http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1312/
Essentially, big storm, gonna kill CA, not sure when.
In terms of public policy, this is kind of fascinating. Precedence states that when the state can't handle the emergency, the governor asks for federal aid and typically receives something. On other hand, we're talking Katrina^10 with this CA Storm.
Essentially, big storm, gonna kill CA, not sure when.
The ARkStorm has several public policy implications: (1) An ARkStorm raises serious questions about the ability of existing federal, state, and local disaster planning to handle a disaster of this magnitude. (2) A core policy issue raised is whether to pay now to mitigate, or pay a lot more later for recovery. (3) Innovative financing solutions are likely to be needed to avoid fiscal crisis and adequately fund response and recovery costs from a similar, real, disaster. (4) Responders and government managers at all levels could be encouraged to conduct risk assessments, and devise the full spectrum of exercises, to exercise ability of their plans to address a similar event. (5) ARkStorm can be a reference point for application of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and California Emergency Management Agency guidance connecting federal, state and local natural hazards mapping and mitigation planning under the National Flood Insurance Plan and Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. (6) Common messages to educate the public about the risk of such an extreme disaster as the ARkStorm scenario could be developed and consistently communicated to facilitate policy formulation and transformation.
In terms of public policy, this is kind of fascinating. Precedence states that when the state can't handle the emergency, the governor asks for federal aid and typically receives something. On other hand, we're talking Katrina^10 with this CA Storm.