IAmTheCheapestGamer
Banned
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37453662/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/?gt1=43001
So you're telling me that this dumb woman couldn't follow her own instincts and instead choose an alternate route and is now suing because she was too stupid to keep herself out of harm's way?
I've walked along many a busy highway before and it's relatively safe if you take some precautions. You walk facing traffic, for one. Wear brightly colored clothing for another.
People just love looking for any reason to sue though, don't they?
SALT LAKE CITY - A pedestrian who says she was injured by a motorist while following an online walking route has filed a lawsuit claiming Google, Inc. supplied unsafe directions.
Lauren Rosenberg filed a lawsuit seeking more than $100,000 on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Utah. It also names a motorist she says hit her.
Rosenberg, a resident of Los Angeles County, says she used her phone in January to download walking directions from one end of Park City to the other.
Google Maps led her to walk on a busy road without sidewalks that wasnot reasonably safe for pedestrians," according to the lawsuit filed by the Los Angeles County resident.
"As a direct and proximate cause of defendant Google's careless, reckless and negligent providing of unsafe directions, plaintiff Lauren Rosenberg was led onto a dangerous highway, and was thereby stricken by a motor vehicle," the lawsuit states.
Rosenberg is seeking compensation for unspecified "severe" injuries and lost wages in addition to punitive damages. The lawsuit provided no further information on her age or residence.
Rosenberg couldn't be reached Tuesday. Her attorneys, Allen and Tyler Young of Provo, did not return messages.
Google spokeswoman Diana Adair did not return messages from The Associated Press.
The court papers didn't explain why Rosenberg walked along state Route 224 instead of choosing streets with sidewalks.
On its version for computers, Google Maps suggests one alternative for Rosenberg's route. It also highlights a disclaimer: "Use caution — This route may be missing sidewalks or pedestrian paths."
The mobile version of Google Maps, however, does not come with that warning.
So you're telling me that this dumb woman couldn't follow her own instincts and instead choose an alternate route and is now suing because she was too stupid to keep herself out of harm's way?
I've walked along many a busy highway before and it's relatively safe if you take some precautions. You walk facing traffic, for one. Wear brightly colored clothing for another.
People just love looking for any reason to sue though, don't they?