[quote name='Access_Denied']Except it forgot the part about the hundreds of manufacturer defects, where your bike could easily explode on you at any point in time for no reason whatsoever. It kind of sucks when you wake up in the morning to turn on your PC that has never been connected to the internet to find out that it has a BSOD from you playing solitaire the day before.
Also, nearly any PC configuration that run Windows can also run Mac. And in fact, hundreds of thousands of people do that, with help of the OSx86 project. And even Mac Pros are customizable, even if you buy them right from Apple.
I won't say that Mac is better, and I'll let the argument continue, but that picture is just dead wrong. The metaphor just doesn't work on this occasion.
Also, after having my Mac almost a year, I have yet to encounter a speed problem that wasn't caused by me being too cheap to shell out the money for more RAM. Which I believe is a problem that would affect me no matter what computer I use.
EDIT: Again, not directed towards you, just the picture. Also, OP, if you want a Mac, do it. It's worth it. I have a friend here at college who has an ASUS laptop with a quad-core processor and 6GB RAM. It will run any PC game he wants. But after seeing me use my Macbook for so long, he says that his next laptop will be a Macbook. I've had 4 friends buy Macbooks because they liked mine, and he'll be number 5.[/QUOTE]
I'll start by saying I perceive the Mac/PC thing as MacOS vs. Windows/Linux/BSD/Whatever.
It's no longer a hardware battle, so there's no point to make the "Macs are more reliable" argument. They use the same stuff (except for the "logic board" aka motherboard), so they both fail equally. Their forums are just as full as anyone else's with complaints about crappy hardware
Case in point:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2323521&tstart=0