The True History of the Democratic Racist Party

iwarboY

CAGiversary!
Feedback
45 (100%)
I'll just leave this here... for anyone interested in knowing the truth of the Democratic party.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1523692/posts

ZoNation with Alfonzo Rachel: The Democratic Party's Long History of Racism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb6Hv4nJ40U&feature=youtu.be

ZoNation: Black Lives Matter, So They Should Vote Republican

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPChn4_KgDU

http://russp.us/racism.htm

Had the positions of the parties been the opposite, and the Democrats had fought the Republicans to end slavery, the historical party roles would no doubt be repeated incessantly in these documentaries. Funny how that works.

Fact: During the Civil War era, the "Radical Republicans" were given that name because they wanted to not only end slavery but also to endow the freed slaves with full citizenship, equality, and rights.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A 10 year old article with the most recent cited facts being over 50 years ago and already commonly known anyway. This is... I just don't even know, I'm at a loss. The only thing that would make this better is to link to a Geocities page about how Bill Clinton is ruining America by turning it socialist. OP, you'll be a fine addition to the VS forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The 'root' of the problem has been hidden, and like weeds to a healthy flower/nation . . .    

 And no, this isn't commonly known, that is what is so frightening.

 Informed dems don't like that I post this truth, but I really don't care for opinions if you disagree with the truth, this is for the uninformed and blinded, the deceived and downtrodden.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I love the denialists swearing that the Southern Strategy never happened.  You have the famous Atwater quote about it, you have multiple RNC heads admitting to it (and some apologizing for it) but then you still have the rank and file Republicans who just insist that it was all made up.

That's fine, in a way.  The more Republicans who fail to see the truth, the easier it is for Democrats to keep their voting blocs.  For every pseudo-intellectual post at Free Republic, you have a thousand people losing their shit over a YouTube clip of a black woman saying "Obamaphone" or trying to suppress voting in minority neighborhoods under the guise of "stopping vote fraud".  Maybe working on that would be more fruitful than talking about what Malcolm X said umpteen decades ago.

 
A 10 year old article with the most recent cited facts being over 50 years ago and already commonly known anyway. This is... I just don't even know, I'm at a loss. The only thing that would make this better is to link to a Geocities page about how Bill Clinton is ruining America by turning it socialist. OP, you'll be a fine addition to the VS forum.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb6Hv4nJ40U

 
OMG, we fought Germans for TWO consecutive world wars, and yet in this era one of our presidents gives them backrubs! Where's my freedom cabbage!

So these "Democrats" continue to tow the party line:

“There is nobody in this chamber who is more appreciative than I am for the gentleman from Tennessee and my friend from Michigan standing up for the rights of race, religion, national religion of the Delta Smelt, the snail darter, various lizards, the lesser prairie chicken, the greater sage grouts and so many other insects who would want someone standing for their religion, their race, their national origin and I think that’s wonderful.” -Louie Gohmert (R-Tx)
"Because a lot of people who go into prison go into prison straight -- and when they come out, they're gay. So, did something happen while they were in there? Ask yourself that question," -Presidential Candidate and ex-Neurosurgeon Ben Carson
"For everyone who's a valedictorian, there's another 100 out there that weigh 130 pounds and they’ve got calves the size of cantaloupes because they're hauling 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert. Those people would be legalized with the same act." -Steve King (R-Iowa)
Oh, so discrimination against other groups of people is a okay.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wordlessly posting Youtube links isn't an argument unless the point you're trying to make is "I have no valid argument but since you can't hold a two-way debate against a guy in a video, that seems like a safe bet."

 
Wordlessly posting Youtube links isn't an argument unless the point you're trying to make is "I have no valid argument but since you can't hold a two-way debate against a guy in a video, that seems like a safe bet."
Nope. I don't play this 'debate' game. I do however post videos based in truth and allow others to form their own opinions on them. I know others will disagree, some will even become hostile and I'm certainly alright with this.

 
Yeah, if I had indefensible views, I wouldn't bother trying to defend them either.
Defend my views? They are not views, what I post is truth. To 'defend' anything would mean viewers would not be forming their own opinions, . . were I to 'defend' the truth you or another would surely attempt to steer another's mindset to falsity.

 
Sure, i'll have people feel they've  'won' -- doesn't affect the truth or myself in the least. Carry on.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure, i'll have people feel they've 'won' -- doesn't affect the truth or myself in the least. Carry on.
I can post a Loose Change video, a clip about oil companies suppressing the 5,000 mpg car and a YouTube of Godzilla and say "I'm just posting truth for people to make opinions" and it won't make any of those things true.

It's not really that I won, more that you lost when the best you have is a video and you aren't even able to form your own opinions about what it says and defend those thoughts. Apparently conservatism is all about blindly following whatever a video tells you to think and just assume it's "truth".

 
I can post a Loose Change video, a clip about oil companies suppressing the 5,000 mpg car and a YouTube of Godzilla and say "I'm just posting truth for people to make opinions" and it won't make any of those things true.

It's not really that I won, more that you lost when the best you have is a video and you aren't even able to form your own opinions about what it says and defend those thoughts. Apparently conservatism is all about blindly following whatever a video tells you to think and just assume it's "truth".
Sure, ok, well it was nice watching you talk with yourself. Goodbye opinionated person on Internet.
 
Man, the craziest people show up in this forum.
Unbelievers and atheists call Christ followers crazy, libs and dems call repubs and conservatives crazy, and the world continues to turn...

everyone will come to their own conclusion, the fortunate strong willed ones will stand on their own two feet.

 
You're not forced to respond.  You can just let the fact stand that you blindly follow Youtube videos someone told you was the "truth" without any independent thought of your own to share about them. 

You posted the video on a public forum, thus inviting commentary.  If you can't handle that, maybe you should think twice about doing so in the future.  I hear that private blogs with the comments turned off are all the rage these days.

 
You're not forced to respond. You can just let the fact stand that you blindly follow Youtube videos someone told you was the "truth" without any independent thought of your own to share about them.

You posted the video on a public forum, thus inviting commentary. If you can't handle that, maybe you should think twice about doing so in the future. I hear that private blogs with the comments turned off are all the rage these days.
you keep being you, then. I'm not responding to your opinions, but I will say this . . the FACTS of racism within the democratic party were always true, they will always be true, and there will always be people like you who deny these facts. The same goes for those who deny the holocaust ever occurred. So, yes, you will continue being who you are and yes, I'm ok with that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, yes, you will continue being who you are and yes, I'm ok with that.
Right. I'll continue being willing to discuss, question and examine claims for truth and you'll keep being the sort of tool who sees a video, says "It's truth!" and refuses to talk about it because it's far easier to just believe whatever some conservative outlet wants you to believe.

I'm also okay with that.

 
Right. I'll continue being willing to discuss, question and examine claims for truth and you'll keep being the sort of tool who sees a video, says "It's truth!" and refuses to talk about it because it's far easier to just believe whatever some conservative outlet wants you to believe.

I'm also okay with that.
Nice flamebait, troll.

 
If calling me a troll makes you feel better about your inability to form your own thoughts and opinions, so it goes.

Truth can be tested.  Truth can be questioned, debated and examined and it'll hold up.  People with actual convictions based on truth can have those convictions tested.  Truth is not throwing a random video and running away with your ears covered chanting "Nanananana I can't hear you!!! truth truth truth nanananana!!!"

That's just cowardice.  And it's cowardice born from knowing that your beliefs are just someone else's words that you're parroting without thought.

If that's how you want to live your life, there's no stopping you.  And calling me a "troll" won't change that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
you resort to name calling and I don't appreciate this. you're laying bait and I throw the bait aside, this must rile you up. 

My refusal of speaking with you does not make your words/opinions against me hold weight, nor do I hold anything you say as factual and no-one else should either.

Only the weak should encounter you, if they felt the need to dissect their stance in which I clearly do not.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unbelievers and atheists call Christ followers crazy, libs and dems call repubs and conservatives crazy, and the world continues to turn...

everyone will come to their own conclusion, the fortunate strong willed ones will stand on their own two feet.
......What? Are you on drugs?

 
nor do I hold anything you say as factual and no-one else should either.
But they should hold you and your video as factual? Why is that? What led you to determine that this video was more factual and truthful than any other video? Explain the difference.

Oh, that's right. You can't. You can cry, you can say I'm calling you names, you can say a hundred times that you don't care what I say (yet you keep responding) but what you absolutely can not do is explain why this video has any merit.

 
But they should hold you and your video as factual? Why is that? What led you to determine that this video was more factual and truthful than any other video? Explain the difference.

Oh, that's right. You can't. You can cry, you can say I'm calling you names, you can say a hundred times that you don't care what I say (yet you keep responding) but what you absolutely can not do is explain why this video has any merit.
No-one is crying here troll, go ahead and get angry I'm beginning to enjoy this. I respond for obvious reasons, not because I respect you, because I do not.. but because you attempt to paint a picture of me and defame my character with your ridiculous opinions of why and what I do, -- of my intentions.

So then, here is what is going to happen, I'm going to copy/paste my previous responses to your absurd posts and that is that.

Me: "Nope. I don't play this 'debate' game. I do however post videos based in truth and allow others to form their own opinions on them. I know others will disagree, some will even become hostile and I'm certainly alright with this."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Me: "Nope. I don't play this 'debate' game. I do however post videos based in truth and allow others to form their own opinions on them. I know others will disagree, some will even become hostile and I'm certainly alright with this."
Angry? :lol: Pointing out your ignorance hardly gets me mad. So, you can't explain what makes this video "based in truth", huh? Just believed it because someone told you too? And you think everyone else should watch it and accept it as truth because... you said so?

Hang on, I have a video about some swampland real estate I need you to watch.

 
For the record I'm not engaging in conversation with you. Though this delusion you have of

"someone telling me to believe certain information is true" is deception, as why would any person listen to you or I instead of reviewing the information for themselves, this is exactly what 'I' have done and in turn I am presenting this here for others to review for themselves. 

To the reader, please do review the links and info that I've posted, I am sure those who can stand on their own two feet are more than capable of deciding for themselves of what is true.  Thank you.

 
Got tedious really fast...
I disagree, this is the most exciting thread on Vs in a long time. I don't think we've had this level of crazy since Plisken!

Don't worry, it'll get better as we closer to the election. Probably not as crazy as 08, but Clinton Vs Bush Part Deux will probably be a better fight than Mayweather Vs Pacquiao...or at least the pre-fight hype will be anyways.

Hey @egofed, I think someone is trying to steal your soapbox!:rofl:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I never said it wasn't. :) Just letting people know that the video is just an opinion, and not a fact, so they can decide what their own opinion of it will be. :grouphug:
I disagree - and your 'group hug' doesn't sway me nor should your 'group hug' sway anyone into thinking the video(s) are opinions. They are very much factual. I can go all night. The viewers will decide for themselves, no need for your 'persuasiuon'

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did view. Some fact, some inaccuracies and mostly the host's opinions and interpretations. Not surprisingly, the opinions

are based around a strong conservative mindset that clearly biased the host's stance.

So now the viewer has decided for himself about the validity of the video and we can consider it settled.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did view. Some fact, some inaccuracies and mostly my opinions and interpretations. Not surprisingly, my opinions

are based around a stubborn Democratic mindset that clearly biased my stance.

So now I have decided for myself about the validity of the video and we can consider it settled.
Fixed. This was too easy. Thanks for the chuckle, though!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, you weren't actually interested in people viewing it and forming their own opinions. Noted!
Well, 'interested' isn't a word I would use, people I would encourage, but not you..Only you aren't allowed to view anything here or form any thought or opinion. you aren't interested and frankly I'm not interested in you.

 
Well, 'interested' isn't a word I would use, people I would encourage, but not you..Only you aren't allowed to view anything here or form any thought or opinion. you aren't interested and frankly I'm not interested in you.
Hi friend, after watching the videos, I am convinced and converted. Where can I learn more about this? Would you believe me if I told you that anal sodomy can burst someone's intestines and this is why the Lord is against homosexuals?
 
I disagree - and your 'group hug' doesn't sway me nor should your 'group hug' sway anyone into thinking the video(s) are opinions. They are very much factual. I can go all night. The viewers will decide for themselves, no need for your 'persuasiuon'
It's your right to your opinion that it's a fact, but like I said, it's just an opinion, and not a fact. I'm not trying to persuade anyone, just letting people know that my opinion isn't the same as yours on whether it's based on facts or not. :) Also, :grouphug:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
bread's done
Back
Top