As long as you're happy with a 5% accuracy rating that's all that matters.
What was that they said about 1,000 monkeys with 1,000 typewriters producing Shakespeare? Yeah, same kind of accuracy.
Want me to find a site on 1,000 reasons not to vote for Kerry? It may have pieces from Rush Limbaugh, the NRA, G. Gordon Liddy, National Right to Life Campaign, the 700 Club, Ann Coultre but I can tell you I will have come up with 1,000 and dammit.... 5% of them might be accurate and that sure is enough to vote for Bush.
Did you ever hear of the 60/40 rule in politics? Basically you're never going to agree with any politician 100% of the time so you vote for the politician you agree with 60% of the time and eat the other 40. Before anyone says I agree 100% with Bush, you're wrong.
I've gone on the record saying his tax cuts weren't deep enough. There should be no prescription drug plan. His domestic spending record is abysmal. His stance on wanting to grant amnesty to illegals is political pandering at its worst and there are others. Unfortunately since we never talk about any of those things you sheep bleat "talking points! BLAH BLAH BLAH!".
If you're satisfied with 5% accuracy, so be it. I'll remember that the next time you smear any article I post.