Western Newspapers Now Knowingly Employ Terrorist Sympathisers

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
Guardian stands by journalist linked to extreme Islamic party
by Gordon MacMillan Brand Republic 18 Jul 2005

Guardian standing by reporter

LONDON - A Guardian journalist, Dilpazier Aslam, has been linked to a radical Islamic organisation, which is known to promote anti-Semitic hatred and praises suicide bombers as martyrs, and the paper is refusing to sack him.

His links to extreme Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir were revealed by bloggers, including Scott Burgess and Harry's Place, last week after Aslam wrote a July 13 article about the suicide bombers in the Guardian, which also ran in both the LA Times and Australian Age.

The piece suggested that the UK should not have been shocked by the 7/7 suicide bombings as that would "suggest that the bombings happened through no responsibility of our own". He went on to refer to the suicide bombers "as sassy".

"Second- and third-generation Muslims are without the don't-rock-the-boat attitude ... We're much sassier with our opinions, not caring if the boat gets rocked."

The Washington Times condemned the Guardian piece as an "apology for terrorism" and named the paper, along with the BBC for its axing the use of the word terrorist, as its Knaves of the week.

The party that Aslam is linked to, Hizb ut-Tahrir, is banned in many countries around the world, and has been described by the BBC as one that calls on Muslims to kill Jews.

The Guardian has confirmed that Aslam is a member of Hizb Ut Tahrir. As well as his controversial piece on the bombings, he has also reported on the story from three of the bombers' home town of Leeds.

"Dilpazier Aslam is a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir, an organisation which is legal in this country. We are keeping the matter under review," the paper said in a statement.

Two years ago, a Muslim leader warned BBC Newsnight that if its activities went unchecked, the UK would face terrorist attacks.

"I believe that if Hizb ut-Tahrir are not stopped at this stage, and we continue to let them politicise and pollute the youngsters minds and other gullible people's minds, then what will happen, in effect, is that these terrorism acts and these suicide bombings that we hear going on around in foreign countries, we will actually start seeing these incidents happening outside our doorsteps," said an "anonymous Muslim leader" quoted from a Newsnight transcript.

Prior to joining the Guardian, Aslam wrote for the Hizb ut-Tahrir magazine khilafah.com, which calls for the establishing of a global Islamic state or caliphate, and part of which calls for the "destruction of institutions and government systems".

Although the magazine stresses this would be non-violent, the group was recently involved in threatening the life of anti-war MP George Galloway.

The Respect MP was at a meeting interrupted by Hizb ut-Tahrir members who told him that he was a "false prophet" and that a "sentence of death" had been served on him.

Burgess has since written to the Guardian comment editor Seumas Milne asking whether Guardian newspapers was aware of Aslam's affiliations before he was hired.

"If so, one wonders whether it is standard Guardian policy to employ members of extremist organisations like Hizb ut-Tahrir (which was described in a Guardian article of November 11, 2004 as "Britain's most radical Islamic group").

"The question is raised as to whether you would hire, and provide a forum for, a known member of an international group of right-wing extremists who expressed similar views.

Link

Here is the ultimate extension of liberalism. Give the enemy of your country a big platform and a giant megaphone with which to humanize the attacks which kill your family, friends and countrymen. Such compassion, understanding and empathy the Guardian has. I really hope CBS gets with it soon and hires an Islamic fundamentalist reporter soon. We're falling behind on the world idiocy scale.

Reminds me so much of the guise of "academic freedom". Liberalism is indeed a mental disorder.
 
WTF is brandrepublic? From their website: Brand Republic serves the fast-moving world of advertising, marketing, public relations and new media.

NEXT!
 
It's the UK equivilent of Brandweek. It's a publication that deals with advertising, marketing and branding.

Just because YOU haven't heard of it doesn't mean it's not credible. There's a whole world of industry related publications with a whole lot more credibility than you can muster.
 
Go to their homepage. It's crap. No intelligent person would consider this a reliable website.
 
Dude, it's the marketing equivlent of the Journal of the American Medial Association or the New England Journal of Medicine.

We have equivilents here in the press for broadcasting and media like; Electronic Media, Broadcasting & Cable, Brandweek, Adweek, Variety, (And their American counterpart PRWeek) etc. Are you so stupid that you don't know what specialty or industry press is???

This is like someone saying Play, Electronic Gaming Monthly, IGN or gamesindustry.biz has no credibility in what they report.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Dude, it's the marketing equivlent of the Journal of the American Medial Association or the New England Journal of Medicine.[/quote]
Maybe, but the AMA and the New England Journal of Medicine tend to be bright enough to stick to topics at least moderately related to their own field. Please excuse me if I don't take articles about terrorism/politics that seriously when they come from a site dedicated to evaluating Pepsi marketting campaigns.
 
So, would you also say that advertising publications would have no credibility discussing how advertisers would view spending money in the Guardian given the fact that they employ a known terroist sympathizer as well?

This isn't about them discussing politics and terrorisim. It's about them addressing the fact that a writer for a major advertising driven publication is a member of a terrorist leaning organization. If a reporter from CNN, FOX News, CBS, ABC or NBC were found to be a member of the Klan it would be reported on by Adweek, Brandweek and PRWeek. It's no different.
 
bread's done
Back
Top