RBM
CAGiversary!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4483949.stm
US military investigators have cleared American soldiers of any wrongdoing over the death of an Italian agent, who was shot at a checkpoint in Baghdad.
Nicola Calipari was killed by US forces as he travelled in a car near Baghdad airport after securing the release of Italian hostage Giuliana Sgrena. Ms Sgrena, who had been held by Iraqi kidnappers, was hurt in the incident.
The US soldiers were "not culpable" according to the US military report, which Italy has refused to endorse.
A US army official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Italian and US authorities still disagree over the speed at which the vehicle approached the checkpoint and how much communication there was between those in the car and the checkpoint guards. "The United States is ready to release the report but Italy has more questions," the official said.
The US military said the car carrying Mr Calipari was speeding as it approached the temporary checkpoint in western Baghdad. They claimed the soldiers used "hand and arm signals, flashing white lights and firing warning shots" to get the driver to stop.
However, Ms Sgrena, who had been held captive for more than a month, disputed this version of events, saying that the car had not been speeding and that there had been no warning before the troops opened fire.
Hailed as hero
The US military had also said they had no knowledge of the rescue mission, dismissing as "absurd" Ms Sgrena's suggestion that their troops may have deliberately targeted her car.
Just after the incident, in an interview with Sky Italia TV, she said it was possible the soldiers had targeted her because Washington opposed the policy of negotiating with kidnappers.
"The soldiers were only complying with the standard operating procedures for those checkpoints, so therefore are not culpable to dereliction of duty [charges]," the US army official told Reuters news agency.
"Everybody feels terrible about it. But given the climate and the security atmosphere, the security procedures at the checkpoint operations have to be run by the letter," he added.
The soldiers involved will face no disciplinary action.
Mr Calipari was fatally shot as he threw himself over Ms Sgrena to protect her from a hail of bullets.
******
Obviously, this is not the official statement, so details are lacking. However, it's disappointing to know that this is going to come down to a case of "Yes, you did" and "No, I didn't." I don't recall if the driver (or an occupant in the front passenger seat, if there was one) survived, and they make no mention of it, here. When an eyewitness in the middle of events gives contrary accounts to your own story, something's rotten in Denmark. All I can think of is that 1.) She's lying. 2.) She didn't see/hear the warnings from her position in the car and is mistaken 3.) She's being honest and is correct and the soldiers are lying. or 4.) The soldiers gave the warnings when the occupants of the vehicle couldn't see them, in which case it was a crummy place for a checkpoint. Regardless of how it happened, we don't seem to be handling this very politically. We could at least make some blatant show of making concessions to the Italian offiicals involved in the investigation (or just privvy to its findings,) to show that we want them to be satisfied with the official results...instead of ignoring their requests for further investigation and proceeding with an offiical conclusion.
US military investigators have cleared American soldiers of any wrongdoing over the death of an Italian agent, who was shot at a checkpoint in Baghdad.
Nicola Calipari was killed by US forces as he travelled in a car near Baghdad airport after securing the release of Italian hostage Giuliana Sgrena. Ms Sgrena, who had been held by Iraqi kidnappers, was hurt in the incident.
The US soldiers were "not culpable" according to the US military report, which Italy has refused to endorse.
A US army official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Italian and US authorities still disagree over the speed at which the vehicle approached the checkpoint and how much communication there was between those in the car and the checkpoint guards. "The United States is ready to release the report but Italy has more questions," the official said.
The US military said the car carrying Mr Calipari was speeding as it approached the temporary checkpoint in western Baghdad. They claimed the soldiers used "hand and arm signals, flashing white lights and firing warning shots" to get the driver to stop.
However, Ms Sgrena, who had been held captive for more than a month, disputed this version of events, saying that the car had not been speeding and that there had been no warning before the troops opened fire.
Hailed as hero
The US military had also said they had no knowledge of the rescue mission, dismissing as "absurd" Ms Sgrena's suggestion that their troops may have deliberately targeted her car.
Just after the incident, in an interview with Sky Italia TV, she said it was possible the soldiers had targeted her because Washington opposed the policy of negotiating with kidnappers.
"The soldiers were only complying with the standard operating procedures for those checkpoints, so therefore are not culpable to dereliction of duty [charges]," the US army official told Reuters news agency.
"Everybody feels terrible about it. But given the climate and the security atmosphere, the security procedures at the checkpoint operations have to be run by the letter," he added.
The soldiers involved will face no disciplinary action.
Mr Calipari was fatally shot as he threw himself over Ms Sgrena to protect her from a hail of bullets.
******
Obviously, this is not the official statement, so details are lacking. However, it's disappointing to know that this is going to come down to a case of "Yes, you did" and "No, I didn't." I don't recall if the driver (or an occupant in the front passenger seat, if there was one) survived, and they make no mention of it, here. When an eyewitness in the middle of events gives contrary accounts to your own story, something's rotten in Denmark. All I can think of is that 1.) She's lying. 2.) She didn't see/hear the warnings from her position in the car and is mistaken 3.) She's being honest and is correct and the soldiers are lying. or 4.) The soldiers gave the warnings when the occupants of the vehicle couldn't see them, in which case it was a crummy place for a checkpoint. Regardless of how it happened, we don't seem to be handling this very politically. We could at least make some blatant show of making concessions to the Italian offiicals involved in the investigation (or just privvy to its findings,) to show that we want them to be satisfied with the official results...instead of ignoring their requests for further investigation and proceeding with an offiical conclusion.
