Wow thanks for the clever insight that no-one else has thought of before. Your statement is not entirely accurate, anyways. It should say "Activision = the next EA (circa 2002, back when EA sucked)," because EA is currently awesome, and Activision is most definitely not.
Activision
ing sucks. Guitar Hero sucks, Tony Hawk sucks (and it's going to be pathetically hilarious when the next Tony Hawk comes out, and it's a
in clone of Skate), Dreamworks licensed games suck, Spiderman sucks, Quantum of Solace sucks. Everything they have slated for this year will assuredly suck.
EA is awesome. Skate is awesome, Dead Space is awesome, Command & Conquer is awesome, Burnout is awesome, Rock Band is awesome, Battlefield is awesome, Mirror's Edge is awesome. Brutal Legend looks awesome. Dragon Age looks awesome. Henry Hatsworth looks awesome. Rage looks awesome.
Activision also sucks because they are hellbent on destroying Brutal Legend, the developer Double Fine, and the director Tim Schafer himself. First, they
officially dropped the game following the Vivendi merger, and made it publicly obvious that they wanted nothing to do with it (or any of Sierra's other properties, except Crash, Spyro, and Prototype). Then, they interfered with Double Fine trying to find a new publisher, seemingly out of spite. And now that Double Fine has finally and thankfully secured a new publisher in EA, Activision has come out of nowhere and threatened to sue EA, trying to prevent them from publishing the game, claiming that they believed that they were still in negotiations with Double Fine about the game. Utter bullshit, as they
repeatedly made announcements that they were dropping it (along with Ghostbusters, Riddick, etc). It's
ing bizarre, because it looks like they seriously have it in for the game, and are just out to destroy Double Fine, perhaps because they are jealous of how
ing awesome Tim Schafer, his studio, and his games are.
[quote name='Jek Porkins']Uh... Activision = the current EA.[/QUOTE]
No, because the current EA is awesome.