So the Duggars are expecting number 19

[quote name='camoor']Regardless I feel bad for their neighbors. It can't be pleasant to live next to people like the Duggars.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, me too. Though I agree with UncleBob that there are many worse kinds of neighbors.

I lucked out with my current condo complex. I've been here a month and a half or so, and haven't seen a single kid yet. Seems like mostly young professionals and a few older, retirement age folks. So no kids, and no loud college parties etc.
 
I grew up in the boonies and hated it. So I'm a big city person through and through now. Key is to just find quiet neighborhoods, and well insulated condos etc. so you never hear your neighbors.
 
[quote name='thrustbucket']That's why my aim is to buy a house in the boonies. I can't stand neighbors pretty much ever.[/QUOTE]

You're supposed to be moving OUT of the country, not INTO it.

I need my tropical bug out location.
 
[quote name='depascal22']Because you're a fucking retard that needs to be beaten down just so you know which way is up. You started this conversation by saying that people that supported the family MUST be against families that can't support more children. For you it was an either or with a definate winner. Now that you got soundly beaten, you wanna walk away and act like I'm the one that has to have competition. God forbid a vs. argument actually come out with a winner. I guess it's just the conservative way of thinking that once you get whipped like a slave you go find other arguments that you can win and act like you never got your ass whipped.[/QUOTE]

:lol::lol::lol:

forget your meds?
 
[quote name='perdition(troy']:lol::lol::lol:

forget your meds?[/QUOTE]

He has a grain of truth there.

It is kind of like how you made a few posts posing as an expert because you "work" in a hospital and then clammed up when it came out you didn't know the first thing about how hospitals with packed ERs will divert ambulances.

This was after you stated you had no problem with children dying for lack of medical care.
 
I don't remember ever posting that I was an expert, or anything even regarding diverting ambulances. Sorry I don't check this board religiously, I probably missed that part of the conversation.

And when did I post that I don't mind if kids die because of no healthcare lolol. You got jokes, I'll give you that.
 
[quote name='perdition(troy']I don't remember ever posting that I was an expert[/quote]

Sure you don't.

I mean that would be a completely erroneous thing to think after someone pretends to know what they are talking about because they claim to "work" in a hospital a few dozen times.

or anything even regarding diverting ambulances.
Click to expand...

You were sure enough before to claim it doesn't happen.

Sorry I don't check this board religiously, I probably missed that part of the conversation.
Click to expand...

Either that or you have an incredibly (seemingly convenient) faulty memory.

And when did I post that I don't mind if kids die because of no healthcare
Click to expand...

See above.

You did, I wasn't the only one who saw/commented on it.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Sounds like I asked a question. Perhaps starting off with the word "question", then ending the post with one of those funny-looking question marks confused you.[/QUOTE]

Don't hide behind semantics. You know damn well that you're positing that people that are for big families that support themselves are against families that can't.
 
The funny thing is that I don't think individuals who can't support their children shouldn't have them.

Well, I mean, they *shouldn't*. You should plan, save and plan some more. Oh, and savings is good.

But I would not support any laws or restrictions on such a thing.

Now, I *would* support something (if done correctly) in regards to individuals who cannot support their families and A.) Abuse or Neglect their children or B.) Repeatedly require taxpayer-funded assistance while showing no signs of improvement over an extended period of time.

Obviously, such laws would need to be very clearly defined to leave no room for error...
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Obviously, such laws would need to be very clearly defined to leave no room for error...[/QUOTE]

And we all know that ain't happingin... :cough:CashforClunckers:cough:
 
[quote name='UncleBob']The funny thing is that I don't think individuals who can't support their children shouldn't have them.

Well, I mean, they *shouldn't*. You should plan, save and plan some more. Oh, and savings is good.

But I would not support any laws or restrictions on such a thing.

Now, I *would* support something (if done correctly) in regards to individuals who cannot support their families and A.) Abuse or Neglect their children or B.) Repeatedly require taxpayer-funded assistance while showing no signs of improvement over an extended period of time.

Obviously, such laws would need to be very clearly defined to leave no room for error...[/QUOTE]

Ladies and gentlemen.......John Kerry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top