Jump to content


- - - - -

AVENGERS 2: Age of Ultron (5/1/15) - Final Trailer


#931 AvengedBacklog   CAGiversary! CAGiversary!   13144 Posts   Joined 11.7 Years Ago  

AvengedBacklog

Posted 11 May 2015 - 10:30 AM

Uh, to be fair, the movie has been out for more than a week. It's a little ridiculous to come into a thread devoted to it and expect not to run into spoilers somewhere. My own spoiler tags were a formality I barely bothered to do.


I've already seen it twice, but that's a hell of a lot of spoilers that someone else may not have been expecting to see.

#932 ITDEFX   My foot itches..must be athlete's foot CAGiversary!   17270 Posts   Joined 18.7 Years Ago  

Posted 11 May 2015 - 09:35 PM

Well the unofficial policy is that spoiler tags are used for the opening weekend (from the Thursday night showing til Monday morning)...after that if you haven't taken the time to watch a highly anticipated movie (No time/Sold out excuses) then don't come into this thread until after you have seen the movie.... it's like if you were to go to wikipedia and type in the movie, you get the whole plot detailed.



#933 KaneRobot   The Profit$ of Doom CAGiversary!   10596 Posts   Joined 19.4 Years Ago  

Posted 11 May 2015 - 10:55 PM

Thought this film was not particularly good. I'm not shitting on Marvel...they had mostly been on a roll with this part of the universe. I thought the first film was great. Winter Soldier was great. Guardians was great. Thor 2 was passable. But man this film dragged ass WAY too much. One of us (not me) walked out with 10 minutes left. I didn't dislike it to that degree, but they could have easily sliced out 20-25 minutes of downtime in this self-indulgent "action movie" with superheros contemplating life for what seemed like an hour at a farmhouse (among other locations). It didn't serve to make the characters "more developed," it just made everything dull.

 

I'm confident this was just a misstep and future stuff will be fine, but this one left me feeling pretty underwhelmed.



#934 ITDEFX   My foot itches..must be athlete's foot CAGiversary!   17270 Posts   Joined 18.7 Years Ago  

Posted 12 May 2015 - 12:27 AM

What marvel needs to do is STOP throwing 3d at us.  I haven't seen 3d being properly utilized lately I can't recall any marvel movie since Thor 1(which I think was the first marvel movie in 3d) which the 3d effects were worth the extra cost of the ticket.  I am still debating to see this in a True IMAX Screen (uvar hazy chantilly) because I can't find any real information if it was shot with a true IMAX camera , an IMAX-D camera or just upcoverted to IMAX.  Can anyone confirm this?



#935 HydroX   Quintessential Studmuffin CAGiversary!   7253 Posts   Joined 14.2 Years Ago  

Posted 12 May 2015 - 01:25 PM

What marvel needs to do is STOP throwing 3d at us. I haven't seen 3d being properly utilized lately I can't recall any marvel movie since Thor 1(which I think was the first marvel movie in 3d) which the 3d effects were worth the extra cost of the ticket. I am still debating to see this in a True IMAX Screen (uvar hazy chantilly) because I can't find any real information if it was shot with a true IMAX camera , an IMAX-D camera or just upcoverted to IMAX. Can anyone confirm this?


Don't waste your time. I saw it in IMAX 3D opening night, then in 2D the Monday afterwards. Not a huge difference, really. Not many 3D effects, either. Just overall not worth it.

#936 ITDEFX   My foot itches..must be athlete's foot CAGiversary!   17270 Posts   Joined 18.7 Years Ago  

Posted 12 May 2015 - 11:44 PM

Well there is a big difference between true IMAX and IMAX-D.   Do you recall at ANY point during the movie the screen going from letter box to full frame or was the actual screen square or normal theater wide?  When I saw Dark Knight Rises and Interstellar at that Uvar Hazy imax screen it was square tall and it did switch between wide and full for IMAX scenes.

 

 

Don't waste your time. I saw it in IMAX 3D opening night, then in 2D the Monday afterwards. Not a huge difference, really. Not many 3D effects, either. Just overall not worth it.



#937 Navex  

Posted 13 May 2015 - 08:21 AM

Film's been out for awhile plus I know many of you have pirated it long before it even came out so SPOILERS below...

 

 

 

 

I thought it was alright. It turned out about how I expected it would - not anything amazing but still fun, just like the first one though I think I might like the first a bit more. I have to admit I liked the more eccentric Ultron we got, as I was really hoping for a serious, death machine no nonsense kinda robot but gotta say it was interesting to see Ultron like this. Though I only approve of this personality because he took his mannerisms after Stark as I thought that was a clever design as otherwise I would have thought it would have been weird to have him be so...different. Also, I couldn't help but think Spader sounded a lot like Jigsaw from Saw with the way they dubbed his voice but that's a good thing.

 

The twins were okay but it was plain as day they were added in there just for the sake of new characters as that story could have not had either of them and it still would have went the same.



#938 ITDEFX   My foot itches..must be athlete's foot CAGiversary!   17270 Posts   Joined 18.7 Years Ago  

Posted 14 May 2015 - 12:32 AM

Are you for real bro?

 

Don't come here and make that stupid comment about piracy.   We all go out there and pay for the over priced tickets to see this in the big screen and deafening surround sound.

 

Film's been out for awhile plus I know many of you have pirated it long before it even came out so SPOILERS below...



#939 Navex  

Posted 14 May 2015 - 08:44 AM

Are you for real bro?

 

Don't come here and make that stupid comment about piracy.   We all go out there and pay for the over priced tickets to see this in the big screen and deafening surround sound.

Considering we are on a site that caters to a bunch of cheapasses, yes. That and there are literally discussions on this site about people doing it. I hope you're being sarcastic if you're trying to imply people don't do that here.



#940 JP   Member of the Ravens Nation! Trade-in Value Team   8106 Posts   Joined 15.5 Years Ago  

Posted 14 May 2015 - 11:43 AM

I think it was more of a comment about this specific thread because as far as I can see there was no discussion of that in here. It kinda came off as saying everyone in here pirated it, and if we had discussed details before it came out that'd be fair but wasn't really necessary in this particular thread.