I just bought Soul Caliber 2 for Gamecube at Blockbuster for $14.99. It was a good deal I think. I know it's 9 months old but I had to wait till I saw it cheaper than $19.99. I had to wait, because I had Soul Caliber for Dreamcast when it first launched in Japan on the date 8/99 about 5 years ago and personally, their wasn't much of a differance.
Now I love the Soul Caliber series, but Tekken and Virtua Figher 4 seem to be more fun for me. When Tekken 4 was released, every video game magazine talked pretty bad about it. Saying it wasn't much of an upgrade from Tekken Tag. I really agreed with them on that point. But what really pissed me off came months later.
Soul Caliber 2 came out for every Nex-Gen system. I guess it sold pretty well and I'm happy for that, but It also really annoyed me. Everyone bought it, loved it and thought it was the gratest 3-D fighter. Even the game magazines thought so, (besides Virtua Fighter 4.) But was it a HUGE upgrade from the first Soul Caliber?
Personally I really didn't think so. The main arguements that gave Tekken 4 bad reviews from both magazines and players is that it only really had two new characters (Marduk and Steve Fox and I'm not including Christie becaue she's a rehash of Eddy Gordo), but even Jin's style was totally diffrent, so that could make 3 new characters. Now how many new characters does Soul Caliber 2 have? Talim, Rapheal and the console exclusive charcter (Link, Spawn and Hiehatchi). Cassandra and Yun Sung were just rehashes of older charcters, right? And Necrid is a mix of everyone so I don't count him.) In total thats 3 totally new characters.
Besides the 3 new characters in SC 2, what changed from 1 to 2? Music, Backgrounds and a Weapon Master mode I beat in one day. That wasn't worth my $50, and I'm sorry for anyone that thought it was.
Why did everyone love Soul Caliber 2 and not Tekken 4 or Virtua Fighter 4? Was it because it's "easier" to play? Let me know, I'm curious why some people highly regard this 3-D fighter better than all others. Soul Caliber was great 5 years ago, on a Dreamcast when it was revolutionary. Now I don't see much diffrance between this upgrade and Tekken's upgrade.
Now I love the Soul Caliber series, but Tekken and Virtua Figher 4 seem to be more fun for me. When Tekken 4 was released, every video game magazine talked pretty bad about it. Saying it wasn't much of an upgrade from Tekken Tag. I really agreed with them on that point. But what really pissed me off came months later.
Soul Caliber 2 came out for every Nex-Gen system. I guess it sold pretty well and I'm happy for that, but It also really annoyed me. Everyone bought it, loved it and thought it was the gratest 3-D fighter. Even the game magazines thought so, (besides Virtua Fighter 4.) But was it a HUGE upgrade from the first Soul Caliber?
Personally I really didn't think so. The main arguements that gave Tekken 4 bad reviews from both magazines and players is that it only really had two new characters (Marduk and Steve Fox and I'm not including Christie becaue she's a rehash of Eddy Gordo), but even Jin's style was totally diffrent, so that could make 3 new characters. Now how many new characters does Soul Caliber 2 have? Talim, Rapheal and the console exclusive charcter (Link, Spawn and Hiehatchi). Cassandra and Yun Sung were just rehashes of older charcters, right? And Necrid is a mix of everyone so I don't count him.) In total thats 3 totally new characters.
Besides the 3 new characters in SC 2, what changed from 1 to 2? Music, Backgrounds and a Weapon Master mode I beat in one day. That wasn't worth my $50, and I'm sorry for anyone that thought it was.
Why did everyone love Soul Caliber 2 and not Tekken 4 or Virtua Fighter 4? Was it because it's "easier" to play? Let me know, I'm curious why some people highly regard this 3-D fighter better than all others. Soul Caliber was great 5 years ago, on a Dreamcast when it was revolutionary. Now I don't see much diffrance between this upgrade and Tekken's upgrade.