Edited by lolwhat, 31 August 2014 - 08:22 PM.
Jump to content
Posted 12 March 2013 - 06:36 PM
Posted 12 March 2013 - 09:10 PM
Hey, you look like you have a lot of money; how about donating some of it to my Extra Life drive?
Posted 12 March 2013 - 11:56 PM
Posted 15 April 2013 - 12:53 AM
Posted 22 April 2013 - 07:28 AM
Posted 23 April 2013 - 12:25 AM
Check out our blog: http://abloggymess.com/ Plenty of fun for everyone!
3DS Friend Code: 2492-4618-0670 Always looking for new Pokemon!
philip25033 on PSN and Wiiu
Get free stuff with my Swagbucks Referral Link: http://swagbucks.com/refer/cookieparty
Posted 08 May 2013 - 02:50 AM
Posted 06 June 2013 - 04:24 PM
Thanks for the review, I've definitely been eyeing this one for a few weeks now.
I'm really enjoying your reviews by the way, keep up the good work.
There is no one true CAG. Some are more "gamer," some are more "cheap" and certainly some are far more "ass."
Posted 10 June 2013 - 11:50 PM
Thanks for the review! Gets me amped to play it. I have this game in the backlog and planning on finishing this by atleast BF.
Amor est mihi causa sequendi!
Wolf: I understand your attempts at humor.
I simply do not find them entertaining.
Posted 02 July 2013 - 06:29 PM
It's a good review,but I don't understand the perfect score with the terrible multiplayer. Yeah it was developed outside of Crystal Dynamics by Eidos Montreal,but it's still part of the game,so it should be taken into consideration when scoring it the game as a whole.
Posted 02 July 2013 - 10:11 PM
That's an approach I've always disagreed strongly with. If a game comes with separate components, I'd rather that the better one reflect its official score, since you're in fact getting that game in the package. There is no obligation to play multiplayer in Tomb Raider, in fact, its mere existence is just a bonus when you look at it that way. It's there if you want to try it, but it has no relevance to the single player. "Scoring the game as a whole" just doesn't make sense when, as a whole, there are literally 2 games on the same disc that are completely unrelated, one being a million times better than the other. If they were intertwined, then things would be different. Few games do that sort of thing, though.
I mean, what's your favorite game of all time? Imagine it had some bullshit tacked onto it, like adding Horse Racing Mode to Ocarina of Time. So, now your originally 10/10 review is notched down to a 9.5? That's just a petty, confusing, and absurd practice, in my mind.