Wikileaks founder warranted for rape. Real or US govt. conspiracy?

If it's a conspiracy he would already be dead. Remember Deborah Jeane Palfrey (aka DC Madam) who wanted to out all the politicians who used her service if they continue to have her prosecuted, oddly committed suicide shortly after. This is in lieu of her publicly stated belief that they will have her killed and make it look like a suicide.
 
It's a conspiracy. The term I was looking for is "sexual McCarthyism".

Try it out. When you read about Assange in six months, see if there is a throwaway in the article about him being arrested for rape.
 
[quote name='rumblebear']If it's a conspiracy he would already be dead. Remember Deborah Jeane Palfrey (aka DC Madam) who wanted to out all the politicians who used her service if they continue to have her prosecuted, oddly committed suicide shortly after. This is in lieu of her publicly stated belief that they will have her killed and make it look like a suicide.[/QUOTE]

Wow. Rumblebear posted something sensible...
 
[quote name='rumblebear']If it's a conspiracy he would already be dead. Remember Deborah Jeane Palfrey (aka DC Madam) who wanted to out all the politicians who used her service if they continue to have her prosecuted, oddly committed suicide shortly after. This is in lieu of her publicly stated belief that they will have her killed and make it look like a suicide.[/QUOTE]

I can get onboard with that theory myself. But lets say for sake of conversation she really was killed and it was made to look like suicide, thats a damn slick idea. She says publicly she would be killed and made to look like suicide and thats exactly what they do. Its a perfect coverup, because no one would really think they would do that right after her saying it.

But kill him over the wikileaks? I dont think that would happen. But I also think he would be framed for something more incriminating, allowing them to stick him in a dark hole someplace for the rest of his life. Of course being labeled a rapist, truth or not, is damaging to ones reputation overall to the point where no one would want to believe what he puts on his site true or not.

But then again maybe he is just a rapist. There is no rule that says only certain people can do bad things. And bad timing is a rule of nature were subject to.
 
[quote name='gargus']But then again maybe he is just a rapist. There is no rule that says only certain people can do bad things. And bad timing is a rule of nature were subject to.[/QUOTE]

Considering the case was dropped because, among other things, the stories were inconsistent, I don't see how you have any basis to think this.
 
[quote name='rumblebear']If it's a conspiracy he would already be dead. [/QUOTE]

Sorry, conspiracy does not require death. Look up the definition.
 
[quote name='fatherofcaitlyn']I would support treason on principle that you don't leak sensitive material. Punishment would be negligible since the content of the sensitive material only embarrasses the government instead of weakens it.[/QUOTE]

Gov't employees that leak sensitive information are culpable for the leak. Journalists who publish that information don't have the same obligation for secrecy. 1st Amendment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top