Best place to trade-in games?

MightySlacker

CAGiversary!
Feedback
100 (100%)
So I finally left my hermit cave and visited civilization. To my surprise, I found a FYE, and Gamestop, and a Gamecrazy in town. Since I have accumulated quite a pile of junk, it would be useful to figure out which place was the best to trade-in stuff.

I went and got 3 of the $5 Batman games from Best Buy. FYE gave me 8.50, Gamestop gave me 7, and GameCrazy gave me 7.50, although if I had their membership thing it would have been 8.25.

I also gave them a test about the Primal I got from EBGames, and Gamestop offered 5, and GameCrazy said 10.50 (12 with membership). I forgot to ask at FYE.

After reading the threads, I will assume that it's NOT Gamestop. Anyone have a preference between FYE and GameCrazy? I think that GameCrazy woule be better in the long run if you got a membership thing, although at FYE you can use store credit for giftcards and then use them online. Discuss.

Sorry if this is a repost or anything - I didn't want to clutter up the stickied thread.

Dave Olson
*SUPER DUPER INTERNET CELEBRITY SUPASTAR~!* TM.
 
I have no experience with Gamecrazy (none in my area) but it seems like FYE gives more than the other stores generally especially more than Gamestop or EB.
 
Went to EB yesterday to trade in 7 xbox games (all mint with manuals)..
Freedom fighters
Pulse Racer
Rogue Ops
Midway arcade treasures
Oddworld Munch
Tony Hawk 2x
Dark Angel

They offered me $14.25.x
Went to Game Crazy, and got $41 BEFORE Mvp discount... I have learned a lesson, never trade in anything at EB.
 
Either Gamecrazy or FYE. It would behoove you to check each store's trade-in values before giving away your games. I think that becoming an MVP member would give you a little bit more bang for your game so to speak.

Sorry, I'm writing a history presentation so I'm stuck in intelligent vocab hell.
 
So, where do I check out the trade in values? Both of them say "it's in the computer and it's whatever corporate puts on it". It'd be retarded to take a huge stack of games down to one to get a price check, then go to the other one, then go back to the first one if it happens to be better.

Minimal work RULES.

Dave Olson
*SUPER DUPER INTERNET CELEBRITY SUPASTAR~!* TM.
 
How bout I teach you a lesson.


Stop buying so much crap.

You are just supporting more of these horrid games.

You also fool unsuspecting mothers/fathers. As they see these games, with familiar names, and lower prices, and fall for it.

Their kid wants a new game. So buy what the salesman tells you.

I see them pushing games like Vexx, Superman, Batman, etc, all the time. Usually, for terrible prices.


If you didn't buy these crap games, in the first place, you would never lose out, when it came time, that you grew tired of them.

If you bought games, that were good, or even great, you would have no problem just trading them to someone, at places like CAG.

Or, you can just sell them on eBay, or VG Auctions, now.


Seriously, if you don't have a problem, buying the Hobbit, for $50, then taking it to EB, 2 weeks later, for $10, you shouldn't be allowed in a game store.

Or, if you enjoy games like, MK Mythologies, Dr Muto, Grabbed by the Ghoulies, Beyblade, and Saga Frontier, and you did not buy them blindly, please,.....get a Shaqing clue!

Buy a magazine. Get a membership to Blockbuster. Shit,...just read the back of the package.
This isn't cool.

The more garbage you buy, the more support the developers have, when trying to bribe their company, to allow another monstrosity, to be made.

Anyone dumb enough to trade in a brand new game, for a 15-30% return, is just retarded.

Please wake up.
 
Most common, which are games that are 5 dollars or less to buy at ebgames.com etc. FYE gives 7.50-8.50 I went in there with several games that I bought that were 5 new at circuity city/bestbuy and from what ive seen, those rates apply to other common games. In addition some people, I included have gotten new prices for new games without scaming. but obviously YMMV. I believe you can check gamestop's website for trade in values, Ebgames will often compare to that.
 
I will do everyone a favor and not quote drone. But i must rebut his illinformed post. First of all, who are you to say what is crap? Just because a game is cheap does not necessarily mean that it is crap. Second if a person wants to buy a game and enjoy it, that is their business. No one on this thread has really complained at all, they were just curious as to where they could get the most bang for their buck.

More importantly, most of the people trading in these 'crappy' games have gotten them very cheaply through some other deal and are trying to make a profit by re-selling them and getting store credit.

Please try to read a thread before you start flaming everyone in it.
 
drone8888, we are not all supporting these crappy games. This is CAG, there are many of us who wait til the game drops to an approiate price that we feel reflects the value of the game.
 
Wow, I didn't think anyone liked MK Mythologies. I rented it for $1.49 when it first came out just to see how bad it was after IGN gave it a 3. something and I felt ripped off. I tried to like the game but the controls (if I remember, you had to press a button to turn around instead of using the D-Pad) ruined the game for me.
 
Well, Drone8888 I guess you are supporting the habbit by buying a popular "crappy game" MK Mythologies.



Actually was he saying MK was crappy, or was he saying that we need to get a clue if we dont buy it?
 
[quote name='drone8888']How bout I teach you a lesson.[/quote]

These kind of posts always turn out WONDERFUL.

Stop buying so much crap.
You are just supporting more of these horrid games.
You also fool unsuspecting mothers/fathers. As they see these games, with familiar names, and lower prices, and fall for it.
Their kid wants a new game. So buy what the salesman tells you.
I see them pushing games like Vexx, Superman, Batman, etc, all the time. Usually, for terrible prices.
What? I'm not buying a bunch of crap. My post clearly indicates that I bought the Batmans SPECIFICALLY as a test, because I've never traded in games before, and wasn't sure which ones I own I wanted to trade. The goal was that if I decide to trade them in, where would be the best place.
And buying a game when it's that price isn't supporting anything. Because when they get the numbers, it will say "This game sold like shit until it got marked down to 5 bucks. Maybe we should make a better game next time." Selling 1 million games at $4.99 is about the same as selling 100,000 games at 49.99. Think about it.
I have no idea what other sort of jibba jabba you start talking about, so I'll leave it alone.
If you didn't buy these crap games, in the first place, you would never lose out, when it came time, that you grew tired of them.
If you bought games, that were good, or even great, you would have no problem just trading them to someone, at places like CAG.
Or, you can just sell them on eBay, or VG Auctions, now.
Most of that's covered above. And the reason I'm asking is because I might not want be looking to trade anything. Now, I know everyone on CAG is honest, and I would be very suprised if someone wanted to rip me off, but maybe I think it's easier just to go down to a place and get store credit, and get a system or something new, or a GC as a present?
Seriously, if you don't have a problem, buying the Hobbit, for $50, then taking it to EB, 2 weeks later, for $10, you shouldn't be allowed in a game store.
Or, if you enjoy games like, MK Mythologies, Dr Muto, Grabbed by the Ghoulies, Beyblade, and Saga Frontier, and you did not buy them blindly, please,.....get a Shaqing clue!
Buy a magazine. Get a membership to Blockbuster. Shit,...just read the back of the package.
This isn't cool.
The more garbage you buy, the more support the developers have, when trying to bribe their company, to allow another monstrosity, to be made.
What? That's my argument - I would never buy the Hobbit when it was 50 bucks. I would probably never buy the hobbit. But when I'm done with any kind of game, and most I keep, but if there's one I know I'm never going to play, I'd like to maximize what I can get out of it. Now, I would never get rid of Disgaea, and there wouldn't be a shortage of people to trade it to, but if I wanted to trade it in, and one store was offering 29 bucks and the other 22, I want the 29 bucks. It's that simple.
Anyone dumb enough to trade in a brand new game, for a 15-30% return, is just retarded.
I disagree. If My Best Buy had any of those Fatal Frame for 9.99, and I could get $20 bucks a piece down the street trade-in, I'd have bought every one of them.
Please wake up.
Please sober up.

Dave Olson
*SUPER DUPER INTERNET CELEBRITY SUPASTAR~!* TM.
 
I'm not bashing you.

When you return a game, you support the store buying it back.

You take away from the creators.

I wasn't talking about getting good deals. I'm all for getting good deals.
I just think that EB and Gamestop are rip off artists.

Yeah, it IS intelligent to buy a $5 game, and turn it in for $10.

Its also better to burn a copy off of the internet, than to pay at all.........see??

A developer, and a publisher want similar things. To have the game disbursed, and enjoyed, and, to make a profit.

The dev's probably don't mind the whole loss of sales, the publisher takes, as the game gets redisbursed, through trade-ins.

The developer doesn't mind the INITIAL, slow sales, of a title, because the guys over at EB, report back to them. They report the traffic of the games, and this goes toward their ultimate decision, whether or not a certain game/genre, sees a sequel, or similar title.


Everyone takes a hit, except EB and GS. Although they are taxed for this, it is nothing that is to be worried about. They double as a surveyor, and make all of that money back.


This is why your games still cost, a 3rd the price of a system.

Do you really want to play a load of poorly produced games??? NO! They only serve a purpose to you.,.,...to trade in, for a better game.

Thats fine. I'm not trying to be a prick. It makes a lot of sense.

I'm just looking at it in MACRO. You think you make no difference.
You think that your opinions don't count. You think that they'll keep making crap games, even if you don't buy them.

I think you're wrong.

I KNOW that your opinions matter. Thats why people pay CheapyD, to advertise, and promote here. You think Overstock.com is really hooking you up??? They get those overproduced titles, for pennies on the dollar.
They mark them up, to where they make at least a proposed percentage, over what they paid. The company can comfortably conduct business, based on their founding scheme. Like; "we can run with a 20% profit margin, so we'll base our operation on 35%."

They then offer "DEALS", in place of currency, to advertise on websites, and other media venues, which pan out to, FREE. They shave a small percentage off the total price, but gain thousands of new customers, which compensates, 10 fold.

The thing is,..these places don't truly damage a publisher. The titles were probably purchased in bulk, for close to MSRP. Sat in a warehouse, waiting for a major surge, from the consumer, and when it didn't happen, a company, like Overstock, picks them up, for a greatly reduced price.
Usually, they are just dropshipped. Bypassing the expensive overseas, freight shipping.


So, when you don't buy Mary Kate and Ashley, and only the 5% of 10 yo girls who own a console, do,..... publishers produce fewer copies. There are focus groups, that claim that a certain genre, appeals to a certain consumer, so the developers whip up a crap game, just to please this group.

If it works, they continue making a certain type of game.

This is where we all play a big part.

By buying a game, we are basically testing out a future franchise.
By trading it in, we give EB a percentage, which in return, they report to the publisher. Who then makes the call, that, hey," initial sales sucked, and a large percentage were traded in". This leads to a decision.

Should they cancel another title, or, decrease the developers budget, to lower the price of the game??

If its an in house publisher, they won't lose as much money. If its outside, they will lose more, and probably opt for another, more poorly produced title. As an outside publisher has to have product to publish, delivered, or they're SOL.

Magazines and now, more popular, websites, are wined and dined with money, and exclusives, to sway consumers into skipping their sense of logic. They are taught to ignore reasoning, and follow the beliefs of the reviewer.

This doesn't stop the rebels, though. Just because a game got bad reviews, they will buy it anyway. Then....trade it in.

Most reviews are acurate. I mean how hard is it to say this; "If you liked Onimusha, then you'll love Onimusha 2, or how about 3?? Oh, and if you loved the Onimusha series, then you'll love Devil May Cry, and DMC 2! How's Castlevania LOI?,...well, it suc....I mean, its similar to DMC, check it out!!" What about Rygar?? Wan't that a good game? It was similar to all of the above.
Oh, thats right, no one has ever heard of Rygar. Plus, the magazine wasn't "given enough time with the game, before its release..?"

HHHMMMM.

Whatever. If you can't see all of the money you are losing...
If you can't tell what games are going to be good, before you buy them...
If you don't see how you are fueling the fire, of poorly produced, clones,...then,....Whatever.

Making money, off of someone elses' junk, has been the road to millionaire-dom, since the concept of recycling aluminum cans.

Trade away.

I can't wait for DMC 3. Or, Viewtiful Joe, starring Dante. These will be sure fire hits. How do I know??? HHHMMM.
 
Mar, VERY few stores give cash (I think only Texas). Give it a matter o time and almost al lwill give cash (we already have the option in the computer to give out cash, which would be 80% of the trade-in price)
 
Drone, you are an idiot wrapped in moron. When a game is marked down heavily (from $50 to $10, hell even to $30), it's already written off. They are marked down to just MOVE THE INVENTORY OUT. Otherwise those crappy games take up space that could otherwise make money for the retailer. Read up on shelf space and market presence sometime.

And the whole 'taking away from the developers' think...damn that's out of left field. If a company publishes a truly horrid game, it seems like we'd want the market to show them it wasn't a good idea.

And BTW if companies really lost money on this stuff, you can rest assured they would change their policies in a hurry.
 
Yeah, they would change their policies,......they would close shop, or relocate.

Like Silicon Knights, Factor 5, Bioware, most of Blizzard, etc.

So Shaq you! There is no need to call names. How old are you now??

Anyways, you talk of market presence, well look at the market. It is flooded with clones, and flops. How many of you bought Billy Hatcher, Vexx, Dr Muto, Crash Wrath, Spyro, Ty, Tak, etc..?

Why did you buy them??

To complete your collection??

How am I a moron??

Did I disagree with trading in games to make a profit?

Did I call anyone a name?

NO. You are just egotist, with a clam up your ass.

I don't need to read anything. Supply and demand, has been common practice, since the dawn of digestion. There is no need to fill stores with product, that is unwanted.

My whole point is, that you are the blind fool, who throws your limited knowledge into the mix, and offers no thread of info. You make excuses why its alright, to pay $50 for a game. Or, $300-500 for a console, when you know downright, that it is ridiculous.
Toss in some of your business jargon, from your college courses, that come straight out of your text book, and claim it is the Gospel.

You're right, it costs a lot of money to make a game, these days. Thats why all of these cheap games are manufactured. AND,..if you read what I wrote, instead of skimming through it, just so you could post a big word, from your extensive vocabulary, you would see that I stated exactly that, which you objectified.

A company, like, but not limited to, Overstock, purchases unsold, or, overproduced software, either straight from the publisher, or, from another overstocked distributor, such as a dropshipper.

When the publisher decides that the games expectations haven't been met, and the product isn't moving, they THEN, write off the overproduced products, as loss. Whether or not, the distributing parties, receive any reimbursement, depends on the contracts in place, and any associated agreements in place.

My whole point, was that everything a gamer does, or, more or less, anything a person does, impacts the industry, critically.

We allow games to come to realization. We fund the publishing houses, and the developers. Its common sense.

So, if we are to have it your way, we should just accept anything that is made, and never expect something better.
We should settle for this generations' hardware limitations, and enjoy them for the rest of our lives.

You heard it here first.

PsyClerk says, "Don't demand better, more original games! Eventually, one will be made. Keep buying anything they throw at you. Who cares what you think, I don't mind clones, and junk, so neither should you."

He has been to college, so watch out. He can sweet talk you, with his extensive knowledge of macroeconomics.

Just ask his boss, over at EB.

Oh wait, he works at EB....fancy that. You know, those employees, really love trade-ins.
They can buy them back, for a substantial cut.

What do you know.

Princeton, on to EB, thats my goal in life.

What a piece of work.
 
Maybe they are longwinded, but I'm not wrong.

Neither am I alone, in feeling that we are the reason. Although I need not prove it, here's an example.

This just came up, on today's Insider mailbox, over at IGN.


Bad Consumers to Blame?
I hate to say this we the consumer are ruining video games. Yes the blame is falling flat on our shoulders. The die hard (myself included) rant and rave on forums, but the masses still buy junk. I remember back when PS1 and Saturn both made a console port of two popular games. C&C Red Alert for PS1 and Warcraft for Saturn. Warcraft looked beautiful on the Saturn and C&C looked like crap. But what happened, the silly masses purchased more copies of C&C for the PS1. Now that above statement was just an example of how lousy games are promoted and good games (on good systems but bad marketing) are killed. Thus killing the system and ultimately the video game developers reason to make good games.

Now I know that different games appeal to different people but junk is junk and there is no way around it. I own a PS2 and a XBOX and they both have been slapping their seal of approval on a bunch of junk titles.(I'll be it that PS2 does pump out an extremely high level of it). And we the consumers buy it. But we shun great games like Panzar Dragoon, Prince of Persia, ESPN Hockey, BGoE, and Otogi. For what, for lousy games that don't hold a candle to some of the better(but less selling) instant classics. Developers will constantly, constantly, constantly, shell out crap ass long as we buy it and if we want the good games we need to demand it. And the only thing that the developers understand is sales. I thank you Fran and IGN for giving me a forum to express myself anf my fustration. Peace.

Fran responds: You're not alone. I think the professional community -- the journalists, the developers, the publishers -- feel similarly. Honestly, it's upsetting to see a title like Viewtiful Joe face tough times and something like Simpsons: Road Rage sell a ton just because it's the license it is thrown over a poor Crazy Taxi clone.

Prince of Persia is also a great example. Certainly, it had room to improve, but it was genuinely unique, had tons of production value, and deserved to sell every bit as every other Top 10 seller last year, which includes Vice City, Enter the Matrix, Medal of Honor: Rising Sun, and Pokemon Sapphire, to name a few.

Unfortunately, recognizing this problem won't solve it. The trend of sequel after sequel will continue, because the mass consumer doesn't want to take a risk. And, can you completely blame them? It's easy to get burned. You see a title like Metal Arms, andwhat incentive do you really have to try it out? Unless you've read some reviews you trust, a title from "Swingin' Ape" just might not be for you. But, as it turns out, it is a great game, but there's no easy way to convince millions of that.

This year, all the Top 10 will no doubt be sequels. I have much fear for the future of videogaming if consumers are still educated by these patternized development cycles.



Sounds similar to my woes, huh??

Just not as long winded.
 
Mainstream gamers buy what they recognize. They don't do extensive research before buying a game and therefore choose what title has been marketed the best. The majority of gamers that you find on these sorts of websites take the time to learn about the less hyped titles and will purchase those games much more frequently than the average consumer.
 
[quote name='drone8888']This just came up, on today's Insider mailbox, over at IGN.[/quote]

it's too bad that the only thing that you've posted in this thread that's been clear is something from another site that you didn't write.

i'm not sure if you are arguing that it's bad to buy games that suck, it's bad to buy cheap games that suck, or it's bad to buy cheap games that suck and then trade them in for profit. i don't think it's the third, since you yourself said it is in fact an intelligent means of profit, but then you followed it up with the option of burning it off of the internet, which isn't profitable at all. part of what you say seems to be against the used stores like EB and gamestop, but then you go off on a tangent about the popularity of sequals. whatever, i'm not going to argue, because you don't seem like the type that would admit being wrong, and again i'm not exactly sure what your point is. if it's that you should spend your money on good games, then i agree. if it's that trading in games at EB or where ever supports that store, then i agree (assuming the games they buy from you are able to sell). however, there are a couple things i felt the need to point out, and maybe i'm just nitpicking, but i don't care:

1 - your comment "I can't wait for DMC 3. Or, Viewtiful Joe, starring Dante. These will be sure fire hits. How do I know??? HHHMMM" implies that viewtiful joe is a bad game, but in reality it's a game that deserves any credit it gets, and while a sequal to it will probably sell as well as the first, but that's what happens in the media. and if it sucks, then there will be a backlash, but even so it will still do well. i mean, we can look at the austin powers movies. the first one was something different and it caught on, so they made sequals. it's just what the entertainment industry does.

2 - kids want batman and ninja turtles games, it doesn't matter how good they are. things like that will always sell, because kids can't really seperate the good from the bad, they just want to play the games that go with their favorite cartoon, and that's ok becuase they are kids.

3 - i've looked this over and i'm still trying to figure out how what psyclerk said can be construed as "You make excuses why its alright, to pay $50 for a game. Or, $300-500 for a console, when you know downright, that it is ridiculous. Toss in some of your business jargon, from your college courses, that come straight out of your text book, and claim it is the Gospel."

4 - the good things in the entertainment industry are always overlooked (well, often). music, movies, and video games. that's because the majority of people, the average game player, the average movie goer, the average music listener, that's what they want. it's not ok, but it's not something that can't be changed.

5 - i'm not sure how buying a bad game at $5 is bad. i'm not saying i would, since i try to steer clear of bad games, but if there was a bad game at $5 that i could trade in and get at least 100% profit from it, chances are high i would (if i wanted the store credit or whatever). now, if you buy a game at a very low price, no matter how good or bad, the biggest message you are sending (if you're really sending one at all at that point) is that cheap games sell. so you could say that paying $50 for a really great game (prince of persia, i suppose, since you seem to like it) is still bad, since you are supporting pricing games at $50.

---

anyways, i would like to ask which stores give cash for games.
 
bread's done
Back
Top