Since the 1940s, the majority of US drinking water has been fluoridated. The reasoning is to promote dental health and fight tooth decay, especially for those citizens that cannot afford proper medical attention.
The majority of dentists in America have supported and continue to support the use of fluoride in the drinking water and tooth decay has declined in the last 60 years.
And yet there are a number of people and organizations who hold that fluoridated water not only does not improve dental health, but is potentially toxic.
Some sites "against" fluoride in water
http://www.fluoridealert.org/
http://www.nofluoride.com/
http://www.fluoridation.com/
Point to some rather damning evidence, many of which are highlighted in this paper:
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/Dental/Fluoride/fluoride_index.htm
I couldn't find that many sites that make clear, research based claims for fluoridating water- here was one site:
http://www.fluorideinfo.org/
I don't firmly know what to think yet, fluoride as a topical treatment does seem to promote tooth health. The evidence against fluoridating water seems overwhelming (to me), while the argument for fluoridated water seems to be backed more by tradition and dubious correlation. Yes, tooth decay has declined, but it has also declined in areas that do not treat the water with fluoride. That many european nations have also banned or altered the fluoridated water practice also seems a powerful argument.
This isn't an issue that gets much attention, even when the economy is strong.
What are people's thoughts on the issue?
The majority of dentists in America have supported and continue to support the use of fluoride in the drinking water and tooth decay has declined in the last 60 years.
And yet there are a number of people and organizations who hold that fluoridated water not only does not improve dental health, but is potentially toxic.
Some sites "against" fluoride in water
http://www.fluoridealert.org/
http://www.nofluoride.com/
http://www.fluoridation.com/
Point to some rather damning evidence, many of which are highlighted in this paper:
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/Dental/Fluoride/fluoride_index.htm
I couldn't find that many sites that make clear, research based claims for fluoridating water- here was one site:
http://www.fluorideinfo.org/
I don't firmly know what to think yet, fluoride as a topical treatment does seem to promote tooth health. The evidence against fluoridating water seems overwhelming (to me), while the argument for fluoridated water seems to be backed more by tradition and dubious correlation. Yes, tooth decay has declined, but it has also declined in areas that do not treat the water with fluoride. That many european nations have also banned or altered the fluoridated water practice also seems a powerful argument.
This isn't an issue that gets much attention, even when the economy is strong.
What are people's thoughts on the issue?