Admiral Ackbar
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 25 (100%)
They have this new Afterwards program which I personally dislike on C-span. The reason being that it's antagonistic by placing two individuals with conflicting views to discuss a book. So you just have two people arguing in a circle for an hour. SO most of the time its pretty crappy.
But tonight they have Bill Press vs. Roy Moore. He's the judge who got in a judicial battle over the ten commandments in the courthouse. Now, I don't know necessarily where you may fall on the issue. But the man's logic is so torturous that I literally have questions about his mental health. I mean, he is W-A-C-K-O!
Like, he says that Laws should not be made to enfore Gods rule, and the next sentence he explains that's because the constitution is Gods law therefore it's implicitly defined. And he keeps running in circles about that point. And I'm like, Huh? Bill Press asked him about Hindu's and he goes, "Well, we're not based on the Hindu Law or Muslim Law. We're based on Gods Law." Now from a historical perspective he's correct. But trust me, in context he was saying, "Muslim and Hindu tradition are inferior to Christianity." If he just said it once I would give him a pass. But he goes over and over again pointing out that Christianity is superior. I'm paraphrasing some quotes here. "It's not the muslim God, it's God's Law," "I would be personaly opposed to putting a statue of the Buddah in the courthouse," "This is a christian nation who're purpose is to advance the christian faith."
Look, he may have a point about the ten commandments (I don't agree with him necessarily) but he is a loon
But tonight they have Bill Press vs. Roy Moore. He's the judge who got in a judicial battle over the ten commandments in the courthouse. Now, I don't know necessarily where you may fall on the issue. But the man's logic is so torturous that I literally have questions about his mental health. I mean, he is W-A-C-K-O!
Like, he says that Laws should not be made to enfore Gods rule, and the next sentence he explains that's because the constitution is Gods law therefore it's implicitly defined. And he keeps running in circles about that point. And I'm like, Huh? Bill Press asked him about Hindu's and he goes, "Well, we're not based on the Hindu Law or Muslim Law. We're based on Gods Law." Now from a historical perspective he's correct. But trust me, in context he was saying, "Muslim and Hindu tradition are inferior to Christianity." If he just said it once I would give him a pass. But he goes over and over again pointing out that Christianity is superior. I'm paraphrasing some quotes here. "It's not the muslim God, it's God's Law," "I would be personaly opposed to putting a statue of the Buddah in the courthouse," "This is a christian nation who're purpose is to advance the christian faith."
Look, he may have a point about the ten commandments (I don't agree with him necessarily) but he is a loon