speech on the internet illegal. The DHS reports that say conservatives are terrorists. Protesting is "low level terrorism" in defense department reports.
http://www.aclu.org/images/general/asset_upload_file89_39820.pdf
"Free speech zones" at the RNC, DNC, and such. The list goes on and on.
2nd: Rahm Emanuel's no fly no buy idea.
4th: The Patriot Act, FISA, Warrantless Wiretaping, etc.
5th: Gitmo, rendetion, eminent domain abuses, etc.
6th: Gitmo, Patriot Act, rendetion, No Fly List, Miranda Rights are gone http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE54P47120090526
7th: Gitmo, Patriot Act, ect.
8th: Gitmo, torture, etc.
10th: Almost everything Congress, does these days, under the tenth amendment should be done by the states.

[quote name='depascal22']I agree with you on the first part. The only way to fix it at this point is straight up revolution.

The second part still confuses me. Everyone keep attributing fascist (and therefore radical right wing) ideology to the president because he wants people to serve their country. Is he a socialist or a fascist? Please make up your mind.

Many other countries have conscripted service and they don't live under fascist dictatorships. Israel has mandatory service and the people seem to be doing fine in the face of overwhelming odds.

You guys keep acting like every young adult is going to be checking IDs on the corner with a rifle in hand. You act like actually serving your country is such a bummer and you have better things to do. Maybe if more people had to go serve in a war, we wouldn't have rushed into one.[/QUOTE]

This country isn't turning into a socialist country, if anything its turning into a facist country. The people in power all think that we should sacrifice our rights, for fake security, from the terrorists. Then we bailout the companies that are "too big to fail." Both of these are tenets of Fascism. The problem with Obama's national security force isn't the conscripted service, so much as what they will be doing. If you look at DOD Directive 1404.10, issued by Obama on January 23, 2009, it says some things the national security force will be doing.
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/140410p.pdf
in situations where other civilians may be evacuated
to assist military forces where the use of DoD civilians is appropriate. These employees shall be
collectively known as the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce.
Members of the DoD
Civilian Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped, and ready to
deploy in support of combat operations by the military; contingencies; emergency operations;
humanitarian missions; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability
operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoDD 3000.05
Click to expand...
This sounds to me like this national security force, that is just as powerful, just as strong, and just as well funded as the military, is going to be in combat, and more than likely martial law. This directive prepares for martial law, which will be partly run by the national security force.
 
[quote name='xycury']Not that young, but when others were in office, I couldn't vote or paid attention. Plus who's names would those be? Wouldn't have Bush been compared to those then?[/QUOTE]

Try Jimmy Carter for starters. Disliked by most and booted out after one term.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top